Impact of Infrastructure Characteristics on Road Crashes on Two-Lane Highways

Objective. The main purpose of this study is to estimate and quantify the contribution of the infrastructure to highway crashes and to develop an infrastructure coefficient, that represents the overall characteristics of the highway and could be used as an independent variable in a crash-prediction model. Methods. The infrastructure is defined in this study as the highway and its geometric features, including alignment, road-side elements, sight-distances, presence of guardrails, access-points, roadway consistency, and additional variables that measure the overall quality of the highway alignment and elements. The analysis and developments are conducted for two-lane rural highways. The approach taken is to identify the high crash-rate roads, those with crash rates above 0.25 crashes per million vehicle-km, by Smallest Space Analysis. This type of analysis allows the aggregation of higher crash-rate roads versus lower-crash-rate roads only by their infrastructure coefficients, without consideration of their crash records. Results. Crash rates that are attached by Smallest Space Analysis to the group of roads that had less desirable infrastructure features show a high correlation between the same roads and high crash rates vs. identified better infrastructures and low crash rates. Further analysis shows that low crash-rate infrastructure, as defined in this study for two-lane rural highways, can reduce the crash rate by 44% versus high crash-rate infrastructure, at the 99% confidence level, which is almost a certainty. A model for the prediction of crash rates based on a proposed infrastructure coefficient is calibrated and presented. Conclusions. It is suggested that this model be used in evaluating alternatives for new highways or in improving the alignment and road features of existing highways.

[1]  A. Polus,et al.  New Consistency Model for Rural Highways and Its Relationship to Safety , 2004 .

[2]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  PREDICTION OF THE EXPECTED SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF RURAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS , 2000 .

[4]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1964 .

[5]  C Zegeer,et al.  SAFETY RELATIONSHIPS ASSOCIATED WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL ROADWAY ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[6]  K W Ogden,et al.  The effects of paved shoulders on accidents on rural highways. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  R Elvik,et al.  The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: a meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  M Henderson.  Human factors in traffic safety: a reappraisal , 1971 .

[9]  A Polus.  RELATIONSHIP OF OVERALL GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS TO THE SAFETY LEVEL OF RURAL HIGHWAYS , 1980 .

[10]  D. Shinar.  Psychology on the Road: The Human Factor in Traffic Safety , 1978 .

[11]  Matthew G Karlaftis,et al.  Effects of road geometry and traffic volumes on rural roadway accident rates. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  R A Krammes,et al.  TANGENT LENGTH AND SIGHT DISTANCE EFFECTS ON ACCIDENT RATES AT HORIZONTAL CURVES ON RURAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS , 1995 .

[13]  Jr. John Hickey.  Shoulder Rumble Strip Effectiveness: Drift-Off-Road Accident Reductions on the Pennsylvania Turnpike , 1997 .

[14]  Jake Kononov.  Relationship between traffic safety and traffic volume on rural freeways and conceptual development of the level of service of safety , 2000 .

[15]  Nalini Ravishanker,et al.  Selecting exposure measures in crash rate prediction for two-lane highway segments. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.