An interlaboratory study of TEX86 and BIT analysis of sediments, extracts, and standard mixtures

Two commonly used proxies based on the distribution of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) are the TEX86 (TetraEther indeX of 86 carbon atoms) paleothermometer for sea surface temperature reconstructions and the BIT (Branched Isoprenoid Tetraether) index for reconstructing soil organic matter input to the ocean. An initial round‐robin study of two sediment extracts, in which 15 laboratories participated, showed relatively consistent TEX86 values (reproducibility ±3–4°C when translated to temperature) but a large spread in BIT measurements (reproducibility ±0.41 on a scale of 0–1). Here we report results of a second round‐robin study with 35 laboratories in which three sediments, one sediment extract, and two mixtures of pure, isolated GDGTs were analyzed. The results for TEX86 and BIT index showed improvement compared to the previous round‐robin study. The reproducibility, indicating interlaboratory variation, of TEX86 values ranged from 1.3 to 3.0°C when translated to temperature. These results are similar to those of other temperature proxies used in paleoceanography. Comparison of the results obtained from one of the three sediments showed that TEX86 and BIT indices are not significantly affected by interlaboratory differences in sediment extraction techniques. BIT values of the sediments and extracts were at the extremes of the index with values close to 0 or 1, and showed good reproducibility (ranging from 0.013 to 0.042). However, the measured BIT values for the two GDGT mixtures, with known molar ratios of crenarchaeol and branched GDGTs, had intermediate BIT values and showed poor reproducibility and a large overestimation of the “true” (i.e., molar‐based) BIT index. The latter is likely due to, among other factors, the higher mass spectrometric response of branched GDGTs compared to crenarchaeol, which also varies among mass spectrometers. Correction for this different mass spectrometric response showed a considerable improvement in the reproducibility of BIT index measurements among laboratories, as well as a substantially improved estimation of molar‐based BIT values. This suggests that standard mixtures should be used in order to obtain consistent, and molar‐based, BIT values.

[1]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Comparison of extraction and work up techniques for analysis of core and intact polar tetraether lipids from sedimentary environments , 2012 .

[2]  T. Bianchi,et al.  A re-evaluation of the use of branched GDGTs as terrestrial biomarkers: Implications for the BIT Index , 2012 .

[3]  A. Rosell‐Melé,et al.  Constraints in the application of the Branched and Isoprenoid Tetraether index as a terrestrial input proxy , 2011 .

[4]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  New indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature reconstructions , 2010 .

[5]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Applicability and calibration of the TEX86 paleothermometer in lakes. , 2010 .

[6]  C. Savage,et al.  Comparison of lignin phenols and branched/isoprenoid tetraethers (BIT index) as indices of terrestrial organic matter in Doubtful Sound, Fiordland, New Zealand , 2010 .

[7]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Contribution of river‐borne soil organic carbon to the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean) , 2010 .

[8]  H. Harvey,et al.  The sequestration of terrestrial organic carbon in Arctic Ocean sediments: A comparison of methods and implications for regional carbon budgets , 2009 .

[9]  A. Rosell‐Melé,et al.  Analytical considerations for the use of the paleothermometer tetraether index(86) and the branched vs isoprenoid tetraether index regarding the choice of cleanup and instrumental conditions. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  A. Nederbragt,et al.  An interlaboratory study of TEX86 and BIT analysis using high‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , 2009 .

[11]  P. deMenocal,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison study of calibration standards for foraminiferal Mg/Ca thermometry , 2008 .

[12]  R. Keil,et al.  Sources and transport of terrestrial organic matter in Vancouver Island fjords and the Vancouver‐Washington Margin: A multiproxy approach using d13Corg, lignin phenols, and the ether lipid BIT index , 2008 .

[13]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Global sediment core-top calibration of the TEX86 paleothermometer in the ocean , 2008 .

[14]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Twentieth century proxy records of temperature and soil organic matter input in the Drammensfjord, southern Norway , 2007 .

[15]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Analytical methodology for TEX86 paleothermometry by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  O. Spaargaren,et al.  Occurrence and distribution of tetraether membrane lipids in soils : Implications for the use of the TEX86 proxy and the BIT index , 2006 .

[17]  F. Bourrin,et al.  Origin and distribution of terrestrial organic matter in the NW Mediterranean (Gulf of Lions): Exploring the newly developed BIT index , 2006 .

[18]  D. Thompson,et al.  An improved method to determine the absolute abundance of glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether lipids , 2006 .

[19]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Characterization of transport and deposition of terrestrial organic matter in the southern North Sea using the BIT index , 2006 .

[20]  L. Aluwihare,et al.  Quantifying archaeal community autotrophy in the mesopelagic ocean using natural radiocarbon. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Michael Thompson,et al.  The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2006 .

[22]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  A novel proxy for terrestrial organic matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids , 2004 .

[23]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Crenarchaeotal membrane lipids in lake sediments : a new paleotemperature proxy for continental paleoclimate reconstruction? , 2004 .

[24]  P. deMenocal,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison study of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca measurements in planktonic foraminifera for paleoceanographic research , 2004 .

[25]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: a new tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures? , 2002 .

[26]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Rapid isolation of biomarkers for compound specific radiocarbon dating using high-performance liquid chromatography and flow injection analysis-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  C. Pelejero,et al.  Precision of the current methods to measure the alkenone proxy U37K′ and absolute alkenone abundance in sediments: Results of an interlaboratory comparison study , 2001 .

[28]  H. Elderfield,et al.  Past temperature and δ18O of surface ocean waters inferred from foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios , 2000, Nature.

[29]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Analysis of intact tetraether lipids in archaeal cell material and sediments by high performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[30]  T. Nilsson,et al.  Inter-Laboratory Studies for the Validation of Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Aqueous Samples. , 1997 .

[31]  C. Hemleben,et al.  Assessing the reliability of magnesium in foraminiferal calcite as a proxy for water mass temperatures , 1996 .

[32]  F. Prahl,et al.  Calibration of unsaturation patterns in long-chain ketone compositions for palaeotemperature assessment , 1987, Nature.

[33]  G. Eglinton,et al.  Molecular stratigraphy: a new tool for climatic assessment , 1986, Nature.

[34]  W. J. Dyer,et al.  A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. , 1959, Canadian journal of biochemistry and physiology.

[35]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[36]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  The organic geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: A review , 2013 .

[37]  R. Schneider,et al.  Disentangling marine, soil and plant organic carbon contributions to continental margin sediments: A multi-proxy approach in a 20,000 year sediment record from the Congo deep-sea fan , 2009 .

[38]  A. Rosell‐Melé,et al.  Rapid screening of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in continental Eurasia samples using HPLC/APCI-ion trap mass spectrometry , 2007 .