Transformational Innovation: Reflections on How to Foster it in Engineering Education Systems*

This paper describes the educators’ disposition that we believe is required for transformational innovation. Innovating in this domain relies on interrupting existing patterns. This interruption requires the conscious recognition of patterns through an active practice of self observation. Though self observation does not necessarily need a collective process, it is served by encountering the diversity of views present in groups. Innovation in this sense consists of a fundamental identity shift in the human system and the innovators themselves. Unlike the processes of problem solving and process improvement, transformational innovation requires insight into the individual and collective attention of the designers. It also allows access to unexamined mental models and apparent cause and effect relationships. The praxis of transformational innovation within organizations looks like an active practice of reflection, experimentation and learning within the human system. We explain the theoretical perspective, suggest a protocol to begin experimenting with self observation for the purpose of pattern interruption, summarize preliminary results from a year-long process of action research involving over 25 university agents in such a change process, and comment on the limitations and risks in the protocol.

[1]  Petra Wächter Thinking in systems – a primer , 2011 .

[2]  R. Bogdan,et al.  Qualitative Research in Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Third Edition. , 1998 .

[3]  Todd C. Kelley,et al.  The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm , 2001 .

[4]  P. Freebody Qualitative Research in Education , 2003 .

[5]  W. Torbert,et al.  The Action Turn: toward a transformational social science , 2001 .

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation , 2007, CACM.

[8]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[9]  C. Argyris Actionable Knowledge: Design Causality in the Service of Consequential Theory , 1996 .

[10]  L. Atkins,et al.  Qualitative Research in Education , 2012 .

[11]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[12]  Holger Görg,et al.  What Determines Innovation Activity in Chinese State-owned Enterprises? The Role of Foreign Direct Investment , 2009 .

[13]  Dora Marcus,et al.  On Teaching and Learning in College. Reemphasizing the Roles of Learners and the Disciplines. First Edition. The Jossey-Base Series in Higher Education. , 1982 .

[14]  Dietrich Brandt Creativity at the Borders of Engineering: Three Personal Accounts , 1998 .

[15]  N. Augustine Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and students′ epistemological beliefs about learning , 1993 .

[17]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Developing Synergistic Knowledge in Student Groups , 2003 .

[18]  A. W. Court,et al.  Improving Creativity in Engineering Design Education , 1998 .

[19]  Lisa R. Lattuca Learning Interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural Perspectives on Academic Work , 2002 .

[20]  Chris Heape,et al.  The Design Space: the design process as the construction, exploration and expansion of a conceptual space , 2007 .

[21]  Diana Wright,et al.  Thinking in systems: a primer , 2012 .

[22]  Dora Marcus,et al.  On teaching and learning in college , 1982 .

[23]  W. Torbert,et al.  Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership , 2004 .

[24]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[25]  C. Argyris Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational , 1982 .

[26]  R. Bogdan Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[27]  B. Hofer,et al.  Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[28]  William R. Torbert Why educational research has been so uneducational: The case for a new model of social science based on collaborative inquiry , 1981 .