Functional classification of scaffold proteins and related molecules

In this series of four minireviews the field of scaffold proteins and proteins of similar molecular/cellular functions is overviewed. By binding and bringing into proximity two or more signaling proteins, these proteins direct the flow of information in the cell by activating, coordinating and regulating signaling events in regulatory networks. Here we discuss the categories of scaffolds, anchors, docking proteins and adaptors in some detail, and using many examples we demonstrate that they cover a wide range of functional modes that appear to segregate into three practical categories, simple proteins binding two partners together (adaptors), larger multidomain proteins targeting and regulating more proteins in complex ways (scaffold/anchoring proteins) and proteins specialized to initiate signaling cascades by localizing partners at the cell membrane (docking proteins). It will also be shown, however, that the categories partially overlap and often their names are used interchangeably in the literature. In addition, although not usually considered as scaffolds, several other proteins, such as regulatory proteins with catalytic activity, phosphatase targeting subunits, E3 ubiquitin ligases, ESCRT proteins in endosomal sorting and DNA damage sensors also function by bona fide scaffolding mechanisms. Thus, the field is in a state of continuous advance and expansion, which demands that the classification scheme be regularly updated and, if needed, revised.

[1]  D. Bowtell,et al.  Stress‐induced decrease in TRAF2 stability is mediated by Siah2 , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[2]  D. Hartshorne,et al.  Myosin phosphatase target subunit: Many roles in cell function. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  T. Wilson,et al.  Procaspase 8 overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer promotes apoptosis induced by FLIP silencing , 2009, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[4]  István Simon,et al.  Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  R. Conaway,et al.  Emerging Roles of Ubiquitin in Transcription Regulation , 2002, Science.

[6]  N. Gotoh Regulation of growth factor signaling by FRS2 family docking/scaffold adaptor proteins , 2008, Cancer science.

[7]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2009 .

[8]  J. Hurley,et al.  Molecular Mechanism of Multivesicular Body Biogenesis by ESCRT Complexes , 2010, Nature.

[9]  A. Dunker,et al.  Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in scaffold proteins: getting more from less. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[11]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[12]  Guillermina Lozano,et al.  MDM2, an introduction. , 2003, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[13]  Fidel Ramírez,et al.  Finding scaffold proteins in interactomes. , 2010, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  B. Luisi,et al.  Reconstitution and analysis of the multienzyme Escherichia coli RNA degradosome. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsic disorder and protein function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[16]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  NIK is a new Ste20‐related kinase that binds NCK and MEKK1 and activates the SAPK/JNK cascade via a conserved regulatory domain , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[17]  R. Daly,et al.  Docking proteins , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[18]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Close encounters of the third kind: disordered domains and the interactions of proteins , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Dynamic control of signaling by modular adaptor proteins. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[20]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Structural disorder promotes assembly of protein complexes , 2007, BMC Structural Biology.

[21]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Redirecting tyrosine kinase signaling to an apoptotic caspase pathway through chimeric adaptor proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Shaw,et al.  Scaffold proteins and immune-cell signalling , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[23]  L. Buday,et al.  The Nck family of adapter proteins: regulators of actin cytoskeleton. , 2002, Cellular signalling.

[24]  Wei Feng,et al.  Organization and dynamics of PDZ-domain-related supramodules in the postsynaptic density , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Yigong Shi Assembly and structure of protein phosphatase 2A , 2009, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences.

[26]  A. Marshall,et al.  Phosphoinositide 3‐kinase‐regulated adapters in lymphocyte activation , 2009, Immunological reviews.

[27]  A. Reményi,et al.  Scaffolds are ‘active’ regulators of signaling modules , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[28]  István Simon,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035 Structural bioinformatics Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs , 2022 .

[29]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  Robert Kiss,et al.  High levels of structural disorder in scaffold proteins as exemplified by a novel neuronal protein, CASK‐interactive protein1 , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[31]  T. Pawson,et al.  Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. , 1997, Science.

[32]  P. Tompa Intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[33]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Scaffolds: interaction platforms for cellular signalling circuits. , 2009, Trends in cell biology.

[34]  Atanas V Koulov,et al.  Functional amyloid--from bacteria to humans. , 2007, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[35]  P. Tompa The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins , 2005, FEBS letters.

[36]  K. Legate,et al.  ILK, PINCH and parvin: the tIPP of integrin signalling , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[38]  Cheryl H Arrowsmith,et al.  Characterization of segments from the central region of BRCA1: an intrinsically disordered scaffold for multiple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions? , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content , 2005, Bioinform..

[40]  J. Downward,et al.  Requirement of multiple SH3 domains of Nck for ligand binding. , 1999, Cellular signalling.

[41]  L. Buday,et al.  Membrane-targeting of signalling molecules by SH2/SH3 domain-containing adaptor proteins. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[42]  Jeremy S Logue,et al.  Organizing signal transduction through A‐kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) , 2010, The FEBS journal.