Effects of management decisions on genetic evaluation of simulated calving records using random regression.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of various data structures on the genetic evaluation for the binary phenotype of reproductive success. The data were simulated based on an existing pedigree and an underlying fertility phenotype with a heritability of 0.10. A data set of complete observations was generated for all cows. This data set was then modified mimicking the culling of cows when they first failed to reproduce, cows having a missing observation at either their second or fifth opportunity to reproduce as if they had been selected as donors for embryo transfer, and censoring records following the sixth opportunity to reproduce as in a cull-for-age strategy. The data were analyzed using a third-order polynomial random regression model. The EBV of interest for each animal was the sum of the age-specific EBV over the first 10 observations (reproductive success at ages 2-11). Thus, the EBV might be interpreted as the genetic expectation of number of calves produced when a female is given 10 opportunities to calve. Culling open cows resulted in the EBV for 3-yr-old cows being reduced from 8.27 ± 0.03 when open cows were retained to 7.60 ± 0.02 when they were culled. The magnitude of this effect decreased as cows grew older when they first failed to reproduce and were subsequently culled. Cows that did not fail over the 11 yr of simulated data had an EBV of 9.43 ± 0.01 and 9.35 ± 0.01 based on analyses of the complete data and the data in which cows that failed to reproduce were culled, respectively. Cows that had a missing observation for their second record had a significantly reduced EBV, but the corresponding effect at the fifth record was negligible. The current study illustrates that culling and management decisions, and particularly those that affect the beginning of the trajectory of sustained reproductive success, can influence both the magnitude and accuracy of resulting EBV.

[1]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Analysis of censored survival data using random regression models , 2001 .

[2]  J. Taylor,et al.  Genetic variation and covariation in beef cow and bull fertility. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[3]  M. Bulmer,et al.  The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[4]  C. Morris,et al.  Genetic improvement of beef cattle in New Zealand: breeding objectives , 1992 .

[5]  E. J. Pollak,et al.  Length of Productive Life of Dairy Cows. 1. Justification of a Weibull Model , 1988 .

[6]  M. MacNeil Value of genomics in breeding objectives for beef cattle , 2016 .

[7]  G. Renand,et al.  Developing a breeding objective for a French purebred beef cattle selection programme 1 3rd submissi , 1998 .

[8]  G. Simm,et al.  Genetic parameters for a maternal breeding goal in beef production. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[9]  P. Dziuk,et al.  Management of Reproduction of Beef Cattle, Sheep and Pigs , 1983 .

[10]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Reduction of the number of parameters needed for a polynomial random regression test day model , 2000 .

[11]  A. Azzam,et al.  A Markovian decision model for beef cattle replacement that considers spring and fall calving. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[12]  S. Hammack Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Production. , 1986 .

[13]  M. MacNeil,et al.  Invited review: research contributions from seventy-five years of breeding Line 1 Hereford cattle at Miles City, Montana. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[14]  R. Kemp,et al.  Estimates of genetic parameters for stayability to consecutive calvings of Canadian Simmentals by random regression models. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[15]  J. Jamrozik,et al.  Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective. , 2008, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[16]  A prototype national cattle evaluation for sustained reproductive success in Hereford cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[17]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction effects in genetic evaluation of preweaning gain for Line 1 Hereford cattle from Miles City, Montana. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[18]  Milt G. Thomas,et al.  Reproductive Traits and Their Heritabilities in Beef Cattle , 2009 .

[19]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Relationship Between Production and Stayability in Holstein Cattle , 1981 .

[20]  R. Bourdon,et al.  Within-herd genetic analyses of stayability of beef females. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[21]  R. L. Prentice,et al.  Exponential survivals with censoring and explanatory variables , 1973 .

[22]  B. Knapp,et al.  Selection for postweaning growth in inbred Hereford cattle: the Fort Keogh, Montana line 1 example. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[23]  K. Meyer,et al.  Estimates of heritability and repeatability for reproductive traits in Australian beef cattle. , 1990 .