Quantifying below-ground nitrogen of legumes. 2. A comparison of 15N and non isotopic methods

Accurate information on below-ground nitrogen (N) of legumes is necessary for quantifying legume effects on soil N pools and on the N economies of crops following legumes in rotation systems. We report a series of glasshouse pot experiments to determine below-ground N (BGN) of the four legumes, fababean (Vicia faba), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mungbean (Vigna radiata) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) using both 15N shoot-labelling and 15N-labelled soil isotope-dilution methods, a mass N balance approach and the physical recovery of nodulated roots. Data from the 15N shoot-labelling experiment were manipulated in different ways in an attempt to counter errors associated with uneven 15N enrichment of roots and nodules. Values for BGN as percent of total plant N based on the physical recovery of nodulated roots ranged from 4 to 15%. With 15N shoot-labelling, a total of 8.11 mg 15N was supplied to each pot (six plants) as 0.5% 15N urea using either leaf-flap (fababean, mungbean and pigeonpea), petiole (chickpea) or leaf-tip (wheat) feeding. Calculations based on measurement of 15N enrichments of harvested plant parts and root-zone soil suggested that BGN represented 39% of total plant N for fababean, 53% for chickpea, 20% for mungbean and 47% for pigeonpea. The value for wheat was 60%. Adjustment for uneven nodulation patterns on the roots and nodule 15N depletion, resulting in different 15N enrichments between nodulated and unnodulated roots, reduced the fababean value to 37% and chickpea to 42%. Values using the other methods were generally in the same range, viz. 15–57% (simple 15N balance), 11–52% (soil 15N dilution) and 30–52% (mass N balance). We conclude that physical recovery of roots was the most inaccurate method for estimating BGN. Average values for BGN as percent of total plant N using all isotopic and mass N balance methods were 30% for fababean, 48% for chickpea, 28% for mungbean, and 43% for pigeonpea.15N shoot-labelling may be the best method for quantifying BGN of field-grown plants. The methodology is simple, apparently accurate provided care is taken in obtaining representative nodulated root samples and, unlike the soil 15N dilution method, does not require pre-treatment of the soil with 15N enriched material.

[1]  J. Mcdonagh,et al.  Nitrogen fixation by groundnut and soyabean and residual nitrogen benefits to rice in farmers' fields in Northeast Thailand , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[2]  A. McNeill,et al.  Use of in situ 15N-labelling to estimate the total below-ground nitrogen of pasture legumes in intact soil–plant systems , 1997 .

[3]  A. Chapman,et al.  Nitrogen contributed by grain legumes to rice grown in rotation on the Cununurra soils of the Ord Irrigation Area, Western Australia , 1987 .

[4]  D. Cooke,et al.  YIELD OF DRY MATTER AND NITROGEN FROM TOPS AND ROOTS OF SWEETCLOVER, ALFALFA AND RED CLOVER AT FIVE STAGES OF GROWTH , 1969 .

[5]  M. Peoples,et al.  Faba beans and other legumes add nitrogen to irrigated cotton cropping systems , 1998 .

[6]  Mark B. Peoples,et al.  Quantifying below-ground nitrogen of legumes , 2002, Plant and Soil.

[7]  J. Pate,et al.  An appraisal of recent field measurements of symbiotic N2 fixation by annual legumes , 2000 .

[8]  Erik Steen Jensen,et al.  Rhizodeposition of N by pea and barley and its effect on soil N dynamics , 1996 .

[9]  D. Herridge Relative abundance of ureides and nitrate in plant tissues of soybean as a quantitative assay of nitrogen fixation. , 1982, Plant physiology.

[10]  C. Russell,et al.  Estimates of lupin below-ground biomass nitrogen, dry matter, and nitrogen turnover to wheat , 1996 .

[11]  J. Brockwell,et al.  Effects of available soil N and rates of inoculation on nitrogen fixation by irrigated soybeans and evaluation of δ15N methods for measurement , 1989 .

[12]  A. Sheldrake,et al.  Growth, development and nutrient uptake in pigeonpeas (Cajanus cajan) , 1979, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[13]  M. C. Crawford,et al.  Root production of a barrel medic (Medicago truncatula) pasture, a barley grass (Hordeum leporinum) pasture, and a faba bean (Vicia faba) crop in southern Australia , 1997 .

[14]  C. Russell,et al.  In situ 15N labelling of lupin below-ground biomass , 1996 .

[15]  D. Focht,et al.  Quantification by direct 15N dilution of fixed N2 incorporation into soil by Cajanus cajan (Pigeon Pea) , 1986 .

[16]  J. Palta,et al.  Leaf Feeding of [15N]Urea for Labelling Wheat With Nitrogen , 1991 .

[17]  A. McNeill,et al.  A NEW APPROACH TO QUANTIFYING THE N BENEFIT FROM PASTURE LEGUMES TO SUCCEEDING WHEAT , 1998 .