The application of supervised machine learning techniques for multivariate modelling of gas component viscosity: A comparative study

Abstract Accurate prediction of gas component viscosity is crucial in gas processing, heat and mass transfer and flow calculations, as well as gas reserves estimation. Many models have been proposed to predict the viscosity of gas components, but they have limited temperature and pressure ranges. Furthermore, machine learning-based methods have not been widely used, and it remains unclear if there are benefits from these approaches. In this study, we explore gas component viscosity prediction versus molecular weight, critical properties, acentric factor, normal boiling point, dipole moment, and temperature using 38 supervised machine learning algorithms. The algorithms are tested by using 4673 data sets for 1602 organic and inorganic gas components collected from the literature. In addition, we compare the outputs of the best predictive model with the viscosity models provided in the literature. The results show that the best performing algorithm is a hidden layer neural network model containing eight neurons with a Bayesian regularization algorithm as a training algorithm and tan-sigmoid and linear transfer functions. Examining the model with an experimental dataset, which has not been used in the model development process, shows that the performance of the proposed model has an absolute mean relative error of 7.2% from experimental measurements.

[1]  Amin Shokrollahi,et al.  State-of-the-Art Least Square Support Vector Machine Application for Accurate Determination of Natural Gas Viscosity , 2014 .

[2]  Palash Panja,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence to forecast hydrocarbon production from shales , 2017 .

[3]  Tatyana Plaksina,et al.  On improving the hydrogen and methanol production using an auto-thermal double-membrane reactor: Model prediction and optimisation , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[4]  C. G. Chua,et al.  Bayesian Neural Network Analysis of Undrained Side Resistance of Drilled Shafts , 2005 .

[5]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[6]  E. M. El-M. Shokir,et al.  Artificial neural networks modeling for hydrocarbon gas viscosity and density estimation , 2011 .

[7]  B. Dabir,et al.  Modeling gas/vapor viscosity of hydrocarbon fluids using a hybrid GMDH-type neural network system , 2017 .

[8]  C. Yaws Chemical properties handbook , 1999 .

[9]  D. Karaboga,et al.  A Simple and Global Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Problems: Differential Evolution Algorithm , 2004 .

[10]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[11]  Shahaboddin Shamshirband,et al.  Rigorous prognostication of natural gas viscosity: Smart modeling and comparative study , 2018, Fuel.

[12]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[13]  William Y. Svrcek,et al.  A review of practical calculation methods for the viscosity of liquid hydrocarbons and their mixtures , 1996 .

[14]  Viscosity model for pure gases at atmospheric conditions , 2005 .

[15]  A. Mehrotra A generalized viscosity equation for pure heavy hydrocarbons , 1991 .

[16]  Ji Li,et al.  Data Driven Production Forecasting Using Machine Learning , 2016 .

[17]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[18]  Amir H. Mohammadi,et al.  A smooth model for the estimation of gas/vapor viscosity of hydrocarbon fluids , 2015 .

[19]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties , 1988 .

[20]  William Y. Svrcek,et al.  Viscosity : a critical review of practical predictive and correlative methods , 1995 .

[21]  Sachin Ahuja,et al.  Machine learning and its applications: A review , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence (ICBDAC).

[22]  Christian Blum,et al.  Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends , 2005 .

[23]  Erfan Mohagheghian,et al.  An application of evolutionary algorithms for WAG optimisation in the Norne Field , 2016 .

[24]  Tatyana Plaksina,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence techniques in the petroleum industry: a review , 2019, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[25]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[26]  K. Stephan,et al.  Viscosity of Dense Fluids , 1979 .

[27]  Robert D. Trengove,et al.  The Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Sulfur Hexafluoride in the Limit of Zero Density , 1987 .

[28]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Applications of kinetic gas theories and multiparameter correlation for prediction of dilute gas viscosity and thermal conductivity , 1984 .

[29]  Efficient methods for calculations of compressibility, density and viscosity of natural gases , 2004 .

[30]  Zhangxing Chen,et al.  Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating permeability and porosity of oil reservoirs via petro-physical logs , 2019, Petroleum.