Coverage of vertebrate species distributions by Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas and Special Protection Areas in the European Union

Abstract The European Union (EU) has an extensive protected area network, including Special Protection Areas (SPAs) designated under the Birds Directive. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) are sites of international significance for birds identified by BirdLife International. Here, we perform EU-wide terrestrial spatial conservation prioritizations to evaluate the coverage of IBAs by SPAs, and the coverage of bird and other vertebrate distributions by IBAs and SPAs. We then investigate the distribution of potential locations for expanding the SPA network that maximize bird species' representation, and the coverage of these locations by IBAs. On average, SPAs cover 23% of the EU-wide distribution of each bird species and 25% of the distributions of amphibians, reptiles and mammals together, while IBAs provide marginally greater coverage. Overall, 76% of terrestrial IBAs in the EU are completely or partially covered by SPAs, and 66% of the IBA network area is covered by SPAs. Our results suggest that SPA designation has been significantly informed by data on the location of IBAs. While IBAs are identified using data on particular bird species of conservation concern, they also tend to have high EU-wide representation of other vertebrates. The designation of new or expanded SPAs covering a relatively small amount of currently unprotected land (particularly in the southern EU) would substantially increase SPA coverage of bird species ranges. Our analysis provides insights on the current contribution that these sites make to conserving vertebrates across the EU, and future possibilities for efficiently expanding the network.

[1]  M. A. Esteve,et al.  Efficiency of a Protected-Area Network in a Mediterranean Region: A Multispecies Assessment with Raptors , 2011, Environmental management.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Araújo,et al.  How well do Important Bird Areas represent species and minimize conservation conflict in the tropical Andes? , 2006 .

[5]  F. M. Pouzols,et al.  Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism , 2014, Nature.

[6]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? , 2012 .

[7]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[8]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Conserving the functional and phylogenetic trees of life of European tetrapods , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  M. Evans,et al.  Important bird areas in Europe : priority sites for conservation , 2000 .

[10]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Threats from Climate Change to Terrestrial Vertebrate Hotspots in Europe , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Can common species benefit from protected areas , 2007 .

[12]  L. Maiorano,et al.  On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[13]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[14]  P. Donald,et al.  The Contributions of the EU Nature Directives to the CBD and Other Multilateral Environmental Agreements , 2016 .

[15]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Pascual López-López,et al.  Are important bird areas and special protected areas enough for conservation?: the case of Bonelli’s eagle in a Mediterranean area , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Assessing the Natura 2000 network with a common breeding birds survey , 2013 .

[18]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation , 2009 .

[19]  L. Joppa,et al.  Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Marc Hockings,et al.  Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? , 2001 .

[22]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity , 2014 .

[23]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds , 2015, Science.

[24]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[25]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[26]  Douglas Evans,et al.  Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network , 2012 .

[27]  Niels Strange,et al.  Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. Watson,et al.  The performance and potential of protected areas , 2014, Nature.

[29]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Voluntary non-monetary approaches for implementing conservation , 2016 .

[30]  M. Wassen,et al.  EU protection is inadequate for a declining flyway population of Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa: mismatch between future core breeding areas and existing Special Protection Areas , 2014, Bird Conservation International.

[31]  Blas M. Benito,et al.  European Bird distribution is “well” represented by Special Protected Areas: Mission accomplished? , 2013 .

[32]  Philip A. Stephens,et al.  Assessing the Performance of EU Nature Legislation in Protecting Target Bird Species in an Era of Climate Change , 2016 .

[33]  K. Böhning‐Gaese,et al.  Birds protected by national legislation show improved population trends in Eastern Europe , 2014 .

[34]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates , 2007 .

[35]  D. Noble,et al.  Developing indicators for European birds , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  C. Boyd,et al.  Spatial scale and the conservation of threatened species , 2008 .

[37]  R. Gregory,et al.  International Conservation Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe , 2007, Science.