Evaluation of the effects of hot mix asphalt density on mixture fatigue performance, rutting performance and MEPDG distress predictions

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of density on the fatigue cracking and rutting performance of hot mix asphalt mixtures. Two plant produced Superpave mixtures, 9.5 and 12.5 mm, were utilised to fabricate specimens to target density levels of 88, 91, 94 and 97% of the theoretical maximum specific gravity. The specimens were used to evaluate the mixture stiffness in the asphalt mixture performance test device, fatigue cracking characteristics utilising the beam fatigue test and the overlay test-based fatigue cracking analysis and rutting potential using the asphalt pavement analyser and the flow number test. Additionally, the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) distress prediction equations were used to predict the mixture performance as function of density. Overall, the testing analysis and MEPDG predictions indicated that higher density specimens yielded improved fatigue and rutting performance.

[1]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  SA-CrackPro , 2008 .

[2]  Geoffrey M. Rowe,et al.  Evaluation of Aspects of E * Test Using HMA Specimens with Varying Void , 2008 .

[3]  Geoffrey M. Rowe,et al.  Evaluation of Aspects of E* Test by Using Hot-Mix Asphalt Specimens with Varying Void Contents , 2009 .

[4]  Ghassan R. Chehab,et al.  Evaluating Recycled Asphalt Pavement Mixtures with Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Level 3 Analysis , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew W Witczak.  Specification Criteria for Simple Performance Tests for Rutting: Volume I: Dynamic Modulus (E*) and Volume II: Flow Number and Flow Time , 2007 .

[6]  E Ray Brown.  DENSITY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE - HOW MUCH IS NEEDED? , 1990 .

[7]  John E. Haddock,et al.  HMA Pavement Performance and Durability , 2006 .

[8]  P. Casey,et al.  Federal Highway Administration , 1994 .

[9]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice , 2008 .

[10]  Ramon F Bonaquist.  An Experimental Plan for Validation of an Endurance Limit for HMA Pavements , 2008 .

[11]  Ghassan R. Chehab,et al.  Sensitivity of RAP Binder Grade on Performance Predictions in the MEPDG , 2009 .

[12]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Development and Verification of the Overlay Tester Based Fatigue Cracking Prediction Approach , 2007 .

[13]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[14]  M. R. Mitchell,et al.  Determination of Price Reduction Factors for Density-Deficient Asphalt Pavements , 2008 .

[15]  Ghassan R. Chehab,et al.  Evaluating RAP Mixtures using the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide Level 3 Analysis , 2006 .

[16]  E T Harrigan.  SIGNIFICANCE OF "AS-CONSTRUCTED" HMA AIR VOIDS TO PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE FROM AN ANALYSIS OF LTPP DATA , 2002 .

[17]  Ramon Bonaquist.  Ruggedness Testing of the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number Tests with the Simple Performance Tester , 2008 .

[18]  W G Buttlar,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF END-RESULT AND PERFORMANCE-RELATED SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION IN ILLINOIS , 1998 .

[19]  D. H. Liebenberg.  Optical Standards And The American Society For Testing And Materials (ASTM) , 1980, Other Conferences.

[20]  John T Harvey,et al.  Effects of Asphalt Content and Air Void Content on Mix Fatigue and Stiffness , 1996 .

[21]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODELS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT BINDERS AND PAVING MIXES , 1993 .