Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?

Many scholars in the instructional systems field have addressed the paradigm shift in the field of learning psychology and its implications for instructional systems technology (IST). This article analyzes the philosophical assumptions underlying IST and its behavioral and cognitive foundations, each of which is primarily objectivistic, which means that knowing and learning are processes for representing and mirroring reality. The philosophical assumptions of objectivism are then contrasted with constructivism, which holds that knowing is a process of actively interpreting and constructing individual knowledge representations. The implications of constructivism for IST provide a context for asking the reader to consider to what extent our field should consider this philosophical paradigm shift.

[1]  W. L. Sumner.  The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution , 1959, Nature.

[2]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[3]  William Winn,et al.  An Open-System Model of Learning. , 1974 .

[4]  William Winn,et al.  The 1974 AVCR young scholar paper , 1975 .

[5]  G. Salomon.  Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[6]  Leonard Peikoff,et al.  Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology , 1979 .

[7]  William F. O'Neill.  Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology , 1980 .

[8]  Jerry A. Fodor,et al.  Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science , 1981 .

[9]  John K. Burton,et al.  Integrating learning theory with instructional design , 1981 .

[10]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Cognitive research and the design of science instruction , 1982 .

[11]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[12]  Paul M. Churchland,et al.  Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind , 1984 .

[13]  Marsha Hanen,et al.  Of Mind and Other Matters , 1985 .

[14]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[15]  H. Gardner.  The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[16]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning Strategies: A New Educational Technology , 1985 .

[17]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[18]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Characteristics of cognitive engineering: The next generation of instructional systems , 1987 .

[19]  L. Resnick.  The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[20]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Cognitive flexibility theory : advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains , 1988 .

[21]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology , 1988 .

[22]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[23]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[24]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[25]  William Winn,et al.  Some implications of cognitive theory for instructional design , 1990 .

[26]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[27]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[28]  Educational technology columnists , 1991 .