From pre-emption to slowness: Assessing the contrasting temporalities of data-driven predictive policing

Debates on the temporal shift associated with digitalization often stress notions of speed and acceleration. With the advent of big data and predictive analytics, the time-compressing features of digitalization are compounded within a distinct operative logic: that of pre-emption. The temporality of pre-emption attempts to project the past into a simulated future that can be acted upon in the present; a temporality of pure imminence. Yet, inherently paradoxical, pre-emption is marked by myriads of contrasts and frictions as it is caught between the supposedly all-encompassing knowledge of the data-processing ‘Machine’, and the daily reality of decision-making practices by relevant social actors. In this article, we explore the contrasting temporalities of automated data processing and predictive analytics, using policing as an illustrative example. Drawing on insights from two cases of predictive policing systems that have been implemented among UK police forces, we highlight the prevalence of counter-temporalities as predictive analytics is situated in institutional contexts and consider the conditions of possibility for agency and deliberation. Analysing these temporal tensions in relation to ‘slowness’ as a mode of resistance, the contextual examination of predictive policing advanced in the article provides a contribution to the formation of a deeper awareness of the politics of time in automated data processing; one that may serve to counter the imperative of pre-emption that, taken to the limit, seeks to foreclose the time for politics, action and life.

[1]  C. Honoré.  In Praise of Slowness: Challenging the Cult of Speed , 2015 .

[2]  Franco Bifo Berardi.  And: Phenomenology of the End , 2015 .

[3]  R. Hassan.  Empires of Speed: Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society , 2009 .

[4]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[5]  Cameron Tonkinwise,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism , 2014 .

[6]  Angèle Christin.  Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice , 2017 .

[7]  Lina Dencik,et al.  Managing 'Threats': Uses of Social Media for Policing Domestic Extremism and Disorder in the UK , 2015 .

[8]  Hartmut Rosa,et al.  Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity , 2013 .

[9]  Anne Kaun.  Regimes of time: Media practices of the dispossessed , 2015 .

[10]  M. C. Elish,et al.  Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction , 2019, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society.

[11]  Judy Wajcman,et al.  Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism , 2014 .

[12]  Veronica Barassi.  Social Media, Immediacy and the Time for Democracy: Critical Reflections on Social Media as ‘Temporalising Practices , 2015 .

[13]  Lina Dencik,et al.  Situating practices in datafication – from above and below , 2019, Citizen Media and Practice.

[14]  G. Zilboorg,et al.  Beyond the Pleasure Principle , 2015 .

[15]  Sarah Sharma,et al.  In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics , 2014 .

[16]  J. Wajcman.  Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[17]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Lina Dencik,et al.  Data scores as Governance: Investigating uses of citizen scoring in public services project report , 2018 .

[19]  Arne Hintz,et al.  Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: Social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom , 2018, New Media Soc..

[20]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Timewatch: social analysis of time , 1995 .

[21]  Bertrand Kiefer,et al.  [Simulacra and Simulation]. , 2013, Revue medicale suisse.

[22]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[23]  Anne Kaun.  Crisis and Critique: A History of Media Participation in Times of Crisis , 2016 .

[24]  Thomas Hylland Eriksen,et al.  Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age , 2001 .

[25]  Anne Kaun.  Pre-publication author version Time of Protest: An Archaeological Perspective on Media Practices , 2019 .

[26]  Sophia Melanson,et al.  We are data: algorithms and the making of our digital selves , 2017 .

[27]  Anne Kaun.  Time of protest , 2019, Citizen Media and Practice.

[28]  R. Hassan.  There Isn’t an App for That: Analogue and Digital Politics in the Age of Platform Capitalism , 2018 .

[29]  Paul Virilio,et al.  The art of the motor , 1995 .

[30]  John Tomlinson,et al.  The Culture of Speed: The Coming of Immediacy , 2007 .

[31]  Margaret M. Mullan.  Slow Media: Why Slow Is Satisfying, Sustainable, and Smart, Jennifer Rauch (2018) , 2020 .

[32]  Christian Pentzold,et al.  Between moments and millennia: temporalising mediatisation , 2018 .

[33]  K. Petrick.  Fast Times in Hallowed Halls: Making Time for Activism in a Culture of Speed , 2015 .

[34]  Louise Amoore,et al.  The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security Beyond Probability , 2013 .

[35]  L. Clever.  In the meantime. , 1994, The Western journal of medicine.

[36]  H. Rosa.  Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High–Speed Society , 2003 .

[37]  Fieke Jansen.  Data Driven Policing in the Context of Europe , 2019 .

[38]  John Cheney-Lippold.  John Cheney-Lippold, We Are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves , 2018 .

[39]  Samuel Greengard,et al.  Policing the future , 2012, Commun. ACM.