Comparison of soil moisture retrieval algorithms based on the synergy between SMAP and SMOS-IC

Abstract This study was carried out to evaluate possible improvements of the soil moisture (SM) retrievals from the SMAP observations, based on the synergy between SMAP and SMOS. We assessed the impacts of the vegetation and soil roughness parameters on SM retrievals from SMAP observations. To do so, the effects of three key input parameters including the vegetation optical depth (VOD), effective scattering albedo (ω) and soil roughness (HR) parameters were assessed with the emphasis on the synergy with the VOD product derived from SMOS-IC, a new and simpler version of the SMOS algorithm, over two years of data (April 2015 to April 2017). First, a comprehensive comparison of seven SM retrieval algorithms was made to find the best one for SM retrievals from the SMAP observations. All results were evaluated against in situ measurements over 548 stations from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) in terms of four statistical metrics: correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), bias and unbiased RMSE (UbRMSE). The comparison of seven SM retrieval algorithms showed that the dual channel algorithm based on the additional use of the SMOS-IC VOD product (selected algorithm) led to the best results of SM retrievals over 378, 399, 330 and 271 stations (out of a total of 548 stations) in terms of R, RMSE, UbRMSE and both R & UbRMSE, respectively. Moreover, comparing the measured and retrieved SM values showed that this synergy approach led to an increase in median R value from 0.6 to 0.65 and a decrease in median UbRMSE from 0.09 m3/m3 to 0.06 m3/m3. Second, using the algorithm selected in a first step and defined above, the ω and HR parameters were calibrated over 218 rather homogenous ISMN stations. 72 combinations of various values of ω and HR were used for the calibration over different land cover classes. In this calibration process, the optimal values of ω and HR were found for the different land cover classes. The obtained results indicated that the impact of the VOD parameter on SM retrievals is more considerable than the effects of HR and ω. Overall, the inclusion of the VOD parameter in the SMAP SM retrieval algorithm was found to be a very interesting approach and showed the large potential benefit of the synergy between SMAP and SMOS.

[1]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Remote sensing of soil moisture content over bare field at 1.4 GHz frequency , 1981 .

[2]  Klaus Seidel,et al.  Toward Snowmelt Runoff Forecast Based on Multisensor Remote-Sensing Informnation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  B. Gao.  NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space , 1996 .

[4]  T. Jackson,et al.  III. Measuring surface soil moisture using passive microwave remote sensing , 1993 .

[5]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Considering combined or separated roughness and vegetation effects in soil moisture retrievals , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  Arnaud Carrara,et al.  Varying applicability of four different satellite-derived soil moisture products to global gridded crop model evaluation , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part II: Dielectric Mixing Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Two-Dimensional Microwave Interferometer Retrieval Capabilities over Land Surfaces (SMOS Mission) , 2000 .

[9]  A. Al Bitar,et al.  SMOS soil moisture product evaluation over West-Africa from local to regional scale , 2015 .

[10]  Edward J. Kim,et al.  Evaluation of the SMOS L-MEB passive microwave soil moisture retrieval algorithm. , 2009 .

[11]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling by using SM2RAIN-derived and state-of-the-art satellite rainfall products over Italy , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[12]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Preliminary validation of two temporal parameter-based soil moisture retrieval models using a satellite product and in situ soil moisture measurements over the REMEDHUS network , 2016 .

[13]  T. Schmugge,et al.  An Empirical Model for the Complex Dielectric Permittivity of Soils as a Function of Water Content , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Y. Kerr,et al.  L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB) Model: Description and calibration against experimental data sets over crop fields , 2007 .

[15]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  On the importance of satellite observed soil moisture , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[16]  P. M. Salgado-Hernanz,et al.  Roughness and vegetation parameterizations at L-band for soil moisture retrievals over a vineyard field , 2015 .

[17]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  SMOS-IC: An Alternative SMOS Soil Moisture and Vegetation Optical Depth Product , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Pere Quintana-Seguí,et al.  Comparison of remote sensing and simulated soil moisture datasets in Mediterranean landscapes , 2016 .

[19]  A. Robock,et al.  The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements , 2011 .

[20]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Improving Landslide Forecasting Using ASCAT-Derived Soil Moisture Data: A Case Study of the Torgiovannetto Landslide in Central Italy , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Simonetta Paloscia,et al.  Remote monitoring of soil moisture using passive microwave-based techniques — Theoretical basis and overview of selected algorithms for AMSR-E , 2014 .

[22]  Y. Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mediterranean Ecosystem L-Band characterisation EXperiment (MELBEX-I) over natural shrubs , 2010 .

[23]  Giorgio Boni,et al.  Impact of different satellite soil moisture products on the predictions of a continuous distributed hydrological model , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[24]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Satellite soil moisture for advancing our understanding of earth system processes and climate change , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[26]  G. Leavesley,et al.  A MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVED AGRICULTURAL WATER-SUPPLY FORECASTING , 2010 .

[27]  Catherine Champagne,et al.  Impact of sub-pixel heterogeneity on modelled brightness temperature for an agricultural region , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[28]  N. Bruguier,et al.  A simple algorithm to retrieve soil moisture and vegetation biomass using passive microwave measurements over crop fields , 1995 .

[29]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  A Wireless Soil Moisture Smart Sensor Web Using Physics-Based Optimal Control: Concept and Initial Demonstrations , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[30]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations , 2012 .

[31]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) , 2008 .

[32]  P. Sellers.  Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[33]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on the microwave emission from soils , 1979 .

[34]  Hugo Carrão,et al.  An empirical standardized soil moisture index for agricultural drought assessment from remotely sensed data , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[35]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Soil moisture mapping at regional scales using microwave radiometry: the Southern Great Plains Hydrology Experiment , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[36]  Heather McNairn,et al.  Calibration and Evaluation of a Frequency Domain Reflectometry Sensor for Real‐Time Soil Moisture Monitoring , 2015 .

[37]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Assimilation of ASCAT near-surface soil moisture into the SIM hydrological model over France , 2011 .

[38]  T. Jackson,et al.  The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) , 2007 .

[39]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part 1: Empirical Models and Experimental Observations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[41]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Global net carbon exchange and intra‐annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model , 1996 .

[42]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Vegetation optical depth and scattering albedo retrieval using time series of dual-polarized L-band radiometer observations , 2016 .

[43]  James R. Wang,et al.  Multifrequency Measurements of the Effects of Soil Moisture, Soil Texture, And Surface Roughness , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[44]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Improving terrestrial evaporation estimates over continental Australia through assimilation of SMOS soil moisture , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[45]  Daoyi Chen,et al.  Satellite-sensed distribution and spatial patterns of vegetation parameters over a tallgrass prairie , 1998 .

[46]  C. Albergel,et al.  An evaluation of ASCAT surface soil moisture products with in-situ observations in Southwestern France , 2008 .

[47]  A. Al Bitar,et al.  Modelling the Passive Microwave Signature from Land Surfaces: A Review of Recent Results and Application to the L-Band SMOS SMAP Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithms , 2017 .

[48]  A. Al Bitar,et al.  Evaluating soil moisture retrievals from ESA's SMOS and NASA's SMAP brightness temperature datasets. , 2017, Remote sensing of environment.

[49]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  L-band vegetation optical depth and effective scattering albedo estimation from SMAP. , 2017 .

[50]  C. Albergel,et al.  From near-surface to root-zone soil moisture using an exponential filter: an assessment of the method based on in-situ observations and model simulations , 2008 .

[51]  Yann Kerr,et al.  N-parameter retrievals from L-band microwave observations acquired over a variety of crop fields , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[52]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  A new calibration of the effective scattering albedo and soil roughness parameters in the SMOS SM retrieval algorithm , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[53]  Valery L. Mironov,et al.  Physically and Mineralogically Based Spectroscopic Dielectric Model for Moist Soils , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[54]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Comparison of SMOS and SMAP soil moisture retrieval approaches using tower-based radiometer data over a vineyard field , 2014 .

[55]  T. Mo,et al.  A model for microwave emission from vegetation‐covered fields , 1982 .

[56]  John Kochendorfer,et al.  U.S. Climate Reference Network Soil Moisture and Temperature Observations , 2013 .

[57]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  On the measurement of microwave vegetation properties: some guidelines for a protocol , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[58]  Fawwaz Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Attenuation Properties of Vegetation Canopies , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[59]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.