Towards credible, evidence-based environmental rating ecolabels for consumer products: A proposed framework.

[1]  C. Matthys,et al.  Enviroscore: normalization, weighting, and categorization algorithm to evaluate the relative environmental impact of food and drink products , 2022, npj Science of Food.

[2]  G. Trystram,et al.  Implementing environmental labelling of food products in France , 2022, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  P. Stern,et al.  Revisiting the promise of carbon labelling , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[4]  A. Remmen,et al.  Challenges with product environmental footprint: a systematic review , 2022, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  L. Soler,et al.  Does environmental impact vary widely within the same food category? A case study on industrial pizzas from the French retail market , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Lambert Neumayr,et al.  How to induce sales of sustainable and organic food: The case of a traffic light eco-label in online grocery shopping , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[7]  M. Rayner,et al.  Sustainable food profiling models to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and the environment: a systematic review. , 2021, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[8]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  The evolution of life cycle assessment in European policies over three decades , 2021, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Brian Tjemkes,et al.  A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Food Labelling for Environmental Sustainability: Attitudes, Perceived Barriers, and Solution Approaches towards the “Traffic Light Index” , 2021 .

[10]  R. Griesshammer,et al.  The future of ecolabels , 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[11]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Obligatory inclusion of uncertainty avoids systematic underestimation of Danish pork water use and incentivizes provision of specific inventory data , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Annekatrin Lehmann,et al.  Characterization of environmental labels beyond the criteria of ISO 14020 series , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Pilot Phase—Comparability over Flexibility? , 2018, Sustainability.

[14]  K. Zander,et al.  Consumers' preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries , 2017 .

[15]  Liesbet Vranken,et al.  Food Labeling and Eco-Friendly Consumption: Experimental Evidence From a Belgian Supermarket , 2014 .

[16]  Rana Pant,et al.  Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271) , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  L. Dendler,et al.  Sustainability Meta Labelling: an effective measure to facilitate more sustainable consumption and production? , 2014 .

[19]  P. Upham,et al.  Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions , 2011 .