Uncovering mechanisms of bistability in biological systems.

As the systems biology era progresses, theoreticians and experimentalists continue uncovering the molecular mechanisms that underlie the regulation of complex cellular phenomena, including those governing proliferation, differentiation, and death. The discovery of bistability in cellular responses and their signaling pathways has become a recurring theme, and prompted strong interest in understanding both the design and function of these networks. Modeling these systems has been crucial in assisting experimentalists to better understand how this and other types of behavior can emerge from a subset of regulators, and also to analyze and identify systems-level characteristics that would otherwise be difficult to intuit. In this review, recent advances in both theoretical and experimental work investigating the mechanistic as well as biological basis for bistability will be presented. These will include the role of positive feedback loops, the potential function of dual phosphorylation cycles, and substrate competition as a means of generating ultrasensitivity.

[1]  Avraham E Mayo,et al.  Hysteresis vs. Graded Responses: The Connections Make All the Difference , 2004, Science's STKE.

[2]  Liang Qiao,et al.  Bistability and Oscillations in the Huang-Ferrell Model of MAPK Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[6]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Control of the metabolic flux in a system with high enzyme concentrations and moiety-conserved cycles. The sum of the flux control coefficients can drop significantly below unity. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[7]  F. Cross,et al.  Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  D. Koshland,et al.  Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. , 1982, Science.

[9]  P B Sigler,et al.  Sst2 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gpa1: purification and characterization of a cognate RGS-Galpha protein pair in yeast. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[10]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. , 2001, Chaos.

[11]  J. Ferrelljr,et al.  Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs , 1996 .

[12]  W. Jacobs,et al.  Survival perspectives from the world's most successful pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[13]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Bringing cartoons to life , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[15]  J. Ferrell.  Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  Marc W. Kirschner,et al.  Cyclin activation of p34 cdc2 , 1990, Cell.

[17]  T. Elston,et al.  Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[18]  A. Kornberg,et al.  Inorganic polyphosphate: a molecule of many functions. , 1999, Progress in molecular and subcellular biology.

[19]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2007, Nature.

[20]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  V. Jain,et al.  Synthesis and hydrolysis of pppGpp in mycobacteria: a ligand mediated conformational switch in Rel. , 2007, Biophysical chemistry.

[22]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Systems-Level Dissection of the Cell-Cycle Oscillator: Bypassing Positive Feedback Produces Damped Oscillations , 2005, Cell.

[24]  Indrani Bose,et al.  Positive Feedback and Noise Activate the Stringent Response Regulator Rel in Mycobacteria , 2008, PloS one.

[25]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Mathematical Modeling Identifies Inhibitors of Apoptosis as Mediators of Positive Feedback and Bistability , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  E. Nishida,et al.  Two co‐existing mechanisms for nuclear import of MAP kinase: passive diffusion of a monomer and active transport of a dimer , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[27]  V. Mizrahi,et al.  The Stringent Response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Required for Long-Term Survival , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  Wei Chen,et al.  Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs , 2007, Oncogene.

[29]  G. Besra,et al.  Regulation of cell wall synthesis and growth. , 2007, Current molecular medicine.

[30]  A. Kamb,et al.  Graded mode of transcriptional induction in yeast pheromone signalling revealed by single‐cell analysis , 2001, Yeast.

[31]  K. Shokat,et al.  Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1 , 2003, Nature.

[32]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Competing docking interactions can bring about bistability in the MAPK cascade. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Coupling and coordination in gene expression processes: a systems biology view , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  L. Bardwell.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[35]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus laevis egg extracts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M Laurent,et al.  Multistability: a major means of differentiation and evolution in biological systems. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[37]  V. Jain,et al.  Molecular dissection of the mycobacterial stringent response protein Rel , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  Marta Cascante,et al.  Bistability from double phosphorylation in signal transduction , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[39]  T. Mukherjee,et al.  High Intracellular Level of Guanosine Tetraphosphate inMycobacterium smegmatis Changes the Morphology of the Bacterium , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[40]  J. Tyson,et al.  Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[41]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  The macroworld versus the microworld of biochemical regulation and control. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[42]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Pathways in Yeast , 2006, Science's STKE.

[43]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  A systems biology perspective on protein structural dynamics and signal transduction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[45]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module , 2007, Current Biology.

[46]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication , 2001, Nature.

[47]  J E Ferrell,et al.  How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.