A multi-expert system for ranking patents: An approach based on fuzzy pay-off distributions and a TOPSIS-AHP framework

The aim of this paper is to introduce a decision support system that ranks patents based on multiple expert evaluations. The presented approach starts with the creation of three value scenarios for each considered patent by each expert. These are used for the construction of individual fuzzy pay-off distribution functions for the patent value; a consensual fuzzy pay-off distribution is then determined starting from the individual distributions. Possibilistic moments are calculated from the consensus pay-off distribution for each patent and used in ranking them with TOPSIS. It is further showed how the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can be used to include additional decision variables into the patent selection, thus allowing for a two-tier decision making process. The system is illustrated with a numerical example and the usability of the system and the combination of methods it includes for patent portfolio selection in the real world context is discussed.

[1]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[2]  Robert F. Reilly,et al.  Valuing Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[3]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Consensus Modelling in Group Decision Making: A Dynamical Approach Based on Zadeh's Fuzzy Preferences , 2007, On Fuzziness.

[4]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  The Dynamics of Consensus in Group Decision Making: Investigating the Pairwise Interactions between Fuzzy Preferences , 2010, Preferences and Decisions.

[5]  Blake Johnson,et al.  A Practical Method for Valuing Real Options: The Boeing Approach , 2007 .

[6]  Mikael Collan,et al.  A Fuzzy Pay-Off Method for Real Option Valuation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[8]  Robert Fuller,et al.  Numerical Patent Analysis with the Fuzzy Pay-Off Method: Valuing a Compound Real Option , 2011, 2011 Fourth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering.

[9]  S. Triest,et al.  Valuing patents on cost-reducing technology: A case study , 2007 .

[10]  Przemyslaw Grzegorzewski,et al.  Metrics and orders in space of fuzzy numbers , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  R. L. Parr,et al.  Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets , 1989 .

[12]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks , 2010, Soft Comput..

[13]  Scott Mathews,et al.  Business Engineering: A Practical Approach to Valuing High-Risk, High-Return Projects Using Real Options , 2007 .

[14]  Caterina Camus,et al.  Intellectual assets management: from patents to knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  L. Zadeh.  A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[16]  Z. Xu,et al.  On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Elettra Agliardi,et al.  An application of fuzzy methods to evaluate a patent under the chance of litigation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[19]  Mikael Collan.  Valuation Of Industrial Giga-Investments: Theory And Practice , 2011 .

[20]  Mikael Collan,et al.  A Practical Approach to R&D Portfolio Selection Using the Fuzzy Pay-Off Method , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[21]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Soft consensus and network dynamics in group decision making , 1999, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[23]  Wen-Yau Liang,et al.  A rough set based approach to patent development with the consideration of resource allocation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Mikael Collan.  A DSS for supporting area development decision-making , 2010, 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering.

[25]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  On Possibilistic Mean Value and Variance of Fuzzy Numbers , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[26]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[27]  Mikael Collan,et al.  A Procedure for the Rapid Pre-acquisition Screening of Target Companies Using the Pay-off Method for Real Option Valuation ∗ , 2011 .

[28]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Consensual Dynamics in Group Decision Making with Triangular Fuzzy Numbers , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[29]  E. Ertugrul Karsak.  A Generalized Fuzzy Optimization Framework for R&D Project Selection Using Real Options Valuation , 2006, ICCSA.

[30]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic , 1991 .

[31]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[32]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[33]  Mikael Collan,et al.  Enhancing Patent Valuation with the Pay-off Method , 2011 .

[34]  William Voxman,et al.  Some remarks on distances between fuzzy numbers , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[35]  Gudrun Littmann-Hilmer,et al.  SME tailor-designed patent portfolio analysis , 2009 .

[36]  Robert Fullér,et al.  On Weighted Possibilistic Mean and Variance of Fuzzy Numbers , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[37]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[38]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..