Anaerobic digestion: a prime solution for water, energy and food nexus challenges

We solve the problem of identifying one or more optimal patterns of anaerobic digestion (AD) installation across the UK, by considering existing installations, the current feedstock potential and the project growth of the potential via population, demography and urbanization. We test several scenarios for the level of adoption of the AD operations in the community under varying amounts of feedstock supply, which may arise from change in food waste or energy crops generation via other policies and incentives. For the most resilient scales of solutions, we demonstrate for the UK the net energy production (bio-gas and electricity) from AD (and so the avoided emissions from grid energy), the mass of bio-waste processed (and avoided land-fill), and the quantum of digestate produced (as a proxy for avoided irrigation and fertilizer production). In order to simulate the AD innovation within WEF nexus we use agent based modelling (ABM) owing to its bottom-up approach and capability of modelling complex systems with relatively low level data and information.

[1]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Agent Based Modeling and Simulation: An Informatics Perspective , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  R. Clift,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. , 2014, Waste management.

[3]  Sooyong Park,et al.  Designing multi-agent systems: a framework and application , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Jacopo Bacenetti,et al.  CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ELECTRICITY FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PLANTS IN ITALY , 2015 .

[5]  Carla Tagliaferri,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and advanced two-stage energy-from-waste technologies for methane production , 2016 .

[6]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins , 2012 .

[7]  R O'Shea,et al.  Modelling a demand driven biogas system for production of electricity at peak demand and for production of biomethane at other times. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Life cycle assessment of flexibly fed biogas processes for an improved demand-oriented biogas supply. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[9]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply , 2009 .

[11]  Andrew Crooks,et al.  Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Philip Jones,et al.  Assessing the potential for the uptake of on-farm anaerobic digestion for energy production in England. , 2011 .

[13]  R. Raven,et al.  Boundary crossing innovations: Case studies from the energy domain , 2009 .

[14]  P. Lacy,et al.  Waste To Wealth: The Circular Economy Advantage By Peter Lacy;Jakob Rutqvist , 2015 .

[15]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[16]  H. Aguirre-Villegas,et al.  Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools , 2017 .

[17]  U. Eberle,et al.  Environmental impacts of German food consumption and food losses , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.