Comparison of normalization methods for Illumina BeadChip HumanHT-12 v3

BackgroundNormalization of microarrays is a standard practice to account for and minimize effects which are not due to the controlled factors in an experiment. There is an overwhelming number of different methods that can be applied, none of which is ideally suited for all experimental designs. Thus, it is important to identify a normalization method appropriate for the experimental setup under consideration that is neither too negligent nor too stringent. Major aim is to derive optimal results from the underlying experiment. Comparisons of different normalization methods have already been conducted, none of which, to our knowledge, comparing more than a handful of methods.ResultsIn the present study, 25 different ways of pre-processing Illumina Sentrix BeadChip array data are compared. Among others, methods provided by the BeadStudio software are taken into account. Looking at different statistical measures, we point out the ideal versus the actual observations. Additionally, we compare qRT-PCR measurements of transcripts from different ranges of expression intensities to the respective normalized values of the microarray data. Taking together all different kinds of measures, the ideal method for our dataset is identified.ConclusionsPre-processing of microarray gene expression experiments has been shown to influence further downstream analysis to a great extent and thus has to be carefully chosen based on the design of the experiment. This study provides a recommendation for deciding which normalization method is best suited for a particular experimental setup.

[1]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[2]  J. Ernst,et al.  A fluorometric assay for the quantification of RNA in solution with nanogram sensitivity. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[6]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[7]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression , 2002, ISMB.

[9]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[10]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[11]  X. Cui,et al.  Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments , 2003, Genome Biology.

[12]  Benjamin M. Bolstad,et al.  affy - analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level , 2004, Bioinform..

[13]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A benchmark for Affymetrix GeneChip expression measures , 2004, Bioinform..

[14]  Philippe Rigault,et al.  A novel, high-performance random array platform for quantitative gene expression profiling. , 2004, Genome research.

[15]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2011 .

[16]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[17]  Michael G. Barnes,et al.  Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the Affymetrix and Illumina gene expression analysis platforms , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  K. Gunderson,et al.  Illumina, Inc. , 2005, Pharmacogenomics.

[19]  W. Kibbe,et al.  Using lumi , a package processing Illumina Microarray , 2007 .

[20]  Kai Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[21]  Simon Tavaré,et al.  Statistical issues in the analysis of Illumina data , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Jiannis Ragoussis,et al.  Comparative analysis of methods for gene transcription profiling data derived from different microarray technologies in rat and mouse models of diabetes , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[23]  W. Huber,et al.  Model-based variance-stabilizing transformation for Illumina microarray data , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Yang Xie,et al.  Enhanced identification and biological validation of differential gene expression via Illumina whole-genome expression arrays through the use of the model-based background correction methodology , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Matthew E Ritchie,et al.  Spike-in validation of an Illumina-specific variance-stabilizing transformation , 2008, BMC Research Notes.

[26]  Xiaohua Hu,et al.  Methods for evaluating gene expression from Affymetrix microarray datasets , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[27]  Pan Du,et al.  lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray , 2008, Bioinform..

[28]  R. Irizarry,et al.  Consolidated strategy for the analysis of microarray spike-in data , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Yang Xie,et al.  Statistical methods of background correction for Illumina BeadArray data , 2009, Bioinform..

[30]  Ibrahim Emam,et al.  ArrayExpress update—from an archive of functional genomics experiments to the atlas of gene expression , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  A. Noordhof,et al.  In the absence of a gold standard , 2010 .