The Topic and Y Indefinite in Cebuano

This paper examines two arguments in Cebuano: the topic and the y indefinite.1 These two noun phrases are referential opposites: the topic must refer to a presupposed object, while the y indefinite is either quantified or nonspecific in reference. Both noun phrases play a central role in the syntax of Cebuano clauses. Interestingly, their functions are better defined in terms of reference properties and discourse-based notions such as modes of judgement, rather than grammatical notions such as case. These two arguments seem to instantiate topic and focus relations at the sentence-level. In this paper the topic and y indefinite are analyzed in terms of a structural account which makes use of projections such as TopicP and FocusP. Such an account is inspired, in part, by analyses of so called “discourse configurational” languages (Kiss 1995, Szabolcsi 1996, Pearson 1996).

[1]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  Layers of Predication: the Non-Lexical Syntax of Clauses , 1996 .

[2]  R. Freeze EXISTENTIALS AND OTHER LOCATIVES , 1992 .

[3]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Spec of IP and spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages , 1992 .

[4]  Sarah Johanna Bell,et al.  Cebuano subjects in two frameworks. , 1976 .

[5]  Mandy Harvey,et al.  Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV , 1994 .

[6]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[7]  Paul. Schachter,et al.  Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects , 1977 .

[8]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Another Look at Tagalog Subjects , 2000 .

[9]  Mats Rooth Association with focus , 1985 .

[10]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[11]  John Bowers The syntax of predication , 1993 .

[12]  William A. Ladusaw Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong , 1994 .

[13]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  The position of subjects , 1991 .

[14]  Paul Kroeger,et al.  Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog , 1992 .

[15]  S.-Y. Kuroda Judgment Forms and Sentence Forms , 1992 .

[16]  G. Milsark Existential sentences in English , 1979 .

[17]  David Lewis,et al.  Formal semantics of Natural Language: Adverbs of quantification , 2008 .

[18]  Katalin É. Kiss,et al.  Discourse configurational languages , 1995 .

[19]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .

[20]  H. Sasse The thetic/categorical distinction revisited , 1987 .

[21]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[22]  S. Kuroda Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese , 1988 .

[23]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .