Fabricating Consent: Three-Dimensional Objects as Rhetorical Compositions

Abstract An array of new technologies has made it much easier for non-specialists to fabricate three-dimensional products ranging from clothes to plastic prototypes. This article explores the implications of these new developments for composition and rhetoric using a heuristic derived from earlier discussions of visual and multimodal rhetoric. Analysis of these discussions suggests that at least four kinds of arguments are made for new rhetorical modes: arguments from infrastructural accessibility, from rhetorical effectiveness, from cultural status, and from (de)specialization. Applying this schema to three-dimensional fabricated rhetoric reveals that three-dimensional rhetoric is increasingly available as an option to ordinary citizens, offers distinctive rhetorical opportunities, is valued by the broader culture outside the academy, and can be usefully understood through analytical frameworks regularly used by the field of composition and rhetoric. This article concludes that when placed in the hands of ordinary rhetors, three-dimensional rhetoric is potentially transformative and offers important cultural and political opportunities. By appropriating the rhetoric of fabricated objects, we can more effectively achieve the goals of equality and social justice.

[1]  Steven Lubar,et al.  History from things : essays on material culture , 1994 .

[2]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation , 2008 .

[3]  Jeffrey T. Grabill,et al.  Infrastructure and Composing: The "When" of New-Media Writing , 2005 .

[4]  S. Pearce Museum studies in material culture , 1989 .

[5]  Ronald E. Day,et al.  What is Documentation?: English Translation of the Classic French Text , 2006 .

[6]  Carole Blair,et al.  Reproducing civil rights tactics: The rhetorical performances of the civil rights memorial , 2000 .

[7]  Carole Blair Reflections on criticism and bodies: Parables from public places , 2001 .

[8]  Gail E. Hawisher Passions Pedagogies and 21st Century Technologies , 1999 .

[9]  R. Davis Indian Art Objects as Loot , 1993, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[10]  B. Sutton-Smith,et al.  Toys As Culture , 1986 .

[11]  Victoria J. Gallagher,et al.  Memory and Reconciliation in the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute , 2010 .

[12]  D. W. Black The Rhetoric of Toys , 1982 .

[13]  Jennifer A. González,et al.  Rhetoric of the Object: Material Memory and the Artwork of Amalia Mesa–Bains , 1993 .

[14]  M. Douglas,et al.  The World of Goods , 2021 .

[15]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Rhetoric and the arts of design , 1996 .

[16]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  Book Reviews: The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts , 1995, CL.

[17]  Jody Shipka,et al.  A Multimodal Task-Based Framework for Composing. , 2005 .

[18]  Ashok Kumar,et al.  From mass customization to mass personalization: a strategic transformation , 2007 .

[19]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  The Human Condition , 1960 .

[20]  Joy S. Ritchie,et al.  Teaching Rhetorica: Theory, Pedagogy, Practice , 2006 .

[21]  Liz Rohan I Remember Mamma: Material Rhetoric, Mnemonic Activity, and One Woman's Turn-of-the-Twentieth-Century Quilt , 2004 .

[22]  Bill Brown A Sense of Things , 2003 .

[23]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The meaning of things: Coding categories and definitions , 1981 .

[24]  R. Marback Unclenching the Fist: Embodying Rhetoric and Giving Objects Their Due , 2008 .

[25]  Judy Elsley The semiotics of quilting: discourse of the marginalized , 1990 .

[26]  George A. Kennedy,et al.  The art of rhetoric in the Roman world, 300 B.C.-A.D. 300 , 1962 .

[27]  Steve Westbrook Visual Rhetoric in a Culture of Fear: Impediments to Multimedia Production , 2006, College English.

[28]  V. Margolin The Struggle for Utopia: Rodchenko, Lissitzky, Moholy-Nagy, 1917-1946 , 1997 .

[29]  Jean Baudrillard,et al.  The System of Objects , 1968 .

[30]  What Do Brook's Bricks Mean?: Toward a Theory of the "Mobility" of Objects in Theatrical Discourse , 1981 .

[31]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop--from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication , 2005 .

[32]  J. Hocking,et al.  Strategies of redemption at the Vietnam veterans’ memorial , 1988 .

[33]  Cary Carson,et al.  Of Consuming Interests: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century , 1994 .

[34]  Moving multimodality beyond the binaries: A response to Gunther Kress' "Gains and Losses" , 2005 .

[35]  Diana George,et al.  From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing , 2002 .

[36]  Brian Torode,et al.  Subculture: The Meaning of Style. , 1981 .

[37]  A. Appadurai The social life of things: Toward an anthropology of thing , 1986 .

[38]  M. Buckland What is a “document”? , 1997 .

[39]  J. Wilkins An essay towards a real character, and a philosophical language, 1668 , 1968 .

[40]  D. Wilkinson The Doll Exhibit: A Psycho-Cultural Analysis of Black Female Role Stereotypes , 1987 .

[41]  R. Belk,et al.  Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities , 1989 .

[42]  John Trimbur,et al.  Composition and the Circulation of Writing , 2000 .

[43]  Richard Buchanan Design and the New Rhetoric: Productive Arts in the Philosophy of Culture , 2001 .

[44]  Carole Blair,et al.  Public memorializing in postmodernity: The Vietnam veterans memorial as prototype , 1991 .

[45]  Webb Keane,et al.  Semiotics and the social analysis of material things , 2003 .

[46]  J. Sand Was Meiji Taste in Interiors "Orientalist?" , 2000 .

[47]  J. D. Prown,et al.  American artifacts : essays in material culture , 2000 .

[48]  V. Margolin Design discourse : history, theory, criticism , 1989 .

[49]  Grant McCracken,et al.  Culture and consumption II : markets, meaning, and brandmanagement , 2005 .

[50]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning ! , 2005 .

[51]  Sonja K. Foss Ambiguity as persuasion: The Vietnam Veterans memorial , 1986 .

[52]  Peter Ehrenhaus The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: An Invitation to Argument , 1988 .

[53]  K. Wohlwend Damsels in Discourse: Girls Consuming and Producing Identity Texts Through Disney Princess Play , 2009 .

[54]  Mary Rose Williams A Reconceptualization of Protest Rhetoric: Women's Quilts as Rhetorical Forms , 1994 .

[55]  Bruce McComiskey,et al.  Teaching Composition As A Social Process , 2000 .

[56]  J. J. Farrell Shopping: The Moral Ecology of Consumption , 1998 .

[57]  Robert Lee Wolff,et al.  Gains and losses , 1977 .

[58]  Eilean Hooper-Greenhill,et al.  Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture , 1992 .

[59]  A. Haas Wampum as Hypertext: An American Indian Intellectual Tradition of Multimedia Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[60]  Anne Wysocki awaywithwords: On the possibilities in unavailable designs , 2005 .

[61]  Robert Scholes Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English , 1985 .

[62]  N. Postman,et al.  "Mix a Little Folly with Your Wisdom"--Horace@@@Children and Television.@@@Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. , 1987 .

[63]  Jenny Edbauer,et al.  Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies , 2005 .

[64]  T. Schlereth Material culture studies in America , 1984 .

[65]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice , 1985 .

[66]  Arantxa Capdevila i Gómez The rhetoric of objects: rhetorical phases as a model for generating meanings , 2004 .

[67]  R. Blair,et al.  Material life in America, 1600-1860 , 1988 .

[68]  R. Thomson The Troubled Republic: Visual Culture and Social Debate in France, 1889–1900 , 2005 .

[69]  Sean D. Williams Part 1: Thinking Out of the Pro-Verbal Box. , 2001 .

[70]  Craig Stroupe,et al.  Visualizing English: Recognizing the Hybrid Literacy of Visual and Verbal Authorship on the Web. , 2000 .

[71]  M. Barnard Fashion as Communication , 1996 .

[72]  Danny Miller Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter , 1997 .