The Effect of Feed-in Tariffs on Renewable Electricity Generation: An Instrumental Variables Approach

While carbon taxes and other market-based instruments are widely regarded as optimal for climate mitigation, political constraints have prevented governments from using them. Instead, narrower instruments, including the feed-in tariff (FIT) for renewable electricity generation, have become popular. However, their causal effect on renewable electricity generation remains subject to uncertainty. We use instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of FITs on renewable electricity generation in 26 industrialized countries, 1979–2005. We find that increasing the FIT by one U.S. cent (2000 constant prices) per kilowatt hour increases the percentage change in renewable electricity’s share of the total by 0.11 % points. All else constant, if a country implemented for a decade the sample mean FIT of three U.S. cents, the national share of renewable electricity would increase by 3.3 % points, which is more than the sample mean. In addition to demonstrating that the FIT is an effective way to increase renewable electricity generation, our approach lays the foundation for future studies of the causal effects of renewable energy policies.

[1]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading , 1998 .

[2]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model , 2007 .

[3]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[4]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Oil prices and energy technology innovation: An empirical analysis , 2012 .

[5]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Learning or Lock-In: Optimal Technology Policies to Support Mitigation , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[7]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[8]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[9]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[10]  Paul J. Burke Income, resources, and electricity mix , 2010 .

[11]  R. Cook Detection of influential observation in linear regression , 2000 .

[12]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[13]  Miguel Mendonça,et al.  Feed-in Tariffs: Accelerating the Deployment of Renewable Energy , 2012 .

[14]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Why has public R&D on alternatives to fossil fuels decreased in industrialized countries? , 2013 .

[15]  R. Frisch,et al.  Partial Time Regressions as Compared with Individual Trends , 1933 .

[16]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[17]  M. Lovell A Simple Proof of the FWL Theorem , 2008 .

[18]  Y. Gagnon,et al.  An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[20]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies , 2007 .