THE IMPACT OF GLOSS TYPES ON IRANIAN EFL STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION AND LEXICAL RETENTION

Research has shown that the effect of marginal glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary retention is a controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to investigate this issue among Iranian university EFL students. Three types of glosses were applied in this study: single gloss in participants’ first language (SL1G), single gloss in participants’ second language (SL2G), and multiple-choice gloss (MCG) in participants’ second language. One hundred and twenty undergraduate students majoring in English Teaching at Azad University of Najafabad, Iran, read the texts under three conditions: SL1G, SL2G, and MCG. Afterwards, participants answered two vocabulary tests, one administered immediately after the reading test and another three weeks later. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and follow-up post hoc tests (p<.05) showed that MCG facilitated participants’ vocabulary learning while reading the text more than SLGs. The results of One-way ANOVA also revealed that SL2G was the most facilitative gloss type for the participants’ reading comprehension. The study illustrates how different types of textual glosses can affect both reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  James Coady,et al.  INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  G. Jacobs,et al.  L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge , 1994 .

[3]  James N. Davis.  Facilitating Effects of Marginal Glosses on Foreign Language Reading , 1989 .

[4]  Nobuyoshi Miyasako.  Does Text-glossing Have Any Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning through Reading for Japanese Senior High School Students? , 2002 .

[5]  F. L. Bell,et al.  The Language of Glosses in L2 Reading on Computer: Learners' Preferences , 2000 .

[6]  N. Schmitt.  Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning , 2008 .

[7]  J. Hulstijn.  Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity , 2001 .

[8]  M. Ko.  GLOSSES, COMPREHENSION, AND STRATEGY USE , 2005 .

[9]  George M. Jacobs,et al.  What Lurks in the Margin: Use of Vocabulary Glosses as a Strategy in Second Language Reading , 1994 .

[10]  Patricia Johnson,et al.  Effects on Reading Comprehension of Building Background Knowledge. , 1982 .

[11]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Appendixes , 2001 .

[12]  S. Gass.  Discussion: Incidental Vocabulary Learning. , 1999 .

[13]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Advanced Foreign Language Students: The Influence of Marginal Glosses, Dictionary Use, and Reoccurrence of Unknown Words , 1996 .

[14]  Freda M. Holley,et al.  VOCABULARY GLOSSES IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE READING MATERIALS , 1971 .

[15]  Yuichi Watanabe.  INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  J. Sinclair.  Collins Cobuild English dictionary , 1995 .

[17]  Susan M. Knight,et al.  Dictionary: The Tool of Last Result in Foreign Language Reading? A New Perspective. , 1994 .

[18]  Noriko Nagata,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERACTIVE GLOSSES , 1999 .

[19]  J. Hulstijn.  Retention of Inferred and Given Word Meanings: Experiments in Incidental Vocabulary Learning , 1992 .

[20]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[21]  Lara Lomicka,et al.  TO GLOSS OR NOT TO GLOSS: AN INVESTIGATION OF READING COMPREHENSION ONLINE , 1998 .

[22]  Luu Trong Tuan,et al.  Theory and Practice in Language Studies , 2011 .

[23]  Ying-Hsueh Cheng,et al.  L1 Glosses: Effects on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Retention. , 2009 .

[24]  Mohammad Taghi Farvardin,et al.  Textual Glosses, Text Types, and Reading Comprehension , 2011 .