Future gravitational physics tests from ranging to the BepiColombo Mercury planetary orbiter

Milani et al. recently have published careful and fundamental studies of the accuracy with which both gravitational physics information and the solar quadrupole moment can be obtained from Earth-Mercury distance data. To complement these results, a quite different analysis method is used in the present paper. We calculate the first-order corrections to the Keplerian motion of a single planet around the Sun due to the parameterized post-Newtonian theory parameters {beta}, {gamma}, {alpha}{sub 1}, {alpha}{sub 2}, and {xi}, as well as corrections due to the solar quadrupole moment J{sub 2} and a possible secular change in GM{sub {center_dot}}. The Nordtvedt parameter {eta} that is used in tests of the strong equivalence principle also is included in this analysis. The expected accuracies are given for 1 yr, 2 yr, and 8 yr mission durations, assuming that the planet-planet and asteroid-planet perturbations are accurately known. The ''modified worst-case'' error analysis method that we use is quite different from the usual covariance analysis method based on assumed uncorrelated random errors, plus a bias that is fixed or that changes in a prescribed way. We believe this is appropriate because systematic measurement errors are likely to be the main limitation on the accuracy of themore » results. Our final estimated uncertainties are one-third of the errors that would result if a 4.5-cm rms systematic error had the most damaging possible variation with time. We discuss the resulting uncertainties for several different subsets of orbital and relativity parameters.« less

[1]  James G. Williams,et al.  Williams et al. Reply (to the Comment by Dumin on"Progress in Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of Relativistic Gravity") , 2006, gr-qc/0612171.

[2]  Dah-Ning Yuan,et al.  A global solution for the Mars static and seasonal gravity, Mars orientation, Phobos and Deimos masses, and Mars ephemeris , 2006 .

[3]  T. W. Murphy,et al.  IMPROVING LLR TESTS OF GRAVITATIONAL THEORY , 2003, gr-qc/0311021.

[4]  P. Tortora,et al.  A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft , 2003, Nature.

[5]  D. Vokrouhlický,et al.  Testing general relativity with the BepiColombo radio science experiment , 2002 .

[6]  Luciano Iess,et al.  Advanced radio science instrumentation for the mission BepiColombo to Mercury , 2001 .

[7]  D. Vokrouhlický,et al.  Gravity field and rotation state of Mercury from the BepiColombo Radio Science Experiments , 2001 .

[8]  J. Anderson,et al.  The Solar Test of the Equivalence Principle , 1995, gr-qc/9510029.

[9]  P. Bender,et al.  Probing the interior structure of Mercury from an orbiter plus single lander , 1995 .

[10]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  An Investigation into the Existence of Saturnian Trojan Asteroids , 1993 .

[11]  J. Anderson,et al.  Experimental test of the variability ofG using Viking lander ranging data , 1989 .

[12]  T. Brown,et al.  Inferring the sun's internal angular velocity from observed p-mode frequency splittings , 1989 .

[13]  K. Nordtvedt.  Probing gravity to the second post-Newtonian order and to one part in 10 to the 7th using the spin axis of the sun , 1987 .

[14]  C. Will.  The confrontation between general relativity and experiment: An update☆ , 1984 .

[15]  J. Harvey,et al.  Internal rotation of the Sun , 1984, Nature.

[16]  R. Reasenberg,et al.  The constancy of G and other gravitational experiments , 1983, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  R. Decher,et al.  Test of relativistic gravitation with a space-borne hydrogen maser , 1980 .

[18]  V. Canuto,et al.  Case for an open universe , 1980 .

[19]  Irwin I. Shapiro,et al.  Viking relativity experiment - Verification of signal retardation by solar gravity , 1979 .

[20]  M. W. Levine,et al.  A test of the equivalence principle using a space-borne clock , 1979 .

[21]  J. G. Williams,et al.  New Test of the Equivalence Principle from Lunar Laser Ranging , 1976 .

[22]  Charles C. Counselman,et al.  Verification of the principle of equivalence for massive bodies. [from lunar retroreflector echo delay data] , 1976 .

[23]  C. Will.  Relativistic gravity in the solar system. III. Experimental disproof of a class of linear theories of gravitation , 1973 .

[24]  P. M. Fitzpatrick.  Principles of Celestial Mechanics , 1971 .

[25]  Kenneth Nordtvedt,et al.  Testing relativity with laser ranging to the moon , 1968 .

[26]  Kenneth Nordtvedt,et al.  EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR MASSIVE BODIES. II. THEORY. , 1968 .

[27]  K. Nordtvedt.  Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. I. Phenomenology , 1968 .

[28]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[29]  I. Shapiro.  Fourth Test of General Relativity , 1964 .

[30]  R. Dicke,et al.  Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation , 1961 .

[31]  P. Dirac.  The Cosmological Constants , 1937, Nature.

[32]  A. Coates,et al.  Determination of comet Halley Gas emission characteristics from mass loading of the solar wind , 1990 .

[33]  James G. Williams,et al.  Determining asteroid masses from perturbations on Mars , 1984 .

[34]  Clifford M. Will,et al.  Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic Gravity. I. Preferred-Frame Theories and an Extended PPN Formalism , 1972 .

[35]  C. Will,et al.  Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic Gravity. II. Experimental Evidence to Rule Out Preferred-Frame Theories of Gravity , 1972 .

[36]  F. Hoyle,et al.  Cosmological Models in a Conformally Invariant Gravitational Theory—II: A New Model , 1972 .