Damage tolerance optimization of composite stringer run-out under tensile load

Abstract Stringer run-outs are a common solution to achieve the necessary strength, stiffness and geometric requirements of some structural solutions. The mechanical behavior and complexity of such design details requires careful and thorough studies to ensure the structural integrity of the structure. The influence of some geometric variables of the run-out in the interface of the set stringer-panel is crucial to avoid the onset and growth of delamination cracks. In this study, a damage tolerant design of a stringer run-out is achieved by a process of design optimization and surrogate modeling techniques. A parametric finite element model created with python was used to generate a number of different geometrical designs of the stringer run-out. The relevant information of these models was adjusted using Radial Basis Functions (RBF). Finally, the optimization problem was solved using Quasi-Newton method and Genetic Algorithms. In the solution process, the RBF were used to compute the objective function: ratio between the energy release rate and the critical energy release rate according to the Benzeggagh–Kenane mixed mode criterion. Some design guidelines to obtain a damage tolerant stringer-panel interface have been derived from the results.

[1]  Rolf Zimmermann,et al.  Buckling and postbuckling of stringer stiffened fibre composite curved panels – Tests and computations , 2006 .

[2]  Tanchum Weller,et al.  Failure analysis in postbuckled composite T-sections , 2008 .

[3]  Ronald Krueger,et al.  Analysis of Composite Skin-Stiffener Debond Specimens Using a Shell/3D Modeling Technique and Submodeling , 2004 .

[4]  Joseph G. Pigeon,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation and Discovery , 2006, Technometrics.

[5]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  A comparative study of metamodeling methods for the design optimization of variable stiffness composites , 2014 .

[6]  M. Benzeggagh,et al.  Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus , 1996 .

[7]  Brian Falzon,et al.  The Behavior of Compressively Loaded Stiffener Runout Specimens – Part II: Finite Element Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  G.A.O. Davies,et al.  Failure of thick-skinned stiffener runout sections loaded in uniaxial compression , 2001 .

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[10]  C. Bisagni,et al.  Failure analysis of composite multi-stringer panels using simplified models , 2013 .

[11]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Design of composite stiffener run-outs for damage tolerance , 2011 .

[12]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: Definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness , 2010 .

[13]  S. Rippa,et al.  Numerical Procedures for Surface Fitting of Scattered Data by Radial Functions , 1986 .

[14]  J. Bonhomme,et al.  Fractography and failure mechanisms in static mode I and mode II delamination testing of unidirectional carbon reinforced composites , 2009 .

[15]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Nonlinear Analytical Approach for Preliminary Sizing of Discrete Composite Stringer Terminations , 2009 .

[16]  J. Renart,et al.  Side Clamped Beam (SCB) hinge system for delamination tests in beam-type composite specimens , 2011 .

[17]  Ronald Krueger,et al.  The Virtual Crack Closure Technique : History , Approach and Applications , 2002 .

[18]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Investigating the use of compliant webs in the damage-tolerant design of stiffener run-outs , 2013 .

[19]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Stiffener debonding mechanisms in post-buckled CFRP aerospace panels , 2005 .

[20]  Jean-Jacques Barrau,et al.  Multi-level experimental and numerical analysis of composite stiffener debonding. Part 1: Non-specific specimen level , 2009 .

[21]  Jan-Anders E. Månson,et al.  Optimization of hybrid thermoplastic composite structures using surrogate models and genetic algorithms , 2007 .

[22]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[23]  Emile S. Greenhalgh,et al.  Fracture mechanisms and failure processes at stiffener run-outs in polymer matrix composite stiffened elements , 2004 .

[24]  T. Anderson,et al.  Fracture mechanics - Fundamentals and applications , 2017 .

[25]  José Reinoso,et al.  A composite runout specimen subjected to tension–compression loading conditions: Experimental and global–local finite element analysis , 2013 .

[26]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[27]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Stiffener Runout Sections , 2007 .

[28]  J. A. Mayugo,et al.  A comparative study of genetic algorithms for the multi-objective optimization of composite stringers under compression loads , 2013 .

[29]  Janis Auzins,et al.  Surrogate modeling in design optimization of stiffened composite shells , 2006 .

[30]  G.A.O. Davies,et al.  The Behavior of Compressively Loaded Stiffener Runout Specimens – Part I: Experiments , 2003 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[32]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: Numerical simulations , 2009 .

[33]  Jean-Jacques Barrau,et al.  Multi-level experimental and numerical analysis of composite stiffener debonding. Part 2: Element and panel level , 2009 .

[34]  Javid Bayandor,et al.  An analysis methodology for failure in postbuckling skin-stiffener interfaces , 2008 .

[35]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[36]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery , 2006 .