Optogenetic versus Electrical Stimulation of Human Cardiomyocytes: Modeling Insights.

Optogenetics provides an alternative to electrical stimulation to manipulate membrane voltage, and trigger or modify action potentials (APs) in excitable cells. We compare biophysically and energetically the cellular responses to direct electrical current injection versus optical stimulation mediated by genetically expressed light-sensitive ion channels, e.g., Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). Using a computational model of ChR2(H134R mutant), we show that both stimulation modalities produce similar-in-morphology APs in human cardiomyocytes, and that electrical and optical excitability vary with cell type in a similar fashion. However, whereas the strength-duration curves for electrical excitation in ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes closely follow the theoretical exponential relationship for an equivalent RC circuit, the respective optical strength-duration curves significantly deviate, exhibiting higher nonlinearity. We trace the origin of this deviation to the waveform of the excitatory current-a nonrectangular self-terminating inward current produced in optical stimulation due to ChR2 kinetics and voltage-dependent rectification. Using a unifying charge measure to compare energy needed for electrical and optical stimulation, we reveal that direct electrical current injection (rectangular pulse) is more efficient at short pulses, whereas voltage-mediated negative feedback leads to self-termination of ChR2 current and renders optical stimulation more efficient for long low-intensity pulses. This applies to cardiomyocytes but not to neuronal cells (with much shorter APs). Furthermore, we demonstrate the cell-specific use of ChR2 current as a unique modulator of intrinsic activity, allowing for optical control of AP duration in atrial and, to a lesser degree, in ventricular myocytes. For self-oscillatory cells, such as Purkinje, constant light at extremely low irradiance can be used for fine control of oscillatory frequency, whereas constant electrical stimulation is not feasible due to electrochemical limitations. Our analysis offers insights for designing future new energy-efficient stimulation strategies in heart or brain.

[1]  Yoram Rudy,et al.  Simulation of the Undiseased Human Cardiac Ventricular Action Potential: Model Formulation and Experimental Validation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Pramod P. Khargonekar,et al.  Control of neural synchrony using channelrhodopsin-2: a computational study , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Ypey,et al.  Light-induced termination of spiral wave arrhythmias by optogenetic engineering of atrial cardiomyocytes. , 2014, Cardiovascular research.

[4]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetics in Neural Systems , 2011, Neuron.

[5]  Sarah Jarvis,et al.  Computational models of optogenetic tools for controlling neural circuits with light , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  G P Walcott,et al.  Relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation after short and long durations of ventricular fibrillation. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  E. Boyden,et al.  Multiple-Color Optical Activation, Silencing, and Desynchronization of Neural Activity, with Single-Spike Temporal Resolution , 2007, PloS one.

[8]  G. Plank,et al.  Simulating photon scattering effects in structurally detailed ventricular models using a Monte Carlo approach , 2014, Front. Physiol..

[9]  K. Deisseroth.  Optogenetics and Psychiatry: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  Edward S. Boyden,et al.  Informational Lesions: Optical Perturbation of Spike Timing and Neural Synchrony Via Microbial Opsin Gene Fusions , 2009, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[11]  Aleksandra Klimas,et al.  Cardiac applications of optogenetics. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[12]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Approaches for Diversifying and Extending Optogenetics , 2010, Cell.

[14]  J. Henley,et al.  Voltage- and temperature-dependent gating of heterologously expressed channelrhodopsin-2 , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  David Paydarfar,et al.  A simple modification of the Hodgkin and Huxley equations explains type 3 excitability in squid giant axons , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  T. Bruegmann,et al.  Optogenetic control of heart muscle in vitro and in vivo , 2010, Nature Methods.

[17]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  Modeling Study of the Light Stimulation of a Neuron Cell With Channelrhodopsin-2 Mutants , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Sahin,et al.  Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Xue Han,et al.  High-performance genetically targetable optical neural silencing by proton pumps , 2010 .

[20]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Theoretical principles underlying optical stimulation of myelinated axons expressing channelrhodopsin-2 , 2013, Neuroscience.

[21]  I. Efimov,et al.  Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[22]  Edward J. Vigmond,et al.  Fitting Membrane Resistance along with Action Potential Shape in Cardiac Myocytes Improves Convergence: Application of a Multi-Objective Parallel Genetic Algorithm , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  Kevin L. Kilgore,et al.  Energy Efficient Neural Stimulation: Coupling Circuit Design and Membrane Biophysics , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Nathan C. Klapoetke,et al.  A High-Light Sensitivity Optical Neural Silencer: Development and Application to Optogenetic Control of Non-Human Primate Cortex , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[25]  Boris Hofmann,et al.  Light induced stimulation and delay of cardiac activity. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[26]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Theoretical principles underlying optical stimulation of a channelrhodopsin-2 positive pyramidal neuron. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  E. Entcheva,et al.  Optogenetics' promise: pacing and cardioversion by light? , 2014, Future cardiology.

[28]  G. Miesenböck,et al.  The Optogenetic Catechism , 2009, Science.

[29]  Jonathan Wong,et al.  Computational Optogenetics: A Novel Continuum Framework for the Photoelectrochemistry of Living Systems. , 2012, Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids.

[30]  E. Entcheva,et al.  Channelrhodopsin2 Current During the Action Potential: “Optical AP Clamp” and Approximation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[31]  O. Z. Roy,et al.  A more efficient waveform for cardiac stimulation , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[32]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry , 2007, Nature.

[33]  Matthew G. Fishler,et al.  Theoretical predictions of the optimal monophasic and biphasic defibrillation waveshapes , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  A comprehensive multiscale framework for simulating optogenetics in the heart , 2013, Nature Communications.

[35]  Gernot Plank,et al.  The role of photon scattering in voltage-calcium fluorescent recordings of ventricular fibrillation. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[36]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  R E Jones,et al.  Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[38]  R B Stein,et al.  The threshold conditions for initiation of action potentials by excitable cells , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  M. Zaniboni,et al.  Beat-to-beat repolarization variability in ventricular myocytes and its suppression by electrical coupling. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[40]  Harold Bien,et al.  Stimulating Cardiac Muscle by Light: Cardiac Optogenetics by Cell Delivery , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[41]  L. Gepstein,et al.  Modulation of cardiac tissue electrophysiological properties with light-sensitive proteins. , 2014, Cardiovascular research.

[42]  Oscar J. Abilez,et al.  Cardiac optogenetics , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[44]  M. Courtemanche,et al.  Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[45]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Structure-Guided Transformation of Channelrhodopsin into a Light-Activated Chloride Channel , 2014, Science.

[46]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Multiscale computational models for optogenetic control of cardiac function. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[47]  D. T. Yue,et al.  Optical mapping of optogenetically shaped cardiac action potentials , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Optogenetics and thermogenetics: technologies for controlling the activity of targeted cells within intact neural circuits , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Aristides B. Arrenberg,et al.  Optogenetic Control of Cardiac Function , 2010, Science.

[50]  M. Zaniboni,et al.  Effect of input resistance voltage-dependency on DC estimate of membrane capacitance in cardiac myocytes. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[51]  H A Fozzard,et al.  Strength—duration curves in cardiac Purkinje fibres: effects of liminal length and charge distribution , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  K. Sampson,et al.  A computational model of Purkinje fibre single cell electrophysiology: implications for the long QT syndrome , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  E. Entcheva.  Cardiac optogenetics. , 2013, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[54]  Walther Akemann,et al.  A comprehensive concept of optogenetics. , 2012, Progress in Brain Research.

[55]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Ultrafast optogenetic control , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  Aleksandra Klimas,et al.  Toward microendoscopy-inspired cardiac optogenetics in vivo: technical overview and perspective , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[58]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  High-efficiency channelrhodopsins for fast neuronal stimulation at low light levels , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Edward S. Boyden,et al.  A history of optogenetics: the development of tools for controlling brain circuits with light , 2011, F1000 biology reports.

[60]  John C. Williams,et al.  Computational Optogenetics: Empirically-Derived Voltage- and Light-Sensitive Channelrhodopsin-2 Model , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..