Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting.

BACKGROUND Electronic health records (EHRs), in combination with health information exchange, are being promoted in the United States as a strategy for improving quality of care. No single metric set exists for measuring the effectiveness of these interventions. A set of quality metrics was sought that could be retrieved electronically and would be sensitive to the changes in quality that EHRs with health information exchange may contribute to ambulatory care. METHODS A literature search identified quality metric sets for ambulatory care. Two rounds of quantitative rating of individual metrics were conducted. Metrics were developed de novo to capture additional expected effects of EHRs with health information exchange. A 36-member national expert panel validated the rating process and final metric set. RESULTS Seventeen metric sets containing 1,064 individual metrics were identified; 510 metrics met inclusion criteria. Two rounds of rating narrowed these to 59 metrics and then to 18. The final 18 consisted of metrics for asthma, cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, medication and allergy documentation, mental health, osteoporosis, and prevention. Fourteen metrics were developed de novo to address test ordering, medication management, referrals, follow-up after discharge, and revisits. DISCUSSION The novel set of 32 metrics is proposed as suitable for electronic reporting to capture the potential quality effects of EHRs with health information exchange. This metric set may have broad utility as health information technology becomes increasingly common with funding from the federal stimulus package and other sources. This work may also stimulate discussion on improving how data are entered and extracted from clinically rich, electronic sources, with the goal of more accurately measuring and improving care.

[1]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults with Chronic Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Performance Measures): endorsed by the Heart Failure Society , 2005, Circulation.

[2]  Ann S O'Malley,et al.  Primary Care Physicians' Links to Other Physicians Through Medicare Patients: The Scope of Care Coordination , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Paul C Tang,et al.  Research Paper: Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System: Implications for Performance Measures , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. , 2009, Health affairs.

[5]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority Areas for National Action , 2003 .

[6]  W. Manz.,et al.  President Obama's response to the economic crisis : the legislative history of the American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 (Pub.L. 111-5) , 2009 .

[7]  J. Westfall,et al.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits. , 2005, JAMA.

[8]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[9]  T. Fukui,et al.  2.Quality Indicators , 2010 .

[10]  R. Chaudhry,et al.  Implementation of a medication reconciliation process in an ambulatory internal medicine clinic , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  Tejal K. Gandhi,et al.  Design and implementation of an application and associated services to support interdisciplinary medication reconciliation efforts at an integrated healthcare delivery network. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[12]  C. van Walraven,et al.  Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Information technology comes to medicine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[16]  R. Hayward,et al.  Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: a case for the next generation of technical quality measures. , 2001, The American journal of managed care.

[17]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.