Ecological values of Hamilton urban streams (North Island, New Zealand): constraints and opportunities for restoration

Urban streams globally are characterised by degraded habitat conditions and low aquatic biodiversity, but are increasingly becoming the focus of restoration activities. We investigated habitat quality, ecological function, and fish and macroinvertebrate community composition of gully streams in Hamilton City, New Zealand, and compared these with a selection of periurban sites surrounded by rural land. A similar complement of fish species was found at urban and periurban sites, including two threatened species, with only one introduced fish widespread (Gambusia affinis). Stream macroinvertebrate community metrics indicated low ecological condition at most urban and periurban sites, but highlighted the presence of one high value urban site with a fauna dominated by sensitive taxa. Light-trapping around seepages in city gullies revealed the presence of several caddisfly species normally associated with native forest, suggesting that seepage habitats can provide important refugia for some aquatic insects in urban environments. Qualitative measures of stream habitat were not significantly different between urban and periurban sites, but urban streams had significantly lower hydraulic function and higher biogeochemical function than periurban streams. These functional differences are thought to reflect, respectively, (1) the combined effects of channel modification and stormwater hydrology, and (2) the influence of riparian vegetation providing shade and enhancing habitat in streams. Significant relationships between some macroinvertebrate community metrics and riparian vegetation buffering and bank protection suggest that riparian enhancement may have beneficial ecological outcomes in some urban streams. Other actions that may contribute to urban stream restoration goals include an integrated catchment approach to resolving fish passage issues, active reintroduction of wood to streams to enhance cover and habitat heterogeneity, and seeding of depauperate streams with native migratory fish to help initiate natural recolonisation.

[1]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[2]  V. Resh.  Stream crossings and the conservation of diadromous invertebrates in South Pacific island streams , 2005 .

[3]  J. Harding,et al.  Longitudinal patterns in benthic communities in an urban stream under restoration , 2005 .

[4]  Stephen Moore,et al.  A Rapid Method to Score Stream Reaches Based on the Overall Performance of Their Main Ecological Functions , 2009, Environmental management.

[5]  K. Collier,et al.  Macroinvertebrate-wood associations during decay of plantation pine in New Zealand pumice-bed streams: stable habitat or trophic subsidy? , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  A. Neboiss.  Atlas of Trichoptera of the SW Pacific — Australian Region , 1986, Series Entomologica.

[7]  N. Ling.  Gambusia in New Zealand: Really bad or just misunderstood? , 2004 .

[8]  D. Rowe,et al.  Use of in‐stream cover types by adult banded kokopu (Galaxias fasciatus) in first‐order North Island, New Zealand, streams , 2003 .

[9]  Marc Gerhard,et al.  Restoration of Streams with Large Wood: Effects of Accumulated and Built-in Wood on Channel Morphology, Habitat Diversity and Aquatic Fauna , 2000 .

[10]  B. A. Aldridge.  Restoring giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus) populations in Hamilton's urban streams , 2008 .

[11]  C. Baker,et al.  Attraction of migratory inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and koaro (Galaxias brevipinnis) juveniles to adult galaxiid odours , 2003 .

[12]  Brian J. Smith.  Two new species of caddisflies (Trichoptera) from New Zealand , 2008 .

[13]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[14]  S. Roberts,et al.  Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management , 2004 .

[15]  J. Quinn,et al.  Forecasting rehabilitation outcomes for degraded New Zealand pastoral streams. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  W. Streams.  Regional Guidelines for Ecological Assessments of Freshwater Environments , 2005 .

[17]  R. Rowe.  The Dragonflies of New Zealand , 1988 .

[18]  C. J. Walsh.  Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design? , 2004 .

[19]  M. Freeman,et al.  Importance of Riparian Forests in Urban Catchments Contingent on Sediment and Hydrologic Regimes , 2006, Environmental management.

[20]  J. Richardson,et al.  Comparison of habitat use by fish in normal and flooded river conditions , 1994 .

[21]  M. Palmer,et al.  Restoring streams in an urbanizing world , 2007 .

[22]  A. Suren,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of enhancement activities in urban streams: II. Responses of invertebrate communities , 2005 .

[23]  R. Hitchmough,et al.  New Zealand Threat Classification System lists: 2005. , 2007 .

[24]  B. Hicks,et al.  Growth and population dynamics of crayfish Paranephrops planifrons in streams within native forest and pastoral land uses , 2002 .

[25]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  Guide to the aquatic insects of New Zealand. 3rd edition. , 1981 .

[26]  B. Hicks.  Food webs in forest and pasture streams in the Waikato region, New Zealand: A study based on analyses of stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen, and fish gut contents , 1997 .

[27]  G. Hall,et al.  Managing Plantation Forests to Provide Short- to Long-Term Supplies of Wood to Streams: A Simulation Study Using New Zealand’s Pine Plantations , 2005, Environmental management.

[28]  R. Davies‐Colley,et al.  Stream channels are narrower in pasture than in forest , 1997 .

[29]  Michael J. Winterbourn,et al.  How well do New Zealand's stream‐monitoring indicators, the macroinvertebrate community index and its quantitative variant, correspond? , 2003 .

[30]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[31]  C. Baker,et al.  Habitat use by banded kokopu (Galaxias fasciatus) and giant kokopu (G. argenteus) co‐occurring in streams draining the Hakarimata Range, New Zealand , 2007 .

[32]  J. Quinn,et al.  LAND USE EFFECTS ON HABITAT, WATER QUALITY, PERIPHYTON, AND BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES IN WAIKATO, NEW ZEALAND, HILL-COUNTRY STREAMS , 1997 .

[33]  S. Sheldon,et al.  Response of macroinvertebrates to blooms of iron-depositing bacteria , 1990, Hydrobiologia.

[34]  C. Andrew Dolloff,et al.  Design Considerations for Large Woody Debris Placement in Stream Enhancement Projects , 1998 .

[35]  J. Meyer,et al.  Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  J. Harding,et al.  Barriers to the recovery of aquatic insect communities in urban streams , 2006 .

[37]  A. Chin.  Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context , 2006 .