Consistency pays: sex differences and fitness consequences of behavioural specialization in a wide-ranging seabird

Specialists and generalists often coexist within a single population, but the biological drivers of individual strategies are not fully resolved. When sexes differ in their foraging strategy, this can lead them to different environmental conditions and stability across their habitat range. As such, sexual segregation, combined with dominance, may lead to varying levels of specialization between the sexes. Here, we examine spatial and temporal niche width (intraindividual variability in aspects of foraging behaviour) of male and female black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys), and its consequences for fitness. We show that females, where maximum foraging range is under fluctuating selection, exhibit more variable behaviours and appear more generalist than males, who are under directional selection to forage close to the colony. However within each sex, successful birds had a much narrower niche width across most behaviours, suggesting some specialization is adaptive in both sexes. These results demonstrate that while there are sex differences in niche width, the fitness benefit of specialization in spatial distribution is strong in this wide-ranging seabird.

[1]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[2]  Cees G. M. Snoek,et al.  Variable Selection , 2019, Model-Based Clustering and Classification for Data Science.

[3]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Personality, Foraging and Fitness Consequences in a Long Lived Seabird , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  D. Réale,et al.  Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Michael J. Crawley The R Book: Crawley/The R Book , 2012 .

[6]  Mark Novak,et al.  Structure and mechanism of diet specialisation: testing models of individual variation in resource use with sea otters. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[7]  Márcio S Araújo,et al.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[8]  R. Phillips,et al.  Sexual segregation in distribution, diet and trophic level of seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[10]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[11]  G. Davoren,et al.  Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[12]  S. Garthe,et al.  Annual variation in diets, feeding locations and foraging behaviour of gannets in the North Sea: flexibility, consistency and constraint , 2007 .

[13]  W. Bowen,et al.  Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure: evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[14]  C. Bost,et al.  Chick-rearing Crozet shags (Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour , 2007, Antarctic Science.

[15]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources , 2007 .

[16]  R. Phillips,et al.  Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  R. Furness,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR GREAT SKUAS SPECIALIZING AS SEABIRD PREDATORS , 2004 .

[18]  Louie H. Yang,et al.  The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[19]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN PARENTAL INVESTMENT AND CHICK GROWTH IN WANDERING ALBATROSSES: FITNESS CONSEQUENCES , 2000 .

[20]  Y. Watanuki Individual diet difference, parental care and reproductive success in slaty-backed gulls , 1992 .

[21]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[22]  D. Grémillet,et al.  Individual differences in searching behaviour and spatial foraging consistency in a central place marine predator , 2014 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a seabird with reversed sexual dimorphism: the red-footed booby , 2005, Oecologia.

[25]  S. E. dit Durell Individual feeding specialisation in shorebirds: population consequences and conservation implications. , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  R. Pierotti,et al.  LONG-TERM REPRODUCTIVE OUTPUT IN WESTERN GULLS: CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATE TACTICS IN DIET CHOICE , 1999 .

[27]  D. Futuyma,et al.  The Evolution of Ecological Specialization , 1988 .