Meta-Analysis of Group Learning Activities: Empirically Based Teaching Recommendations

Teaching researchers commonly employ group-based collaborative learning approaches in Teaching of Psychology teaching activities. However, the authors know relatively little about the effectiveness of group-based activities in relation to known psychological processes associated with group dynamics. Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analytic examination of whether learning outcomes are moderated by aspects of group process and collaborative learning. Results indicated that (a) group duration of a brief period (one to three classes) was more effective than group duration lasting more than one-half semester, (b) high levels of participant interdependence were associated with greater learning outcomes, and (c) group activities incorporating a formal group project presentation evidenced significantly less robust learning outcomes than activities that did not include a formal group presentation. Based on the findings, the authors provide teaching suggestions that reflect how group processes may impact learning effectiveness.

[1]  Timothy J. Lawson,et al.  Confronting Prejudiced Comments: Effectiveness of a Role-Playing Exercise , 2010 .

[2]  Jack R. Lohmann,et al.  Building a Community of Scholars: The Role of the Journal of Engineering Education as a Research Journal , 2005 .

[3]  A Case-Conference Exercise to Facilitate Understanding of Paradigms in Abnormal Psychology , 2002 .

[4]  Larry K. Michaelsen,et al.  The essential elements of team‐based learning , 2008 .

[5]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science , 1989 .

[6]  A Multi-Modal Active Learning Experience for Teaching Social Categorization , 2011 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[8]  R. Wesp,et al.  Developing Critical Thinking through the Study of Paranormal Phenomena , 1998 .

[9]  M. B. Marr.  COOPERATIVE LEARNING: A BRIEF REVIEW , 1997 .

[10]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Self-identification and accountability. , 1989 .

[11]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science , 1991 .

[12]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[13]  M. Miserandino.  Heeeere's Johnny: A Case Study in the Five Factor Model of Personality , 2007 .

[14]  R. Slavin.  Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .

[15]  Linda Lohr,et al.  Psychology of learning for instruction , 2005 .

[16]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review , 1999 .

[17]  T. Lineweaver.  Online Discussion Assignments Improve Students' Class Preparation , 2010 .

[18]  Krista D. Forrest.  Overcoming Unintentional Barriers with Intentional Strategies: Educating Faculty about Student Disabilities , 2003 .

[19]  David S. Kreiner,et al.  Incorporating Active Learning with PowerPoint-Based Lectures Using Content-Based Questions , 2009 .

[20]  The Power of Teaching Activities: Statistical and Methodological Recommendations , 2009 .

[21]  J. Slate,et al.  Teaching about Puberty: Learning to Talk about Sensitive Topics , 1986 .

[22]  N. Webb.  Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[23]  R. Slavin.  Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. , 1981 .

[24]  J. McKimm,et al.  Small group teaching. , 2009, British journal of hospital medicine.

[25]  Thomas A. Timmerman.  Survey Design and Multiple Regression: Frequently Encountered, but Infrequently Covered , 2000 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .

[27]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[28]  Angela M. O'Donnell.  Implications of Vygotsky ' s Theory for Peer Learning , 2003 .

[29]  Nigel K. L. Pope,et al.  The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment , 2005 .

[30]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[31]  Matt J. Gray,et al.  A Course Designed to Improve Psychological Critical Thinking , 2007 .

[32]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical power: concepts, procedures, and applications. , 1996, Behaviour research and therapy.

[33]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Effects of Group Size on Cognitive Effort and Evaluation , 1977 .

[34]  Ann Walker,et al.  British Psychology Students' Perceptions of Group-Work and Peer Assessment , 2001 .

[35]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .

[36]  K. Goedert,et al.  The Pedagogical Value of Experimental Participation Paired with Course Content , 2005 .

[37]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  Essentials of Learning for Instruction , 1988 .

[38]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[39]  Christie Cathey,et al.  Power of Peer Review: An Online Collaborative Learning Assignment in Social Psychology , 2007 .

[40]  Steven A. Freeman,et al.  Using Peer Assessments in Team Activities , 2003 .

[41]  J. Nevid,et al.  Effects on Content Acquisition of Signaling Key Concepts in Text Material , 2003 .

[42]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[43]  D. Bacon.  The Effect of Group Projects on Content-Related Learning , 2005 .

[44]  L. Hedges,et al.  The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[45]  Marcy P. Driscoll,et al.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction (3rd ed. , 2005 .

[46]  David V. Perkins,et al.  A “Jigsaw Classroom” Technique for Undergraduate Statistics Courses , 2001 .

[47]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[48]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[49]  Teaching Random Assignment: A Classroom Demonstration Using a Deck of Playing Cards , 2006 .

[50]  Dana S. Dunn.  Letter Exchanges on Statistics and Research Methods: Writing, Responding, and Learning. , 2000 .

[51]  M. Dimatteo.  Variations in Patients’ Adherence to Medical Recommendations: A Quantitative Review of 50 Years of Research , 2004, Medical care.

[52]  R. Foels,et al.  Teaching about Psychological Disorders: Using a Group Interviewing ad Diagnostic Approach , 2006 .

[53]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[54]  Stephen B. Blessing,et al.  PsychBusters: A Means of Fostering Critical Thinking in the Introductory Course , 2010 .

[55]  Gary L. May,et al.  Collaborative Peer Evaluation: Best Practices for Group Member Assessments , 2002 .

[56]  Thomas Lee Budesheim,et al.  Consider the Opposite: Opening Minds through in-Class Debates on Course-Related Controversies , 1999 .

[57]  R. Landrum,et al.  Alumni Perceptions of Workforce Readiness , 2010 .

[58]  M. Drouin.  Group-Based Formative Summative Assessment Relates to Improved Student Performance and Satisfaction , 2010 .

[59]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[60]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Rob Foels,et al.  Assessing Effective Teaching of Psychology: A Meta-Analytic Integration of Learning Outcomes , 2008 .

[62]  Gregory J. Marchant.  Student Reading of Assigned Articles: Will This Be on the Test?. , 2002 .

[63]  Exposure to the Fields of Psychology: Evaluation of an Introductory Psychology Project , 2004 .

[64]  E. Wheeler,et al.  Using writing to enhance collaborative learning in engineering courses , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[65]  B. Ellis,et al.  Convergent Validation of an Interview-Based Personality Assessment: A Laboratory Project , 2008 .

[66]  Dana S. Dunn,et al.  A Rubric for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing Scientific Inquiry in Psychology , 2003 .

[67]  Larry K. Michaelsen,et al.  Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education , 1992 .

[68]  Christine L. Allegretti,et al.  A Model for Thinking Critically about Ethical Issues , 1995 .

[69]  M. Leszcz,et al.  The theory and practice of group psychotherapy, 5th ed. , 2005 .

[70]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning: Training Applications , 1995 .

[71]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[72]  K. Topping.  Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[73]  Paul F. Skilton,et al.  Interdependence and Integration Learning in Student Project Teams: Do Team Project Assignments Achieve What We Want Them To? , 2008 .

[74]  A. Walker.  Group Work in Higher Education: Are Introverted Students Disadvantaged? , 2007 .

[75]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[76]  Bryan K. Saville,et al.  Interteaching versus Traditional Methods of Instruction: A Preliminary Analysis , 2005 .

[77]  Anthony Joseph,et al.  Group dynamics and collaborative group performance , 2003, SIGCSE.

[78]  S. Wheelan,et al.  Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity , 2009 .

[79]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  WRITING META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS , 1995 .

[80]  Kevin E. Simpson.  Classic and Modern Propaganda in Documentary Film: Teaching the Psychology of Persuasion , 2008 .

[81]  P. Lee,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[82]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[83]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-Based Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment , 2003 .

[84]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty , 2004 .

[85]  Robert A. Giacalone,et al.  Impression management in the organization. , 1989 .

[86]  Rob Foels,et al.  Review of ToP Teaching Strategies: Links to Students' Scientific Inquiry Skills Development , 2008 .

[87]  Maxim J. Schlossberg,et al.  Psychology Applied to Teaching (5th ed.). , 1987 .

[88]  Jeffrey D. Holmes.  Teaching Traits and Constructs through Scale Construction: A Need and a Strategy , 2008 .

[89]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[90]  M. Robin DiMatteo,et al.  Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis , 2002, Medical care.

[91]  Andrew D. Katayama,et al.  Promoting Knowledge Transfer with Electronic Note Taking , 2005 .

[92]  J. Hillman,et al.  Lessons about Gay and Lesbian Lives: A Spaceship Exercise , 2002 .

[93]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[94]  Laura A. Pawlow.  Standardized Tests and Other Criteria in Admissions Decisions: A Classroom Activity , 2010 .

[95]  Critically Evaluating Competing Theories: An Exercise Based on the Kitty Genovese Murder , 2005 .

[96]  Steven A. Meyers,et al.  Increasing Student Participation and Productivity in Small-Group Activities for Psychology Classes , 1997 .

[97]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[98]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Student Achievement , 1988 .

[99]  Scott S. Hall,et al.  Behind the Facts: Helping Students Evaluate Media Reports of Psychological Research , 2006 .

[100]  Comparing Two Collaborative Projects in a Cognitive Psychology Course , 2001 .