Exploiting plaintiffs through settlement: Divide and conquer

This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and N plaintiffs when there are fixed costs of litigation. When making simultaneous take-it-or-leave-it offers to the plaintiffs, the defendant adopts a divide-and-conquer strategy. Plaintiffs settle their claims for less than they are jointly worth. The problem is worse when N is larger, the offers are sequential, and the plaintiffs make offers instead. Although divide-and-conquer strategies dilute the defendant's incentives, they increase the settlement rate and reduce litigation spending. Plaintiffs can raise their joint payoff through transfer payments, voting rules, and covenants not to accept discriminatory offers.

[1]  Bruce H. Kobayashi ECONOMICS of litigation. , 2017, Lancet.

[2]  Vivek F. Farias,et al.  An approximate dynamic programming approach to solving dynamic oligopoly models , 2012 .

[3]  O. Bar‐Gill,et al.  The Prisoners’ (Plea Bargain) Dilemma , 2009 .

[4]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Exploiting Plaintiffs through Settlement: Divide and Conquer. Comment , 2008 .

[5]  A. Stremitzer Exploiting plaintiffs through settlement: Divide and conquer , 2008 .

[6]  Jennifer F. Reinganum,et al.  Economic Theories of Settlement Bargaining , 2005 .

[7]  Xinyu Hua,et al.  Information and Externalities in Sequential Litigation , 2004 .

[8]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Coordination and discrimination in contracting with externalities: divide and conquer? , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[9]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[10]  A. Choi Allocating Settlement Authority Under a Contingent-Fee Arrangement , 2003 .

[11]  M. Whinston,et al.  Robust Predictions for Bilateral Contracting with Externalities , 2003 .

[12]  K. Spier “Tied to the Mast”: Most‐Favored‐Nation Clauses in Settlement Contracts , 2003, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[13]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  The Economics of Collective Negotiation in Pretrial Bargaining , 2002 .

[14]  Jennifer F. Reinganum,et al.  Informational Externalities in Settlement Bargaining: Confidentiality and Correlated Culpability , 2002 .

[15]  Kathryn E. Spier,et al.  Settlement with Multiple Plaintiffs: The Role of Insolvency , 2002 .

[16]  Jennifer F. Reinganum,et al.  Exploiting Future Settlements: A Signaling Model of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Settlement Bargaining , 2002 .

[17]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Naked Exclusion: Comment , 2000 .

[18]  Hilary A. Sigman,et al.  Incentives to Settle Under Joint and Several Liability: An Empirical Analysis of Superfund Litigation , 1999, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[19]  I. Segal Contracting with Externalities , 1997 .

[20]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Fundamental Divergence Between the Private and the Social Motive to Use the Legal System , 1997, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[21]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Equilibrium formation of class action suits , 1996 .

[22]  Daniel Klerman Settling Multidefendant Lawsuits: The Advantage of Conditional Setoff Rules , 1996, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[23]  Lewis A. Kornhauser,et al.  Multidefendant Settlements: The Impact of Joint and Several Liability , 1994, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[24]  Lewis A. Kornhauser,et al.  Multidefendant Settlements under Joint and Several Liability: The Problem of Insolvency , 1994, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[25]  K. Spier A Note on Joint and Several Liability: Insolvency, Settlement, and Incentives , 1994, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[26]  A. Sykes "Bad Faith" Refusal to Settle by Liability Insurers: Some Implications of the Judgment-Proof Problem , 1994, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[27]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  The Role of Precedents in Repeated Litigation , 1993 .

[28]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  The deterrent effects of settlements and trials , 1988 .

[29]  Oliver Hart,et al.  One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control , 1987 .

[30]  M. Whinston,et al.  Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts , 1987 .

[31]  research platform to scholars worldwide. The Use of “Most-Favored-Nation ” Clauses in Settlement of Litigation , 2001 .

[32]  Andrew F. Daughety,et al.  Hush Money , 1999 .

[33]  K. Spier,et al.  Capital Structure , Priority Rules , and the Settlement of Civil Claims , 1998 .

[34]  Andrew T. Guzman How Would You Like to Pay for that? The Strategic Effects of Fee Arrangements on Settlement Terms , 1996 .

[35]  Richard J. Sexton,et al.  Strategic buyers and exclusionary contracts , 1994 .

[36]  M. Meurer The Gains from Faith in an Unfaithful Agent: Settlement Conflict between Defendants and Liability Insurers , 1992 .

[37]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution , 1989 .