Chance-Constrained Optimization of Demand Response to Price Signals

Household-based demand response is expected to play an increasing role in supporting the large scale integration of renewable energy generation in existing power systems and electricity markets. While the direct control of the consumption level of households is envisaged as a possibility, a credible alternative is that of indirect control based on price signals to be sent to these end-consumers. A methodology is described here allowing to estimate in advance the potential response of flexible end-consumers to price variations, subsequently embedded in an optimal price-signal generator. In contrast to some real-time pricing proposals in the literature, here prices are estimated and broadcast once a day for the following one, for households to optimally schedule their consumption. The price-response is modeled using stochastic finite impulse response (FIR) models. Parameters are estimated within a recursive least squares (RLS) framework using data measurable at the grid level, in an adaptive fashion. Optimal price signals are generated by embedding the FIR models within a chance-constrained optimization framework. The objective is to keep the price signal as unchanged as possible from the reference market price, whilst keeping consumption below a pre-defined acceptable level.

[1]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Volatility of Power Grids Under Real-Time Pricing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Olof M. Jarvegren,et al.  Pacific Northwest GridWise™ Testbed Demonstration Projects; Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project , 2008 .

[3]  Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.  Controlling power systems with price signals , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory , 2009 .

[5]  Jhi-Young Joo,et al.  Efficient Coordination of Wind Power and Price-Responsive Demand—Part I: Theoretical Foundations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Aharon Ben-Tal,et al.  Lectures on modern convex optimization , 1987 .

[7]  H. Allcott,et al.  Rethinking Real Time Electricity Pricing , 2011 .

[8]  A. Keane,et al.  Optimal Charging of Electric Vehicles in Low-Voltage Distribution Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[10]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  A Chance-Constrained Two-Stage Stochastic Program for Unit Commitment With Uncertain Wind Power Output , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  H. Madsen,et al.  Controlling Electricity Consumption by Forecasting its Response to Varying Prices , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  A bilevel model for electricity retailers' participation in a demand response market environment , 2013 .

[13]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[14]  B. Norman,et al.  A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming , 2004 .

[15]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Lectures on modern convex optimization - analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications , 2001, MPS-SIAM series on optimization.

[16]  Jacob Østergaard,et al.  Information and Communications Systems for Control-by-Price of Distributed Energy Resources and Flexible Demand , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming for Optimal Power Flow Under Uncertainty , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  Optimal Residential Load Control With Price Prediction in Real-Time Electricity Pricing Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[19]  B. Norman,et al.  A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  René Henrion,et al.  A model for dynamic chance constraints in hydro power reservoir management , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  G. Ault,et al.  Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response , 2010 .

[22]  Mircea Lazar,et al.  Real-time control of power systems using nodal prices , 2008 .

[23]  Qianfan Wang,et al.  A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[24]  R. Henrion,et al.  Optimization of a continuous distillation process under random inflow rate , 2003 .

[25]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Real-Time Demand Response Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[26]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Demand side resource operation on the Irish power system with high wind power penetration , 2011 .

[27]  R. Agnew,et al.  An Application of Chance Constrained Programming to Portfolio Selection in a Casualty Insurance Firm , 1969 .

[28]  Shi You,et al.  Indirect control for demand side management - A conceptual introduction , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[29]  Fred Schweppe,et al.  Homeostatic Utility Control , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[30]  J. Torriti,et al.  Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation , 2010 .

[31]  Ruggero Schleicher-Tappeser,et al.  How renewables will change electricity markets in the next five years , 2012 .

[32]  Yunwei Sun,et al.  Optimization of pump-treat-inject (PTI) design for the remediation of a contaminated aquifer: multi-stage design with chance constraints , 1998 .

[33]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Management of multiple congested conditions in unbundled operation of a power system , 1997 .