Utilization of Image, LiDAR and Gamma-Ray Information to Improve Environmental Sustainability of Cut-to-Length Wood Harvesting Operations in Peatlands: A Management Systems Perspective

Forest industry corporations use quality management systems in their wood procurement operations. Spatial quality data are used to improve the quality of wood harvesting and to achieve environmental sustainability. Some studies have proposed new management systems based on LiDAR. The main aim of this study was to investigate how efficiently planning systems can select areas for wood harvesting a priori with respect to avoiding harvesting damage caused by forest machinery. A literature review revealed the possibility of using GISs, and case studies showed the criteria required to predict the required quality levels. Terrestrial LiDAR can be utilized in authorities’ quality control systems, but it is inefficient for preplanning without terrestrial gamma-ray data collection. Airborne LiDAR and gamma-ray information about forest soils can only be used for planning larger regions at the forest level because the information includes too much uncertainty to allow it to be used for planning in small-sized areas before wood harvesting operations involving wood procurement. In addition, airborne LiDAR is not accurate enough, even at the forest level, for the planning of wood procurement systems because wood harvesting remains challenging without field measurements. Therefore, there is a need for the use of manual ground-penetrating radar for determining the peat layer thickness and the depth to the groundwater table.

[1]  M. Saarilahti,et al.  Terrain Trafficability Prediction with GIS Analysis , 2009 .

[2]  L. Pari,et al.  Applications of GIS-Based Software to Improve the Sustainability of a Forwarding Operation in Central Italy , 2020, Sustainability.

[3]  D. Carless,et al.  Mapping upland peat depth using airborne radiometric and lidar survey data , 2019, Geoderma.

[4]  T. Palander,et al.  Excavator technology for increasing the efficiency of energy wood and pulp wood harvesting , 2012 .

[5]  L. Slater,et al.  Imaging tropical peatlands in Indonesia using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity imaging (ERI): implications for carbon stock estimates and peat soil characterization , 2015 .

[6]  R. Grasty Radon emanation and soil moisture effects on airborne gamma-ray measurements , 1997 .

[7]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy , 1989 .

[8]  P. Arp,et al.  Modeling and mapping soil resistance to penetration and rutting using LiDAR-derived digital elevation data , 2013, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[9]  T. Tokola,et al.  Terrain mobility estimation using TWI and airborne gamma-ray data. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Improving a stem-damage monitoring system for a single-grip harvester using a logistic regression model in image processing , 2019 .

[11]  Tapio Pahikkala,et al.  New computational methods for efficient utilisation of public data , 2015 .

[12]  M. Yli-Halla Classification of acid sulphate soils of Finland according to Soil taxonomy and the FAO/Unesco legend , 1997 .

[13]  Mikko T. Niemi,et al.  Airborne LiDAR-derived elevation data in terrain trafficability mapping , 2017 .

[14]  J. Kangas,et al.  Applying voting theory in participatory decision support for sustainable timber harvesting , 2004 .

[15]  Jukka Heikkonen,et al.  Estimating the Rut Depth by UAV Photogrammetry , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[16]  A. Jõeleht,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar study of the Rahivere peat bog, eastern Estonia , 2011 .

[17]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Teijo Palander A local DLP-GIS-LP system for geographically decentralized wood procurement planning and decision making. , 1997 .

[19]  Amanda Sosa,et al.  Automated Volumetric Measurements of Truckloads through Multi-View Photogrammetry and 3D Reconstruction Software , 2019 .

[20]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  Modelling soil moisture – soil strength relationship of fine-grained upland forest soils , 2019, Silva Fennica.

[21]  Francesco Neri,et al.  The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: A review , 2015 .

[22]  Carlos Cabo,et al.  Structure from Motion Photogrammetry in Forestry: a Review , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[23]  Comparison of Selected Terramechanical Test Procedures and Cartographic Indices to Predict Rutting Caused by Machine Traffic during a Cut-to-Length Thinning Operation , 2021 .

[24]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[25]  Stephen D. Sebestyen,et al.  Uncertainty in Peat Volume and Soil Carbon Estimated Using Ground‐Penetrating Radar and Probing , 2012 .

[26]  K. Kärhä,et al.  Satisfaction and company loyalty as expressed by non-industrial private forest owners towards timber procurement organizations in Finland , 1998 .

[27]  Eija Hyvönen,et al.  Assessing site suitability for Scots pine using airborne and terrestrial gamma-ray measurements in Finnish Lapland , 2003 .

[28]  D. Charman,et al.  A method for modelling peat depth in blanket peatlands , 2012 .

[29]  Annika Kangas,et al.  A GIS-based stand management system for estimating local energy wood supplies , 2009 .

[30]  Thomas Hellström,et al.  Autonomous Forest Vehicles: Historic, envisioned, and state-of-the-art , 2009 .

[31]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  The significance of above-ground biomass, moisture content and mechanical properties of peat layer on the bearing capacity of ditched pine bogs , 2013 .

[32]  E. Ring,et al.  Mapping Temporal Dynamics in a Forest Stream Network—Implications for Riparian Forest Management , 2015 .

[33]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  Predicting rut depth induced by an 8-wheeled forwarder in fine-grained boreal forest soils , 2020, Annals of Forest Science.

[34]  P. Arp,et al.  Evaluating digital terrain indices for soil wetness mapping – a Swedish case study , 2014 .

[35]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  Utilizing Airborne Laser Scanning Technology in Predicting Bearing Capacity of Peatland Forest , 2012 .

[36]  N. Holden,et al.  Estimating the carbon stock of a blanket peat region using a peat depth inference model , 2011 .

[37]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  The Effect of Wider Logging Trails on Rut Formations in the Harvesting of Peatland Forests , 2015 .

[38]  Antti Suvinen A GIS-based simulation model for terrain tractability , 2006 .

[39]  Information Needs of Non-industrial Private Forest Owners After Logging Operations in Finland: A Case Study , 2020, Small-scale Forestry.

[40]  Denis J. Dean,et al.  Finding optimal routes for networks of harvest site access roads using GIS-based techniques , 1997 .

[41]  Jukka Heikkonen,et al.  Predicting Water Permeability of the Soil Based on Open Data , 2014, AIAI.

[42]  T. Palander,et al.  Excavator-based harvesters in wood cutting operations in Finland , 2007 .

[43]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Towards sustainable wood procurement in forest industry – The energy efficiency of larger and heavier vehicles in Finland , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[44]  Lianru Gao,et al.  Semantic Labeling of High Resolution Aerial Imagery and LiDAR Data with Fine Segmentation Network , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Matti Sirén,et al.  Equipping a Conventional Wheeled Forwarder for Peatland Operations , 2011 .

[46]  Jukka Heikkonen,et al.  Predictability of boreal forest soil bearing capacity by machine learning , 2016 .

[47]  P. Arp,et al.  Relating Cone Penetration and Rutting Resistance to Variations in Forest Soil Properties and Daily Moisture Fluctuations , 2017 .

[48]  Jukka Heikkonen,et al.  Estimating the prediction performance of spatial models via spatial k-fold cross validation , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[49]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of a Multi-View Stereo Approach for Phenotyping of Tomato Plants at the Organ Level , 2015, Sensors.

[50]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Tree Stem and Height Measurements using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and the RANSAC Algorithm , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[51]  Budi Setiawan,et al.  Digital mapping for cost-effective and accurate prediction of the depth and carbon stocks in Indonesian peatlands , 2016 .

[52]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  DETECTING AND ESTIMATING ATTRIBUTES FOR SINGLE TREES USING LASER SCANNER , 2006 .

[53]  M. Tobler,et al.  Peatlands of the Madre de Dios River of Peru: Distribution, Geomorphology, and Habitat Diversity , 2012, Wetlands.

[54]  M. Yli-Halla,et al.  Classification of Soils of Finland According to Soil Taxonomy , 1999 .

[55]  J. Heikkonen,et al.  Wheel rut measurements by forest machine-mounted LiDAR sensors – accuracy and potential for operational applications? , 2018 .

[56]  Ting-Li Su,et al.  Semi-Supervised Segmentation Framework Based on Spot-Divergence Supervoxelization of Multi-Sensor Fusion Data for Autonomous Forest Machine Applications , 2018, Sensors.

[57]  E. Marchi,et al.  Photogrammetric estimation of wheel rut dimensions and soil compaction after increasing numbers of forwarder passes , 2018 .

[58]  C. Akumu,et al.  Modeling peatland carbon stock in a delineated portion of the Nayshkootayaow river watershed in Far North, Ontario using an integrated GIS and remote sensing approach , 2014 .

[59]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Estimation of Tree Stem Attributes Using Terrestrial Photogrammetry with a Camera Rig , 2016 .

[60]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Feasibility of Google Tango and Kinect for Crowdsourcing Forestry Information , 2017 .

[61]  T. Palander,et al.  Comparison of Energy Efficiency Indicators of Road Transportation for Modeling Environmental Sustainability in “Green” Circular Industry , 2020, Sustainability.