Open Debridement of Acute Gram-Positive Infections After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Open debridement and retention of components is an attractive, but often ineffective strategy for the treatment of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with acute infection. Few studies have stratified the outcomes of debridement specifically according to bacterial species. Thirty-one TKAs with acute gram-positive infections, seen at our institution during the past 10 years, were treated with open debridement, component retention, and antibiotics. The average duration of symptoms before debridement was 9 days (range, 1–40 days), and 78% of debridements were done within 10 days of the onset of symptoms. Eleven (35%) of the 31 patients successfully retained their components at most recent followup, without ongoing infection (mean, 4 years; range, 2–10 years). Only one (8%) of the 13 who had an infection with Staphylococcus aureus was treated successfully, compared with 10 (56%) of 18 patients who had infections, with either Staphylococcus epidermidis or a streptococcal species. The difference between these groups is statistically significant. The success rate of debridement of acute infections in TKA varies significantly depending on the involved pathogen. A high failure rate suggests that immediate component removal should be considered in the presence of acute Staphylococcus aureus infection in TKA. Debridement for acute streptococcal or Staphylococcus epidermidis species has better success, but likely should be done within 2 to 3 days from the onset of symptoms.

[1]  Claude Carbón,et al.  Prosthetic joint infection: when can prosthesis salvage be considered? , 1999, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with prosthesis removal and delayed reimplantation arthroplasty. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention. , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  J. Rand Alternatives to reimplantation for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  T. Fehring,et al.  Periprosthetic knee sepsis. The role of irrigation and debridement. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  C. Hopson,et al.  Implant Salvage in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  K. Knutson,et al.  The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  B. Morrey,et al.  Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by débridement with retention of the components. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  T S Thornhill,et al.  Infection as a complication of total knee-replacement arthroplasty. Risk factors and treatment in sixty-seven cases. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  L. Dorr,et al.  Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement versus two-stage reimplantation. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  B. Morrey,et al.  Long-term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.