Next-generation phenomics for the Tree of Life

The phenotype represents a critical interface between the genome and the environment in which organisms live and evolve. Phenotypic characters also are a rich source of biodiversity data for tree building, and they enable scientists to reconstruct the evolutionary history of organisms, including most fossil taxa, for which genetic data are unavailable. Therefore, phenotypic data are necessary for building a comprehensive Tree of Life. In contrast to recent advances in molecular sequencing, which has become faster and cheaper through recent technological advances, phenotypic data collection remains often prohibitively slow and expensive. The next-generation phenomics project is a collaborative, multidisciplinary effort to leverage advances in image analysis, crowdsourcing, and natural language processing to develop and implement novel approaches for discovering and scoring the phenome, the collection of phentotypic characters for a species. This research represents a new approach to data collection that has the potential to transform phylogenetics research and to enable rapid advances in constructing the Tree of Life. Our goal is to assemble large phenomic datasets built using new methods and to provide the public and scientific community with tools for phenomic data assembly that will enable rapid and automated study of phenotypes across the Tree of Life.

[1]  Andrea L. Cirranello,et al.  The Placental Mammal Ancestor and the Post–K-Pg Radiation of Placentals , 2013, Science.

[2]  J. Losos,et al.  Who Speaks with a Forked Tongue? , 2012, Science.

[3]  L. Harmon,et al.  INTEGRATING FOSSILS WITH MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES IMPROVES INFERENCE OF TRAIT EVOLUTION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Hong Cui CharaParser for fine-grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  J. Balhoff,et al.  Time to change how we describe biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Seth Kaufman,et al.  MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud” , 2011, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[7]  A. Berta,et al.  The Comparative Osteology of the Petrotympanic Complex (Ear Region) of Extant Baleen Whales (Cetacea: Mysticeti) , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Stacked spatial-pyramid kernel: An object-class recognition method to combine scores from random trees , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[9]  Charles R Marshall,et al.  Diversity dynamics: molecular phylogenies need the fossil record. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Automated processing and identification of benthic invertebrate samples , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  Daniel L Rabosky,et al.  EXTINCTION RATES SHOULD NOT BE ESTIMATED FROM MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Automated insect identification through concatenated histograms of local appearance features: feature vector generation and region detection for deformable objects , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV '07).

[14]  Jeremy A. Miller,et al.  Linking of digital images to phylogenetic data matrices using a morphological ontology. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[15]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Automated Insect Identification through Concatenated Histograms of Local Appearance Features , 2007, WACV.

[16]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Pattern Recognition for Ecological Science and Environmental Monitoring: An Initial Report , 2006 .

[17]  J. Wiens The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[18]  P. Lewis A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[19]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILS , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.