Optimization of Processing Parameters in ECM of Die Tool Steel Using Nanofluid by Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm

Formation of spikes prevents achievement of the better material removal rate (MRR) and surface finish while using plain NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte in electrochemical machining (ECM) of die tool steel. Hence this research work attempts to minimize the formation of spikes in the selected workpiece of high carbon high chromium die tool steel using copper nanoparticles suspended in NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte, that is, nanofluid. The selected influencing parameters are applied voltage and electrolyte discharge rate with three levels and tool feed rate with four levels. Thirty-six experiments were designed using Design Expert 7.0 software and optimization was done using multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA). This tool identified the best possible combination for achieving the better MRR and surface roughness. The results reveal that voltage of 18 V, tool feed rate of 0.54 mm/min, and nanofluid discharge rate of 12 lit/min would be the optimum values in ECM of HCHCr die tool steel. For checking the optimality obtained from the MOGA in MATLAB software, the maximum MRR of 375.78277 mm3/min and respective surface roughness Ra of 2.339779 μm were predicted at applied voltage of 17.688986 V, tool feed rate of 0.5399705 mm/min, and nanofluid discharge rate of 11.998816 lit/min. Confirmatory tests showed that the actual performance at the optimum conditions was 361.214 mm3/min and 2.41 μm; the deviation from the predicted performance is less than 4% which proves the composite desirability of the developed models.

[1]  Adam Ruszaj,et al.  The computer aided simulation of electrochemical process with universal spherical electrodes when machining sculptured surfaces , 2000 .

[2]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Multi-objective meta-heuristics: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Shi Hyoung Ryu,et al.  Electro-chemical micro drilling using ultra short pulses , 2004 .

[4]  B. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Experimental study on electrochemical micromachining , 2005 .

[5]  Ulaş Çaydaş,et al.  A comparative study of surface integrity of Ti–6Al–4V alloy machined by EDM and AECG , 2007 .

[6]  Zinovi Brusilovski Adjustment and readjustment of electrochemical machines and control of the process parameters in machining shaped surfaces , 2008 .

[7]  R. Marappan,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE INFLUENCING PARAMETERS OF ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING OF AISI 202 , 2008 .

[8]  Weiyi Qian,et al.  An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Nonlinear Programming Problems , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[9]  Zhiyong Li,et al.  Machining Accuracy Prediction of Aero-engine Blade in Electrochemical Machining Based on BP Neural Network , 2009 .

[10]  Wei Peng,et al.  Electrochemical machining of the spiral internal turbulator , 2010 .

[11]  S. Yeo,et al.  Investigation of recast layers generated by a powder-mixed dielectric micro electrical discharge machining process , 2011 .

[12]  Vinod Yadava,et al.  Cylindrical Electrochemical Magnetic Abrasive Machining of AISI-304 Stainless Steel , 2013 .

[13]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of the optimal electrochemical machining process parameters using biogeography-based optimization algorithm , 2013 .

[14]  Lin Tang,et al.  Experimental Study of Special Purpose Stainless Steel on Electrochemical Machining of Electrolyte Composition , 2013 .