Cognitive outcome after ventral capsule/ventral striatum stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression

Background We report the neuropsychological outcome of 25 patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD) who participated in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomised double-blind trial comparing active to sham deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the anterior limb of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS). Methods Participants were randomised to active (n=12) versus sham (n=13) DBS for 16 weeks. Data were analysed at the individual and group levels. Group differences were analysed using repeated measures ANOVAs. Relationships between depression severity and cognition were examined using partial correlations. The false discovery rate method controlled for multiple analyses. Results No significant interactions comparing active versus sham stimulation over time were evident. Change in depression was unrelated to change in neuropsychological measures. Twenty patients declined by ≥1 SD on at least one measure (41.3% of declines occurred in active group participants; 63.0% in older participants regardless of stimulation status). Twenty-two patients exhibited improvements >1 SD on neuropsychological measures (47.7% in the active group; 63.1% in younger participants). Conclusions These data suggest that VC/VS DBS in patients with TRD does not significantly affect neuropsychological function. Age at surgery, regardless of stimulation status, may be related to cognitive outcome at the individual patient level. Trial registration number NCT00837486; Results.

[1]  S. Rauch,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  M. Husain,et al.  Association between depression severity and neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder: a review and synthesis. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[3]  Sidney H. Kennedy,et al.  Neuropsychological Impact of Cg25 Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Preliminary Results Over 12 Months , 2008, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[4]  S. Rauch,et al.  Invasive Circuitry-Based Neurotherapeutics: Stereotactic Ablation and Deep Brain Stimulation for OCD , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[5]  J. Diego-Adeliño,et al.  Cognitive functioning after deep brain stimulation in subcallosal cingulate gyrus for treatment-resistant depression: An exploratory study , 2015, Psychiatry Research.

[6]  G. Friehs,et al.  Neuropsychological Outcome after Deep Brain Stimulation in the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Highly Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder or Major Depression , 2013, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[7]  H. Mayberg,et al.  NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION BEFORE AND AFTER SUBCALLOSAL CINGULATE DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT‐RESISTANT DEPRESSION , 2014, Depression and anxiety.

[8]  Nikolai Axmacher,et al.  Neuropsychological safety of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for major depression: Effects of 12-month stimulation , 2011, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  A. Carvalho,et al.  The Prevalence, Measurement, and Treatment of the Cognitive Dimension/Domain in Major Depressive Disorder , 2015, CNS Drugs.

[10]  A. Lozano,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2005, Neuron.

[11]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation to Reward Circuitry Alleviates Anhedonia in Refractory Major Depression , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[12]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics , 2000 .

[13]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Chronic Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  Paul Krack,et al.  Deep brain stimulation: Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric issues , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[15]  S. Haque Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the East London and City Health Authority Ethic Committee. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. , 2011 .