Evaluation of a new short generic measure of health status: howRu.

BACKGROUND Quality of life is paramount for patients and clinicians, but existing measures of health were not developed for routine use. OBJECTIVES This paper describes the development and testing of a new generic tool for measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) with direct comparison to the SF-12 Health Survey. METHODS The new tool (howRu) has four items (discomfort, distress, disability and dependence), rated using four levels (none, a little, quite a lot and extreme), providing 256 possible states (4(4)); it has an aggregate scoring scheme with a range from 0 (worst) to 12 (best). Psychometric properties were examined in a telephone survey, which also recorded SF-12. RESULTS The howRu script is shorter than SF-12 (45 words vs 294 words) and has better readability statistics. 2751 subjects, all with long-term conditions (average age 62, female 62.8%), completed the survey; 21.7% were at the ceiling (no reported problems on any dimension); 0.9% at the floor. Inter-item correlations, Cronbach's alpha and principal factor analysis suggest that a single summary score is appropriate. Correlations between the physical and mental components of both howRu and SF-12 were as expected. Across all patients the howRu score was correlated with PCS-12 (r=0.74), MCS-12 (r=0.49) and the sum of PCS-12 and MCS-12 (r=0.81). Subjects were classified by howRu score, primary condition, the number of conditions suffered, age group, duration of illness and area of residence. Across all six classifications, the correlation of the mean howRu score with the mean PCS-12 for each class was r=0.91, with MCS-12, r=0.45 and with the sum of PCS-12 and MCS-12, r=0.97. CONCLUSIONS howRu is a new short generic measure of HRQoL, with good psychometric properties. It generates similar aggregate results to SF-12. It could provide a quick and easy way for practitioners to monitor the health of patients with long-term conditions.

[1]  S. M. Huff,et al.  Research Paper: Evaluation of the Clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) Semantic Structure as a Terminology Model for Standardized Assessment Measures , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  K. Holland Proposed changes for nurse education in England (UK) as a result of the Darzi report (DoH, 2008a) Health Quality Care for All--NHS next stage review final report: some initial observations. , 2008, Nurse education in practice.

[3]  R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[4]  J E Ware,et al.  Scales for measuring general health perceptions. , 1976, Health services research.

[5]  D. Stull,et al.  Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. , 2009, Current medical research and opinion.

[6]  Pete Smith The current state of play , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  R. Hays,et al.  Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice , 2008, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[9]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[10]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes , 2007 .

[11]  J. Greenhalgh The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[13]  R. Hays,et al.  Do the pictures influence scores on the Dartmouth COOP Charts? , 1992, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  L. Morales,et al.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[15]  Rachel Rosser,et al.  New Tools for Evaluation : Their Application to Computers , 1978 .

[16]  G. Hawthorne,et al.  A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[17]  G W Torrance,et al.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. , 1972, Health services research.

[18]  J R Morris,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for the Development of a Health Status Measure , 1976, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[19]  Margaret Wood,et al.  The Apgar score has survived the test of time. , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[20]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[21]  J. W. Bush,et al.  A Health-Status Index and its Application to Health-Services Outcomes , 1970, Oper. Res..

[22]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  Comparative review and assessment of key health state measures of the general population , 2001 .

[23]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[24]  J. Chisholm,et al.  The Read clinical classification. , 1990, BMJ.

[25]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Applying quality-of-life data formally and systematically into clinical practice , 2003 .

[26]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Social indicators: health , 1971 .

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[28]  Rourke Aj Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1957, Hospital progress.

[29]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[30]  R. Rosser,et al.  The measurement of hospital output. , 1972, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  R. Beltran,et al.  Pitfalls in health communication: healthcare policy, institution, structure, and process. , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[32]  A. Pickard,et al.  Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. , 2000, Medical care.

[33]  M. Donaldson,et al.  Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice , 2008, Quality of Life Research.

[34]  Rachel Rosser,et al.  THE INDEX OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE (IHQL) - A NEW TOOL FOR AUDIT AND COST-PER-QALY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[35]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  N. Leidy,et al.  Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. , 2003, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[37]  D W Murray,et al.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[38]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[39]  Tim Benson,et al.  Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED , 2009 .

[40]  G. Hawthorne Assessing utility where short measures are required: development of the short Assessment of Quality of Life-8 (AQoL-8) instrument. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[41]  S. Messick Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[42]  Matthias Rose,et al.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[43]  S. Eisen,et al.  Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Practice , 2004, Psychiatric Quarterly.