The Mediating Effect of KM Capabilities: Evidence from the Manufacturing and Technology Industries

Based upon the theory of technology assimilation, information technology (IT) use for knowledge management (KM) is modeled to affect KM capabilities, which in turn affect KM effectiveness. A survey of 108 managers from manufacturing and technology industries indicates that IT support for KM had a significant positive relationship with KM capabilities and, in turn, affected the KM effectiveness. No significant direct relationship was detected between IT use for KM and KM effectiveness, indicating that KM capabilities variable is a full mediator. The results provide explanation for the lack of a direct link between IT use of KM and KM effectiveness and provides a potential framework for studies examining the impacts of other types of IT investments on KM effectiveness or success. The results also suggest that investments in IT use for KM must be carefully evaluated in terms of strategic directions to positively impact KM effectiveness as well as organisational performance. KeywordsKnowledge management; IT use; KM capabilities; technology assimilation

[1]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy, and Knowledge Platforms , 2002 .

[2]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Ramón Valle-Cabrera,et al.  Internal diversification strategies and the processes of knowledge creation , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[5]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Peter Tyndale.  A taxonomy of knowledge management software tools: origins and applications , 2002 .

[7]  I-Chiu Chang,et al.  An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers' acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems , 2005, Government Information Quarterly.

[8]  Donald Hislop,et al.  Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  M. Rao.  Chapter 1 – Overview: The Social Life of KM Tools , 2005 .

[10]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  The New Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[11]  Con Connell.  The New Knowledge Management – Complexity, Learning and Sustainable Innovation , 2003 .

[12]  Mohamed Khalifa,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS , 2003 .

[13]  K. Wiig.  Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking About Thinking - How People and Organizations Represent, Create and Use Knowledge , 1994 .

[14]  R. Ruggles.  The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice , 1998 .

[15]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[16]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[17]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[19]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[20]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Shih-Wei Chou.  Computer systems to facilitating organizational learning: IT and organizational context , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[23]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Sandra Moffett,et al.  Technological utilization for knowledge management , 2004 .

[25]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel , 2000 .

[26]  Mu-Yen Chen,et al.  Integrating option model and knowledge management performance measures: an empirical study , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Uday R. Kulkarni,et al.  A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Performance of knowledge management practices: a causal analysis , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies , 2002 .

[30]  Tzu-Chuan Chou,et al.  Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[32]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  Impact of social capital and business operation mode on intellectual capital and knowledge management , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[33]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  The New Knowledge Management: Complexity,Learning,and Sustainable Innovation , 2002 .

[34]  Ita Richardson,et al.  Identification of Software Process Knowledge Management , 2002, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[35]  Tony Holden,et al.  Where does knowledge management add value , 2000 .

[36]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[37]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[38]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[39]  Ángel L. Meroño-Cerdán,et al.  Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Gary Klein,et al.  IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance , 2007 .

[43]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Strategic Knowledge Networks: The Case of IT Support for Eurojuris Law Firms in Norway , 2000 .

[44]  Svein Ottar Olsen,et al.  Export market information use, organizational knowledge, and firm performance , 2003 .

[45]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[46]  Peter J. Sher,et al.  Information Technology as a Facilitator of Enhancing Dynamic Capability through Knowledge Management , 2020 .