Shapes in the Shadow: Evolutionary Dynamics of Morphogenesis

This article investigates the evolutionary dynamics of morphogenesis. In this study, morphogenesis arises as a side-effect of maximization of number of cell types. Thus, it investigates the evolutionary dynamics of side-effects. Morphogenesis is governed by the interplay between differential cell adhesion, gene-regulation, and intercellular signaling. Thus, it investigates the potential to generate complex behavior by entanglement of relatively boring processes, and the (automatic) coordination between these processes. The evolutionary dynamics shows all the hallmarks of evolutionary dynamics governed by nonlinear genotype phenotype mapping: for example, punctuated equilibria and diffusion on neutral paths. More striking is the result that interesting, complex morphogenesis occurs mainly in the shadow of neutral paths which preserve cell differentiation, that is, the interesting morphologies arise as mutants of the fittest individuals. Characteristics of the evolution of such side-effects in the shadow appear to be the following: (1) The specific complex morphologies are unique (or at least very rare) among the set of de novo initiated evolutionary histories. (2) Similar morphologies are reinvented at large temporal distances during one evolutionary history and also when evolution is restarted after the main cell differentiation pattern has been established. (3) A mosaic-like evolution at the morphological level, where different morphological features occur in many combinations, while at the genotypic level recombination is not implemented and genotypes diverge linearly and at a constant rate.

[1]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Mathematical biology , 1961, Connecticut medicine.

[2]  S. Kauffman.  Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Mirror Beyond Mirror: Puddles of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[4]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  W. Daniel Hillis,et al.  Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure , 1990 .

[6]  W. Scharloo,et al.  Canalization: Genetic and Developmental Aspects , 1991 .

[7]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Evolution as pattern processing: TODO as substrate for evolution , 1991 .

[8]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[9]  J. M. W. Slack,et al.  The zootype and the phylotypic stage , 1993, Nature.

[10]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Karl Sims,et al.  Evolving 3D Morphology and Behavior by Competition , 1994, Artificial Life.

[12]  L. Altenberg.  The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming , 1994 .

[13]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[14]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. Wagner,et al.  A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Isologous diversification: A theory of cell differentiation , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[17]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Finite populations induce metastability in evolutionary search , 1997 .

[18]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[19]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Coevolving Targets , 1997, Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Stretching Is Good for a Cell , 1997, Science.

[21]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  On searching generic properties of non generic phenomena: an approach to bioinformatic theory formation , 1998 .

[22]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[23]  C. Furusawa,et al.  Emergence of rules in cell society: Differentiation, hierarchy, and stability , 1998, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[24]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Evolving mechanisms of morphogenesis: on the interplay between differential adhesion and cell differentiation. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.