Variation of biomass and kinetic parameters for nitrifying species in the TNCU3 process at different aerobic hydraulic retention times

In this study, the variation of biomass, kinetic parameters, and stoichiometric parameters for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in TNCU3 process were explored at different aerobic hydraulic retention time (AHRT). The results indicated that the growth rate constants of AOB were 0.92, 0.88, and 0.95 days−1, respectively, meanwhile, those of NOB were 2.58 1.41, and 1.40 days−1, respectively, when AHRT was 5, 6, and 7 h. The lysis rate constants for AOB and NOB were 0.13 and 0.17 days−1, respectively. When AHRT was 5, 6, and 7 h, the yield coefficients of AOB were 0.20, 0.23, and 0.28 g COD g−1 N, respectively, meanwhile those of NOB were 0.23, 0.19, and 0.22 g COD g−1 N, respectively. The average percentage of AOB was 0.44, 0.61, and 0.64%, respectively, while that of NOB was 0.46, 0.61, and 0.74%, respectively. The relation between the biomass percentage of AOB and AHRT was in a good agreement with first type hyperbolic curve. The relation between the biomass percentage of NOB and AHRT was in a good agreement with seven types of curve including simple exponential curve, power exponential curve, and first type hyperbolic curve etc. When the AHRT increased from 5 to 7 h, the removal efficiency of NH4+–N increased from 80.2 to 94.8%, or by 14.6%. Meanwhile, the removal efficiency of total nitrogen increased from 63.6 to 70.9%, or by 7.3%.

[1]  Jürg Kappeler,et al.  Low F/M bulking and scumming: Towards a better understanding by modelling , 1995 .

[2]  T. Pai,et al.  Effect of Cd(II) on different bacterial species present in a single sludge activated sludge process for carbon and nutrient removal , 2006 .

[3]  R. Chiou,et al.  Novel modeling concept for evaluating the effects of cadmium and copper on heterotrophic growth and lysis rates in activated sludge process. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Tzu-Yi Pai,et al.  Modeling a Combined Anaerobic/Anoxic Oxide and Rotating Biological Contactors Process under Dissolved Oxygen Variation by Using an Activated Sludge-Biofilm Hybrid Model , 2004 .

[5]  B. Erol Nalbur,et al.  Influence of the activated sludge system configuration on heavy metal toxicity reduction , 2008 .

[6]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modeling , 1992 .

[7]  Tzu-Yi Pai,et al.  Modelling the steady-state effluent characteristics of the TNCU process under different return mixed liquid , 2001 .

[8]  Tzu-Yi Pai,et al.  Using an extended activated sludge model to simulate nitrite and nitrate variations in TNCU2 process , 2009 .

[9]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[10]  F. Bux,et al.  ‘Morphological shifts’ in filamentous bacteria isolated from activated sludge processes , 2006 .

[11]  Tzu-Yi Pai,et al.  Two types of organophosphate pesticides and their combined effects on heterotrophic growth rates in activated sludge process , 2009 .

[12]  K. Sei,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for Routine Enumeration of Specific Bacterial DNA in Aquatic Samples , 2005 .

[13]  H. Chang,et al.  Microbial kinetic analysis of three different types of EBNR process. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[14]  G. Insel,et al.  Model-based process analysis of partial nitrification efficiency under dynamic nitrogen loading , 2009, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[15]  Slil Siripong,et al.  Diversity study of nitrifying bacteria in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. , 2007, Water research.

[16]  Karl Svardal,et al.  The dynamic behaviour of nitrifying activated sludge systems influenced by inhibiting wastewater compounds , 1995 .

[17]  B. Tartakovsky,et al.  Coupled nitrification-denitrification processes in a mixed culture of coimmobilized cells: Analysis and experiment , 1996 .

[18]  Johannes Tramper,et al.  Dynamic modeling of immobilized Nitrosomonas europaea: implementation of diffusion limitation over expanding microcolonies. , 1995 .

[19]  Laurent Poughon,et al.  Dynamics and steady state operation of a nitrifying fixed bed biofilm reactor: mathematical model based description , 2005 .

[20]  Yongzhen Peng,et al.  Short-cut nitrification of domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale A/O nitrogen removal plant , 2007, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[21]  S. Doğruel,et al.  An investigation on the optimal location of ozonation within biological treatment for a tannery wastewater , 2006 .

[22]  A. Aivasidis,et al.  A modified UCT method for biological nutrient removal: configuration and performance. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[23]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Modelling and optimisation of a chemical industry wastewater treatment plant subjected to varying production schedules , 2004 .

[24]  G. Daigger,et al.  Enhancing nitrification in North American activated sludge plants , 2000 .

[25]  Ruihong Zhang,et al.  Aerobic treatment of dairy wastewater with sequencing batch reactor systems , 2002, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[26]  G. Dalhammar,et al.  Enhancing biological nitrogen removal from tannery effluent by using the efficient Brachymonas denitrificans in pilot plant operations , 2005 .

[27]  Tzu-Yi Pai,et al.  Modeling nitrite and nitrate variations in A2O process under different return oxic mixed liquid using an extended model , 2007 .