Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density.

In a recent article, Tversky questioned the application of geometric models to similarity data and proposed an alternative set-theoretic approach. He suggested that geometric models are inappropriate because the similarity data may violate the metric assumptions underlying such models. In addition, he demonstrated that the stimulus context and the nature of the experimental task can affect the similarity relations. The present article suggests that a geometric approach may be compatible with these effects if the traditional multidimensional scaling model is augmented by the assumption that spatial density in the configuration has an effect on the similarity measure. A distance-densi ty model is outlined that assumes that similarity is a function of both interpoint distance and the spatial density of other stimulus points in the surrounding region of the metric space. The proposed relationship between similarity and spatial density is supported by empirical evidence. The distance-density model is shown to be able to account for violations of the metric axioms and certain context and task effects. A number of other issues are discussed with respect to geometric and set-theoretic models of similarity.

[1]  M. Wertheimer Numbers and numerical concepts in primitive peoples. , 1938 .

[2]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  Dimensions of similarity. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  E. R. Grossman The Measurement of Discriminability , 1955 .

[4]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[5]  E. Rothkopf A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  M A WALLACH,et al.  On psychological similarity. , 1958, Psychological review.

[7]  E Z ROTHKOPF Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[9]  B. Murdock,et al.  The distinctiveness of stimuli. , 1960, Psychological review.

[10]  A. Parducci,et al.  Context-effects in judgements of length. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[12]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Range-frequency compromise in judgment. , 1963 .

[13]  R N SHEPARD,et al.  Analysis of Proximities as a Technique for the Study of Information Processing in Man1 , 1963, Human factors.

[14]  R. Shepard Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[15]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[16]  W. Torgerson,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of similarity , 1965, Psychometrika.

[17]  W. R. Garner To perceive is to know. , 1966 .

[18]  W J Levelt,et al.  Triadic comparisons of musical intervals. , 1966, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[19]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The structure of visual pattern associates and pattern goodness , 1966 .

[20]  W. Hoffman The Lie algebra of visual perception , 1966 .

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  D. C. Donderi,et al.  Decision latencies of “same” and “different” judgments , 1968 .

[25]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[28]  D. Meyer On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information , 1970 .

[29]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency , 1971 .

[30]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[31]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[32]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[33]  E. E. David,et al.  Human communication : a unified view , 1972 .

[34]  E Goldmeier,et al.  Similarity in visually perceived forms. , 1972, Psychological issues.

[35]  George Lakoff,et al.  Fuzzy Grammar and the Performance/Competence Terminology Game , 1973 .

[36]  George Lakoff,et al.  Hedges: A Study In Meaning Criteria And The Logic Of Fuzzy Concepts , 1973 .

[37]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[38]  D. Rumelhart,et al.  A model for analogical reasoning. , 1973 .

[39]  F Gravetter,et al.  Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. , 1973, Psychological review.

[40]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic Memory and Psychological Semantics , 1974, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[41]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Verbs of judging, judged: A case study , 1974 .

[42]  R. Shepard Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[43]  M. Galy,et al.  Papers from the tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19-21, 1974 , 1974 .

[44]  R. Shepard,et al.  Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. , 1974 .

[45]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales , 1974 .

[46]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[47]  R. Shepard,et al.  Monotone mapping of similarities into a general metric space , 1974 .

[48]  A. Parducci Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[49]  J. Lackner,et al.  The Psychological Representation of Speech Sounds , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[51]  E. Rosch Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  E. Rosch The nature of mental codes for color categories. , 1975 .

[53]  R. L. Solso Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .

[54]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Robert A. M. Gregson,et al.  Psychometrics of similarity , 1975 .

[56]  L. Rips Inductive judgments about natural categories. , 1975 .

[57]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[58]  E. Rosch,et al.  Structural bases of typicality effects. , 1976 .

[59]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A context-sensitive representation of word meanings , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[60]  David M. Green,et al.  Effects of practice and distribution of auditory signals on absolute identification , 1977 .

[61]  S Imai Pattern similarity and cognitive transformations. , 1977, Acta psychologica.

[62]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[63]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[64]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  TRANSFORMATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF OBJECTS IN SPACE , 1978 .

[65]  N. Goodman Problems and projects , 1979 .

[66]  A method for the investigation of those transformations under which the visual recognition of a given object is invariant , 1972, Kybernetik.

[67]  David H. Foster,et al.  A method for the investigation of those transformations under which the visual recognition of a given object is invariant , 2004, Kybernetik.

[68]  W. James The principles of psychology , 1983 .