Occupational differences in computer-related anxiety: implications for the implementation of a computerized patient management information system

Abstract The present investigation was concerned with the implementation of an information system within a health care setting. A large number of staff required training on a new patient management information system (MIS). The aim of this study was to assess occupational differences on a number of psychological variables associated with MIS success. Computer anxiety was of primary concern due to its relationship to avoidance of computers. A total of 175 questionnaires were distributed, with 103 questionnaires being completed and returned for analysis (61.1%). It was found that clerical/administrative staff had significantly higher self-efficacy regarding computer use and more experience with computers. The nursing group experienced significantly more, computer anxiety, negative attitudes, and negative expectations than the clerical group. Self-efficacy was found to be the best predictor of computer related anxiety. The results have implications for MIS implementation strategies particularly in the areas ...

[1]  N. Jo Campbell,et al.  Computer Anxiety of Rural Middle and Secondary School Students , 1989 .

[2]  M Brown.  Need help? Doesn't everyone? , 1980, Health care management review.

[3]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[4]  F. Dambrot,et al.  Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers , 1985 .

[5]  Q. Whiting-O'Keefe,et al.  A computerized summary medical record system can provide more information than the standard medical record. , 1985, JAMA.

[6]  D. E. Green,et al.  Development and evaluation of a 21-item version of the hopkins symptom checklist with New Zealand and united states respondents , 1988 .

[7]  J. Woodrow.  A Comparison of Four Computer Attitude Scales , 1991 .

[8]  S J Jay,et al.  Computerized Hospital Information Systems: Their Future Role in Medicine , 1982, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  K Andreoli,et al.  Computers in nursing care: the state of the art. , 1985, Nursing outlook.

[10]  K. French.  Methodological considerations in hospital patient opinion surveys. , 2003, International journal of nursing studies.

[11]  T. S. Startsman,et al.  The attitudes of medical and paramedical personnel toward computers. , 1972, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[12]  C. Blumer,et al.  The Development of the Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale , 1987 .

[13]  H. Klonoff,et al.  Measuring staff attitudes toward computerization. , 1975, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[14]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Testing the Factor Structure Invariance of a Computer Attitude Scale Over Two Grouping Conditions , 1990 .

[15]  Robert P. Minch,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Alienation: Toward a Definitive and Parsimonious Measure , 1990 .

[16]  B A Wilson.  Computer anxiety in nursing students. , 1991, The Journal of nursing education.

[17]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  Convergent Validity of Four Computer Anxiety Scales , 1989 .

[18]  A. P. Jagodzinski,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to the Measurement of Human-Computer Performance , 1988, Comput. J..

[19]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[20]  John Spicer,et al.  Effects of videotaped preparatory information on expectations, anxiety, and psychotherapy outcome. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  C L Cason,et al.  Effects of information about a threatening procedure on patients' expectations and emotional distress. , 1982, Nursing research.

[22]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer Attitudes: An Investigation of Construct and Predictive Validity Issues , 1990 .

[23]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  R. Hudiburg,et al.  Relating Computer-Associated Stress to Computerphobia , 1990, Psychological reports.

[25]  R. Jameson,et al.  The Bladder in Multiple Sclerosis , 1982, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[26]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  The Relationship between Computer Anxiety and Computer Achievement , 1988 .

[27]  K. Bakewell,et al.  Motivating factors in a student's choice of nursing as a career. , 1991, The Journal of nursing education.

[28]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer-Based Training: A Laboratory Experiment , 1990 .

[29]  A. Dowling.  Do Hospital Staff Interfere with Computer System Implementation? , 1980, Health care management review.

[30]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[31]  A Reynolds,et al.  Computer literacy: a mission for continuing education for professional nurses. , 1989, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[32]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales , 1984 .

[33]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Current attitudes of medical personnel toward computers. , 1979, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[34]  J P Krick,et al.  The role of the faculty adviser in a family medicine residency. , 1985, Journal of medical education.

[35]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[36]  John Cigas,et al.  A microcomputer interface for decoding telemetry data and displaying them numerically and graphically in real time , 1987 .

[37]  S. Bowman,et al.  Manipulation of expectancies about counseling and psychotherapy: Review and analysis of expectancy manipulation strategies and results. , 1988 .

[38]  Gibson Se,et al.  Managing computer resistance. , 1986 .

[39]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[40]  Robert J. Grantham,et al.  The Nature of Preference. , 1986 .

[41]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[42]  J. C. Masters,et al.  Behavior therapy: techniques and empirical findings , 1974 .

[43]  Terence J. G. Tracey,et al.  Role Anticipations and Preferences over the Course of Counseling. , 1988 .

[44]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Computers in clinical medicine, a critical review. , 1977, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[45]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[46]  E. Shortliffe,et al.  An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. , 1981, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[47]  J. Saltz,et al.  Perceptions and knowledge of medical students regarding computer applications in medicine. , 1985, Journal of medical education.

[48]  A. Raub.  CORRELATES OF COMPUTER ANXIETY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1981 .

[49]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[50]  Robin Kay,et al.  Predicting Student Teacher Commitment to the Use of Computers , 1990 .

[51]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The etiology of computerphobia , 1990 .

[52]  Jacobson Sf,et al.  Computer anxiety among nursing students, educators, staff, and administrators. , 1989 .

[53]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems and User Resistance: Theory and Practice , 1988, Comput. J..

[54]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  Predicting behavior on a computer from intentions, attitudes, and experience , 1990 .

[55]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[56]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.