An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND There is considerable interest in the effectiveness of financial incentives in the delivery of health care. Incentives may be used in an attempt to increase the use of evidence-based treatments among healthcare professionals or to stimulate health professionals to change their clinical behaviour with respect to preventive, diagnostic and treatment decisions, or both. Financial incentives are an extrinsic source of motivation and exist when an individual can expect a monetary transfer which is made conditional on acting in a particular way. Since there are numerous reviews performed within the healthcare area describing the effects of various types of financial incentives, it is important to summarise the effectiveness of these in an overview to discern which are most effective in changing health professionals' behaviour and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES To conduct an overview of systematic reviews that evaluates the impact of financial incentives on healthcare professional behaviour and patient outcomes. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) (The Cochrane Library); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE); TRIP; MEDLINE; EMBASE; Science Citation Index; Social Science Citation Index; NHS EED; HEED; EconLit; and Program in Policy Decision-Making (PPd) (from their inception dates up to January 2010). We searched the reference lists of all included reviews and carried out a citation search of those papers which cited studies included in the review. We included both Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), interrupted time series (ITSs) and controlled before and after studies (CBAs) that evaluated the effects of financial incentives on professional practice and patient outcomes, and that reported numerical results of the included individual studies. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of each review according to the AMSTAR criteria. We included systematic reviews of studies evaluating the effectiveness of any type of financial incentive. We grouped financial incentives into five groups: payment for working for a specified time period; payment for each service, episode or visit; payment for providing care for a patient or specific population; payment for providing a pre-specified level or providing a change in activity or quality of care; and mixed or other systems. We summarised data using vote counting. MAIN RESULTS We identified four reviews reporting on 32 studies. Two reviews scored 7 on the AMSTAR criteria (moderate, score 5 to 7, quality) and two scored 9 (high, score 8 to 11, quality). The reported quality of the included studies was, by a variety of methods, low to moderate. Payment for working for a specified time period was generally ineffective, improving 3/11 outcomes from one study reported in one review. Payment for each service, episode or visit was generally effective, improving 7/10 outcomes from five studies reported in three reviews; payment for providing care for a patient or specific population was generally effective, improving 48/69 outcomes from 13 studies reported in two reviews; payment for providing a pre-specified level or providing a change in activity or quality of care was generally effective, improving 17/20 reported outcomes from 10 studies reported in two reviews; and mixed and other systems were of mixed effectiveness, improving 20/31 reported outcomes from seven studies reported in three reviews. When looking at the effect of financial incentives overall across categories of outcomes, they were of mixed effectiveness on consultation or visit rates (improving 10/17 outcomes from three studies in two reviews); generally effective in improving processes of care (improving 41/57 outcomes from 19 studies in three reviews); generally effective in improving referrals and admissions (improving 11/16 outcomes from 11 studies in four reviews); generally ineffective in improving compliance with guidelines outcomes (improving 5/17 outcomes from five studies in two reviews); and generally effective in improving prescribing costs outcomes (improving 28/34 outcomes from 10 studies in one review). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Financial incentives may be effective in changing healthcare professional practice. The evidence has serious methodological limitations and is also very limited in its completeness and generalisability. We found no evidence from reviews that examined the effect of financial incentives on patient outcomes.

[1]  B. Güther.  [Effects of the Health Structure Regulation on prescribing behavior of established physicians]. , 1995, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[2]  B. Leese,et al.  Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. , 1999, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Anne Frølich,et al.  A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. , 2007, Health policy.

[4]  J. Graf von der Schulenburg,et al.  Unintended effects of a cost-containment policy: results of a natural experiment in Germany. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Sheila Leatherman,et al.  Lessons From Evaluations of Purchaser Pay-for-Performance Programs , 2008, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[6]  M. Cabana,et al.  Physician Compensation Programs in Academic Medical Centers , 2006, Health care management review.

[7]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[8]  A. Hillman,et al.  The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care , 1999, Pediatrics.

[9]  A. Kinnear,et al.  The extent of the two tier service for fundholders , 1996, BMJ.

[10]  L Pedersen,et al.  How should we pay doctors? A systematic review of salary payments and their effect on doctor behaviour. , 1999, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[11]  Robert West,et al.  About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). , 2011 .

[12]  T. Bärnighausen,et al.  Financial incentives for return of service in underserved areas: a systematic review , 2009, BMC health services research.

[13]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  D. Torgerson,et al.  The effect of fundholding on prescribing and referral costs: a review of the evidence. , 1997, Health policy.

[15]  T. Walley,et al.  Therapeutic substitution and therapeutic conservatism as cost-containment strategies in primary care: a study of fundholders and non-fundholders. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  A. Scott,et al.  Evaluating the effects of GP remuneration: problems and prospects. , 1995, Health policy.

[17]  James C. Robinson,et al.  Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[18]  A. Stergachis,et al.  Frequency and characteristics of cognitive services provided in response to a financial incentive. , 2000, Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association.

[19]  G. Fairbrother,et al.  The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[20]  Yujing Shen,et al.  Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. , 2003, Health services research.

[21]  Walter Sermeus,et al.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care , 2010, BMC health services research.

[22]  Robert H. Miller,et al.  The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care. , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[24]  Martin Roland,et al.  Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  T. Walley,et al.  Effects of a monetary incentive on primary care prescribing in Ireland: changes in prescribing patterns in one health board 1990–1995 , 2000, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[26]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care? , 2006, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[27]  Scholten,et al.  Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice. , 1990, BMJ.

[28]  R. Kane,et al.  Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  A. Aromaa,et al.  Specialists as consultants to GPs. Private sector services as an alternative way of organising consultant services in health care. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[30]  C. Harris,et al.  Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years , 1996, BMJ.

[31]  Tony Delamothe,et al.  Open access publishing takes off , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  M. Burgess,et al.  Health care incentives in immunisation , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[33]  P. Anderson.  Overview of interventions to enhance primary-care provider management of patients with substance-use disorders. , 2009, Drug and alcohol review.

[34]  A. Hillman,et al.  Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[35]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Ulrike Dapp,et al.  Development, feasibility and performance of a health risk appraisal questionnaire for older persons , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[37]  B. Rimer,et al.  Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  F M LaForce,et al.  Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[39]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing Clinicians’ Behavior: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fees and Education , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[40]  R. Corney,et al.  Fundholding in the south Thames Region. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[41]  G. Mooney,et al.  Agency in health care: getting beyond first principles. , 1993, Journal of health economics.

[42]  H. Mcgavock,et al.  How has fundholding in Northern Ireland affected prescribing patterns? A longitudinal study , 1997, BMJ.

[43]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  I. Buchan,et al.  Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study , 1995, BMJ.

[45]  B Leese,et al.  Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[46]  Shu-Hong Zhu,et al.  The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[47]  B. Frey.  Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[48]  J. Lemkau,et al.  Enhancing mammography referral in primary care. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[49]  M. Lagarde,et al.  Evidence from systematic reviews to inform decision making regarding financing mechanisms that improve access to health services for poor people , 2006 .

[50]  S M Davidson,et al.  Prepayment with office-based physicians in publicly funded programs: results from the Children's Medicaid Program. , 1992, Pediatrics.

[51]  J. Sandars,et al.  Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[52]  D. Whynes,et al.  GP fundholding and the costs of prescribing: further results. , 1997, Journal of public health medicine.

[53]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. , 2005, JAMA.

[54]  P. Kory,et al.  Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association.

[55]  W A Altemeier,et al.  Physician reimbursement by salary or fee-for-service: effect on physician practice behavior in a randomized prospective study. , 1987, Pediatrics.

[56]  Nancy Dean Beaulieu,et al.  Putting smart money to work for quality improvement. , 2005, Health services research.

[57]  F. Sampogna,et al.  Financial systems' impact on dental care; a review of fee-for-service and capitation systems. , 2007, Community dental health.

[58]  L. Ritchie,et al.  Primary and preschool immunisation in Grampian: progress and the 1990 contract. , 1992, BMJ.

[59]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[60]  M. Schatz.  Does pay-for-performance influence the quality of care? , 2008, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[61]  R. Walker,et al.  IMPACT OF FUNDHOLDING ON GENERAL PRACTICE PRESCRIBING PATTERNS , 1992 .

[62]  R. Drake,et al.  Incentives for Community Treatment Mental Illness Management Services , 1995, Medical care.

[63]  B Leese,et al.  Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[64]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  The Rx for Change database: a first-in-class tool for optimal prescribing and medicines use , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[65]  A Coulter,et al.  Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs. , 1993, BMJ.

[66]  J Hurley,et al.  Do physician-payment mechanisms affect hospital utilization? A study of Health Service Organizations in Ontario. , 1996, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[67]  D. Sackett,et al.  Cochrane Collaboration , 1994, BMJ.

[68]  J. Car,et al.  Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review , 2010, Journal of health services research & policy.

[69]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[70]  A. Oxman,et al.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[71]  A. Mason,et al.  New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing , 2008, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[72]  Laura Petersen,et al.  Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care? , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[73]  P. Burns,et al.  The implementation and impact of different funding initiatives on access to multidisciplinary primary health care and policy implications , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.