Hydrologic controls on basin‐scale distribution of benthic invertebrates

Streamflow variability is a major determinant of basin-scale distributions of benthic invertebrates. Here we present a novel procedure based on a probabilistic approach aiming at a spatially explicit quantitative assessment of benthic invertebrate abundance as derived from near-bed flow variability. Although the proposed approach neglects ecological determinants other than hydraulic ones, it is nevertheless relevant in view of its implications on the predictability of basin-scale patterns of organisms. In the present context, aquatic invertebrates are considered, given that they are widely employed as sensitive indicators of fluvial ecosystem health and human-induced perturbations. Moving from the analytical characterization of site-specific probability distribution functions of streamflow and bottom shear stress, we achieve a spatial extension to an entire stream network. Bottom shear stress distributions, coupled with habitat suitability curves derived from field studies, are used to produce maps of invertebrate suitability to shear stress conditions. Therefore, the proposed framework allows one to inspect the possible impacts on river ecology of human-induced perturbations of streamflow variability. We apply this framework to an Austrian river network for which rainfall and streamflow time series, river network hydraulic properties, and local information on invertebrate abundance for a limited number of sites are available. A comparison between observed species density versus modeled suitability to shear stress is also presented. Although the proposed strategy focuses on a single controlling factor and thus represents an ecological minimal model, it allows derivation of important implications for water resource management and fluvial ecosystem protection. Key Points Hydrologic variability is a major control of invertebrate habitat suitability New analytical basin-scale approach for pdfs of ecohydrological key features Austrian river basin used for ecohydrological data-model comparison

[1]  Evan H. Campbell Grant,et al.  Interbasin Water Transfer, Riverine Connectivity, and Spatial Controls on Fish Biodiversity , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[3]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[4]  B. Statzner,et al.  Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research , 1989 .

[5]  V. Isham,et al.  Probabilistic modelling of water balance at a point: the role of climate, soil and vegetation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  A. Milner,et al.  Evolution of a stream ecosystem in recently deglaciated terrain. , 2011, Ecology.

[7]  Jill Lancaster,et al.  Flow Refugia and the Microdistribution of Lotic Macroinvertebrates , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[8]  R. Cowling,et al.  Designing Large‐Scale Conservation Corridors for Pattern and Process , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  River networks as ecological corridors: A complex systems perspective for integrating hydrologic, geomorphologic, and ecologic dynamics , 2009 .

[10]  R. Rosso,et al.  Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics , 1998 .

[11]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  A multiobjective ant colony optimization approach for scheduling environmental flow management alternatives with application to the River Murray, Australia , 2013 .

[12]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[13]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Changing risk of predation for a filter-feeding insect along a current velocity gradient , 1996, Oecologia.

[14]  E. Stacy A Generalization of the Gamma Distribution , 1962 .

[15]  J. Ackerman,et al.  Microdistribution of a torrential stream invertebrate: Are bottom‐up, top‐down, or hydrodynamic controls most important? , 2011 .

[16]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Hydraulic Food-Chain ModelsAn approach to the study of food-web dynamics in large rivers , 1995 .

[18]  M. Chadwick Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters , 2008 .

[19]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Modelling the hydraulic preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in small European streams , 2007 .

[20]  J. Gore,et al.  Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: A role in stream management and restoration , 2001 .

[21]  Jorge Gironás,et al.  A stochastic model of streamflow for urbanized basins , 2014 .

[22]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Signatures of large‐scale soil moisture dynamics on streamflow statistics across U.S. climate regimes , 2007 .

[23]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Temporal scales and hydrological regimes: Implications for flood frequency scaling , 1997 .

[24]  Maciej Zalewski,et al.  Ecohydrology: a new paradigm for the sustainable use of aquatic resources , 1997 .

[25]  C. Quince,et al.  Headwaters are critical reservoirs of microbial diversity for fluvial networks , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Ecohydrological model of flow duration curves and annual minima , 2008 .

[27]  Aronne Armanini,et al.  A one-dimensional model for the transport of a sediment mixture in non-equilibrium conditions , 1988 .

[28]  TRANSFERABILITY OF HYDRAULIC PREFERENCE MODELS FOR AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES , 2013 .

[29]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Ecohydrology of Water-Controlled Ecosystems: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics , 2005 .

[30]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Natural streamflow regime alterations: Damming of the Piave river basin (Italy) , 2010 .

[31]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Geomorphological signatures of varying climate , 1995, Nature.

[32]  Aaron I. Packman,et al.  Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks , 2008 .

[33]  Christopher W. Hickey,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates and the development of generalised Deleatidium spp. habitat suitability curves, applied to four New Zealand rivers , 1991 .

[34]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Flow‐Duration Curves. I: New Interpretation and Confidence Intervals , 1994 .

[35]  D. Hart,et al.  PHYSICAL-BIOLOGICAL COUPLING IN STREAMS: The Pervasive Effects of Flow on Benthic Organisms , 1999 .

[36]  N. Poff,et al.  Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Heterogeneous currents and algal resources mediate in situ foraging activity of a mobile stream grazer , 1992 .

[38]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  How does floodplain width affect floodplain river ecology? A preliminary exploration using simulations , 1995 .

[39]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[40]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Ecological Consequences of Sea-Ice Decline , 2013, Science.

[41]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Basin‐scale soil moisture dynamics and the probabilistic characterization of carrier hydrologic flows: Slow, leaching‐prone components of the hydrologic response , 2007 .

[42]  W. Fagan CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[43]  W. McDowell,et al.  Scaling the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small rivers , 2012 .

[44]  R. Sparks,et al.  The Natural Flow Regime , 2006 .

[45]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[46]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate‐soil‐vegetation dynamies , 2000 .

[47]  Stephen P. Rice,et al.  Flow‐ and substratum‐mediated movement by a stream insect , 2006 .

[48]  Jean-Michel Olivier,et al.  Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river. , 2009 .

[49]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  Relationships between invertebrate communities and both hydrological regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand's rivers , 2015 .

[50]  S. Levin,et al.  A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  B. Biggs,et al.  Ecological characterisation, classification, and modelling of New Zealand rivers: An introduction and synthesis , 1990 .

[52]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  J. Richardson,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates in a New Zealand river and the development of in‐stream flow‐habitat models for Deleatidium spp. , 1990 .

[54]  A. Armanini,et al.  Non-uniform sediment transport: dynamics of the active layer , 1995 .

[55]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Spatial effects on species persistence and implications for biodiversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin , 2008, Nature.

[57]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Hydrologic Variability Affects Invertebrate Grazing on Phototrophic Biofilms in Stream Microcosms , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  On the geographic range of freshwater fish in river basins , 2009 .

[59]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Comparative study of ecohydrological streamflow probability distributions , 2010 .

[60]  Evan P Economo,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation in Metacommunity Networks: Linking Pattern and Persistence , 2011, The American Naturalist.