Corneal Endothelial Cell Segmentation by Classifier-Driven Merging of Oversegmented Images

Corneal endothelium images obtained by in vivo specular microscopy provide important information to assess the health status of the cornea. Estimation of clinical parameters, such as cell density, polymegethism, and pleomorphism, requires accurate cell segmentation. State-of-the-art techniques to automatically segment the endothelium are error-prone when applied to images with low contrast and/or large variation in cell size. Here, we propose an automatic method to segment the endothelium. Starting with an oversegmented image comprised of superpixels obtained from a stochastic watershed segmentation, the proposed method uses intensity and shape information of the superpixels to identify and merge those that constitute a cell, using support vector machines. We evaluated the automatic segmentation on a data set of in vivo specular microscopy images (Topcon SP-1P), obtaining 95.8% correctly merged cells and 2.0% undersegmented cells. We also evaluated the parameter estimation against the results of the vendor’s built-in software, obtaining a statistically significant better precision in all parameters and a similar or better accuracy. The parameter estimation was also evaluated on three other data sets from different imaging modalities (confocal microscopy, phase-contrast microscopy, and fluorescence confocal microscopy) and tissue types (ex vivo corneal endothelium and retinal pigment epithelium). In comparison with the estimates of the data sets’ authors, we achieved statistically significant better accuracy and precision in all parameters except pleomorphism, where a similar accuracy and precision were obtained.

[1]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .

[2]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Comparison of Manual and Automated Endothelial Cell Density Analysis in Normal Eyes and DSEK Eyes , 2013, Cornea.

[3]  Avet.,et al.  VISUAL PERCEPTION BASED AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF CELL MOSAICS IN HUMAN CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUM MICROSCOPY IMAGES , 2008 .

[4]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count Using Confocal and Contact Specular Microscopy , 2003, Ophthalmologica.

[5]  Cris L. Luengo Hendriks,et al.  Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy , 2015, BMC Medical Imaging.

[6]  S. Jonuscheit,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation , 2011, Eye.

[7]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Automatic segmentation of closed-contour features in ophthalmic images using graph theory and dynamic programming , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[8]  S. Jacob Endothelium , 2002, Surgical Anatomy for Endothelial Keratoplasty.

[9]  K R Kenyon,et al.  The Corneal Endothelium , 1982 .

[10]  J. McLaren,et al.  Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Images From a Noncontact Specular Microscope and a Scanning Confocal Microscope , 2005, Cornea.

[11]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[12]  Alfredo Ruggeri,et al.  Development of a Reliable Automated Algorithm for the Morphometric Analysis of Human Corneal Endothelium , 2016, Cornea.

[13]  Christoph Hirneiss,et al.  Endothelial Cell Density in Donor Corneas: A Comparison of Automatic Software Programs With Manual Counting , 2007, Cornea.

[14]  Li Li,et al.  Edge-based split-and-merge superpixel segmentation , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[15]  M. Coroneo,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Song Zhu,et al.  Improved accuracy of superpixel segmentation by region merging method , 2016 .

[17]  Srinivas R. Sadda,et al.  Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium , 2017, Eye & contact lens.

[18]  A. Ruggeri,et al.  A system for the automatic estimation of morphometric parameters of corneal endothelium in alizarine red-stained images , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[19]  Andrew D Dick,et al.  Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[21]  R. Qahwaji,et al.  An efficient intelligent analysis system for confocal corneal endothelium images , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[22]  Teruo Nishida,et al.  Comparison of Confocal Biomicroscopy and Noncontact Specular Microscopy for Evaluation of the Corneal Endothelium , 2003, Cornea.

[23]  P. A. Mohammad-Salih,et al.  Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Malay eyes. , 2011, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[24]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Anti-amyloid therapy protects against retinal pigmented epithelium damage and vision loss in a model of age-related macular degeneration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Jian-Jiun Ding,et al.  Efficient image segmentation algorithm using SLIC superpixels and boundary-focused region merging , 2013, 2013 9th International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing.

[26]  Bin Yan,et al.  Interactive image segmentation based on hierarchical superpixels initialization and region merging , 2014, 2014 7th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[27]  Paolo Brusini,et al.  Comparison Between Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and Noncontact Specular Microscopy in Assessing Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Central Corneal Thickness , 2011, Cornea.

[28]  W M Bourne,et al.  Biology of the corneal endothelium in health and disease , 2003, Eye.