Automation of spot counting in interphase cytogenetics using brightfield microscopy.

In situ hybridization techniques allow the enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities and form a great potential for many clinical applications. Although the use of fluorescent labels is preferable regarding sensitivity and colormultiplicity, chromogenic labels can provide an excellent alternative in relatively simple situations, e.g., where it is sufficient to use a centromere specific probe to detect abnormalities of one specific chromosome. When the frequency of chromosomal aberrations is low, several hundreds or even thousands of cells have to be evaluated to achieve sufficient statistical confidence. Since manual counting is tedious, fatiguing, and time consuming, automation can assist to process the slides more efficiently. Therefore, a system has been developed for automated spot counting using brightfield microscopy. This paper addresses both the hardware system aspects and the software image analysis algorithms for nuclei and spot detection. As a result of the automated slide analysis the system provides the frequency spot distribution of the selected cells. The automatic classification can, however, be overruled by human interaction, since each individual cell is stored in a gallery and can be relocated for visual inspection. With this system a thousand cells can be automatically analyzed in approximately 10 min, while an extra 5-10 min is necessary for visual evaluation. The performance of the system was analyzed using a model system for trisomy consisting of a mixture of male and female lymphocytes hybridized with probes for chromosomes 7 and Y. The sensitivity for trisomy detection in the seeding experiment was such that a frequency of 3% trisomic cells could be picked up automatically as being abnormal according to the multiple proportion test, while trisomy as low as 1.5% could be detected after interaction.

[1]  I T Young,et al.  A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms. , 1985, Cytometry.

[2]  H. Willard,et al.  Genomic organization of alpha satellite DNA on human chromosome 7: evidence for two distinct alphoid domains on a single chromosome , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  H. Willard,et al.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase nuclei from human primary breast tumors using chromosome-specific repetitive DNA probes. , 1988, Cancer research.

[4]  H. Tanke,et al.  Detection of chromosome aberrations in interphase tumor nuclei by nonradioactive in situ hybridization. , 1989, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[5]  F. Ramaekers,et al.  Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations in bladder cancer by in situ hybridization. , 1989, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  A. Raap,et al.  Combined GTG-banding and nonradioactive in situ hybridization improves characterization of complex karyotypes. , 1990, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[7]  D. Ward,et al.  Is non-isotopic in situ hybridization finally coming of age? , 1990, Nature.

[8]  J Anastasi,et al.  Detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic hematopoietic cells by in situ hybridization with a chromosome-specific probe. , 1990, The American journal of pathology.

[9]  J. Wiegant,et al.  Detection of the Philadelphia chromosome in interphase nuclei. , 1990, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[10]  M. Melamed,et al.  Targeted cytogenetic analysis of gastric tumors by in situhybridization with a set of chromosome‐specific dna probes , 1990, Cancer.

[11]  A. Raap,et al.  Detection of trisomy 8 in hematological disorders by in situ hybridization. , 1991, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[12]  E. Haan,et al.  Chromosomal origin of small ring marker chromosomes in man: characterization by molecular genetics. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  K Cook,et al.  Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy. , 1991, Cytometry.

[14]  F. Ramaekers,et al.  Numerical chromosome 1, 7, 9, and 11 aberrations in bladder cancer detected by in situ hybridization. , 1991, Cancer research.

[15]  J. Rowley,et al.  Detection of trisomy 12 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by fluorescence in situ hybridization to interphase cells: a simple and sensitive method. , 1992, Blood.

[16]  L. Kearney,et al.  Fluorescent in situ identification of human marker chromosomes using flow sorting and Alu element-mediated PCR. , 1992, Genomics.

[17]  K. Klinger,et al.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  K. Klinger,et al.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  A. Raap,et al.  Statistical methods in interphase cytogenetics: an experimental approach. , 1993, Cytometry.

[20]  J Vrolijk,et al.  Applicability of a noncooled video-rated CCD camera for detection of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals. , 1994, Cytometry.

[21]  Hans Vrolijk,et al.  Automation of fluorescent dot counting in cell nuclei , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[22]  A D Carothers,et al.  Counting, measuring, and mapping in FISH-labelled cells: sample size considerations and implications for automation. , 1994, Cytometry.

[23]  Sample preparation and in situ hybridization techniques for automated molecular cytogenetic analysis of white blood cells. , 1996, Cytometry.