Safety culture and reasons for risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company : Investigating the worker perspective

Workers in the steel-manufacturing industry face many safety risks due to the nature of the job. How well safety procedures and regulations are followed within an organization is considered to be influenced by the reigning culture of the organization. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe safety culture and risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company in Sweden by exploring workers’ experiences and perceptions of safety and risks. Ten focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 66 workers. In the interviews, the situation of safety at work was discussed in a semi-structured manner. The material was analyzed inductively using qualitative content analysis. The analysis resulted in a thorough description of safety culture and risk-taking at the company, based on the following five main categories: 1. Acceptance of risks, one simply has to accept the safety risks of the work environment, 2. Individual responsibility for safety, the responsibility for safe procedures rests to the largest extent on the individual, 3. Trade-off between productivity and safety, these are conflicting entities, wanting to produce as well as wanting to work safely, 4. Importance of communication, it is needed for safety actions to be effective, and 5. State-of-the-day and external conditions, an interplay between these factors affect risk-taking. In sociotechnical systems theory it is acknowledged that there are interactions between social and technical factors in organizations. The findings of this study are interpreted to be in line with a sociotechnical understanding of safety culture and risk-taking.

[1]  Kari Skarholt,et al.  The role of standardization in safety management – A case study of a major oil & gas company , 2012 .

[2]  A. Hale,et al.  Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review , 2013 .

[3]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[4]  Hortense Blazsin,et al.  The social construction of safety: Comparing three realities , 2015 .

[5]  Christian Koch,et al.  Integration, differentiation and ambiguity in safety cultures , 2004 .

[6]  Dongping Fang,et al.  The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art , 2007 .

[7]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[8]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  Safety Culture: Theory, Method and Improvement , 2012 .

[9]  Jussi Turtiainen,et al.  Men of Steel?: The Masculinity of Metal Industry Workers in Finland after World War II , 2012 .

[10]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Occupational health and safety professionals and management: identity, marriage, servitude or supervision? , 1995 .

[11]  Jeremy D. Davey,et al.  Returning to the roots of culture: A review and re-conceptualisation of safety culture , 2013 .

[12]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[13]  Jane Mullen,et al.  Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Assessing the state of organizational safety—culture or climate? , 1999 .

[15]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model , 2000 .

[16]  S. Cox,et al.  Safety Culture: The Prediction of Commitment to Safety in the Manufacturing Industry , 1998 .

[17]  Martina Berglund,et al.  Human, technological and organizational aspects influencing the production scheduling process , 2007 .

[18]  Knut Haukelid.  Theories of (safety) culture revisited—An anthropological approach , 2008 .

[19]  Frank W Guldenmund,et al.  (Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Andrew Hopkins,et al.  Counteracting the Cultural Causes of Disaster , 1999 .

[21]  M. Edwards,et al.  When safety culture backfires: Unintended consequences of half-shared governance in a high tech workplace , 2009 .

[22]  Terence Lee,et al.  Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant , 1998 .

[23]  Marcel Simard,et al.  Workgroups' propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organisational factors , 1997 .

[24]  Nicoletta Cavazza,et al.  Effects of safety climate on safety norm violations: exploring the mediating role of attitudinal ambivalence toward personal protective equipment. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[25]  T. A. Harris,et al.  I'm OK, You're OK , 1967 .

[26]  Arlene Walker,et al.  A qualitative investigation of the safety culture of two organisations , 2008 .

[27]  Marcin Nazaruk,et al.  Developing safety culture interventions in the manufacturing sector , 2011 .

[28]  Treasa M. Turnbeaugh,et al.  Dimensions Of Interpersonal Relationships And Safety In The Steel Industry , 2005 .

[29]  Shinji Teraji,et al.  A theory of norm compliance: Punishment and reputation , 2013 .

[30]  José Manuel Gutiérrez,et al.  Bayesian network analysis of safety culture and organizational culture in a nuclear power plant , 2013 .

[31]  Tor-Olav Nævestad,et al.  Mapping Research on Culture and Safety in High-Risk Organizations: Arguments for a Sociotechnical Understanding of Safety Culture , 2009 .

[32]  Ian Glendon,et al.  Safety culture: Snapshot of a developing concept , 2008 .

[33]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits , 2000 .

[34]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[35]  A. Targoutzidis.  An investigation of the economic perspective in modeling occupational risk , 2011 .

[36]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[37]  J. Nyce,et al.  Setting culture apart: distinguishing culture from behavior and social structure in safety and injury research. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  Diane Hughes,et al.  Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research , 1993 .

[39]  I. Fraser.  Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery for pesticide application, amending Directive 2006/42/EC of 17 May 2006 on machinery for pesticide application , 2010 .

[40]  K. W. Hess,et al.  Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. Volume Five , 2003 .

[41]  T. Thorvaldsen.  The importance of common sense: How Norwegian coastal fishermen deal with occupational risk , 2013 .

[42]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  A systematic review of safety violations in industry. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Wolfgang Battmann,et al.  Behavioural economics and compliance with safety regulations , 1993 .

[44]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  Safety Culture Assessment: A Mission Impossible? , 2009 .

[45]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[46]  Ahmet Atak,et al.  Safety culture in an aircraft maintenance organisation: A view from the inside , 2011 .

[47]  Andrew Hopkins,et al.  Studying organisational cultures and their effects on safety , 2006 .

[48]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[49]  Beatriz Fernández-Muñiz,et al.  Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[50]  Jeremy D. Davey,et al.  Safety leaders' perceptions of safety culture in a large Australian construction organisation , 2013 .