Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink.

Observers often miss the 2nd of 2 visual targets (first target [T1] and second target [T2]) when these targets are presented closely in time; the attentional blink (AB). The authors hypothesized that the AB occurs because the attentional response to T2 is delayed by T1 processing, causing T2 to lose a competition for attention to the item that follows it. The authors investigated this hypothesis by determining whether the AB is attenuated when T2 is precued. The results from 4 experiments showed that the duration and magnitude of the AB were substantially reduced when T2 was precued. The observed improvement in T2 report did not occur at the expense of T1 report, suggesting that processing of T1 was already completed or was at least protected when the cue was presented. The authors conclude that, during the AB, there is a delay between detection and the selection of target candidates for consolidation in short-term memory.

[1]  M. Chun,et al.  The Neural Fate of Consciously Perceived and Missed Events in the Attentional Blink , 2004, Neuron.

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  The Attentional Blink is Immune to Masking-Induced Data Limits , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology , 2006, Psychological research.

[4]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory. , 1986, Psychological review.

[5]  M. Chun,et al.  The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[8]  K L Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Four-dot masking produces the attentional blink , 2003, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Klein,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Reflexive Attention Shifts: A Dual-Stream Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Exploration , 2002, Psychological science.

[11]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Gore,et al.  Neural Correlates of the Attentional Blink , 2000, Neuron.

[13]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[14]  M. T. Reinitz,et al.  Separate and Combined Effects of Location Cuing and Repetition Priming on Perceptual Encoding of Words , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  E. Vogel,et al.  Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  M. Chun,et al.  The dark side of visual attention , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[23]  J. Wolfe Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon , 2006, Psychological research.

[25]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[26]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Selective influence of second target exposure duration and Task1 load effects in the attentional blink phenomenon , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? , 2005, Psychological research.

[28]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[31]  A. Anderson,et al.  Effects of phonological length on the attentional blink for words. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[34]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[35]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The Beneficial Effect of Concurrent Task-Irrelevant Mental Activity on Temporal Attention , 2005, Psychological science.

[36]  M. Chun Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  D. Loach,et al.  Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism? , 2003 .

[38]  Mary C. Poti ' Er Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993 .

[39]  Lamme Vaf,et al.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003 .

[40]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[42]  M. Suero,et al.  A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  The Role of Iconic Memory in Change-Detection Tasks , 2000, Perception.

[44]  M. Potter,et al.  The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  G. Woodman,et al.  Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory , 2002 .

[46]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  S. Shih Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  G. Woodman,et al.  Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.

[49]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Kimron L. Shapiro,et al.  Object file continuity predicts attentional blink magnitude , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[52]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  H. Egeth,et al.  Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[56]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[57]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  E. Goldstein Blackwell handbook of perception , 2001 .

[59]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  New Objects, Not New Features, Trigger the Attentional Blink , 2003, Psychological science.