Process analysis applied to water reuse for a “closed water cycle” approach

Abstract The reuse of wastewater is a key factor in a closed water cycle approach, in which wastewater is treated and then reused. This approach is both mandatory for the development of dry areas and necessary for the sustainability of industrialized countries in terms of environmental impacts and resource preservation. Although there are some virtuous examples of water reuse projects in the world, there is still much to be done, especially in terms of incentives and economic viability. Aim of the present paper is to give thermodynamic and engineering elements in order to develop an economic incentive to promote wastewater reuse and to adopt the closed water cycle approach. At this scope a techno-economic analysis of the civil wastewater depuration and reverse osmosis treatment of the secondary effluent is presented, by using the typical approach of the chemical engineering. The cost of the treated water in relation to the fundamental parameters of the plant is calculated together with an “energy based” incentive, evaluated through the efficiency of the state-of-the-art desalination process. This last can make a reuse project economically feasible on the basis of rigorous thermodynamic considerations. These latter give a universal character to the incentive calculation and also reward the process optimization towards the goal of lowering the carbon emissions. The validity of the proposed method is evaluated through the analysis of three wastewater treatment and reuse projects at different scale. The results show how it is possible to obtain a positive Earnings Before Interests and Taxes (EBIT) for plant productivity above the 200 m3/day, by including the proposed incentive in the Business Plan of the integrated plant of Water Treatment and Reuse.

[1]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[2]  Seung Jin Oh,et al.  Recent developments in thermally-driven seawater desalination: Energy efficiency improvement by hybridization of the MED and AD cycles , 2015 .

[3]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Beyond User Acceptance: A Legitimacy Framework for Potable Water Reuse in California. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  M. Ravagnani,et al.  Reuse water network synthesis by modified PSO approach , 2012 .

[5]  M. Khayet,et al.  Integrated direct contact membrane distillation for olive mill wastewater treatment , 2013 .

[6]  Marina Prisciandaro,et al.  Reverse osmosis membranes for treatment of produced water: a process analysis , 2015 .

[7]  Liqa Raschid-Sally,et al.  Global Wastewater and Sludge Production, Treatment and Use , 2015 .

[8]  Bruce Durham,et al.  Wastewater reuse through dual-membrane processes: opportunities for sustainable water resources☆ , 1999 .

[9]  A. Salladini,et al.  Ultrafiltration of biologically treated wastewater by using backflushing , 2007 .

[10]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: a case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Produced water treatment: Application of Air Gap Membrane Distillation , 2013 .

[12]  Nitirach Sa-nguanduan,et al.  Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: A case from Thailand , 2011 .

[13]  Sara Dolnicar,et al.  Desalinated Versus Recycled Water - What Does the Public Think? , 2010 .

[14]  Javier Uche,et al.  Emergy analysis applied to the estimation of the recovery of costs for water services under the European Water Framework Directive , 2010 .

[15]  D. Barba,et al.  Disinfection of surface waters with UF membranes , 2005 .

[16]  Jin-Kuk Kim,et al.  Integrated water networks optimisation under uncertainty , 2011 .

[17]  G. M. D. Celso,et al.  Back-flush effects on superficial water ultrafiltration , 2010 .

[18]  Mickael Vourch,et al.  Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse , 2008 .

[19]  S. Dolnicar,et al.  Drinking water from alternative water sources: differences in beliefs, social norms and factors of perceived behavioural control across eight Australian locations. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.