The development impact of genetic use restriction technologies: a forecast based on the hybrid crop experience

Advances in biotechnology have made available gene-manipulation tech- niques that enable the protection of genetic material from unauthorized use and the prevention of self-supply of commercial seeds by farmers—in order to allow enhanced appropriation of the values of innovation in agricultural R&D. These techniques have become known as Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs). This paper forecasts the potential impact of wide-spread adoption of GURTs by the providers of HYV seeds on the yield development in developing countries. To do so, it assesses (1) the effects of enhanced appropriation through GURTs on the technological expansion at the yield frontier and (2) the effects of technological protection of value- adding traits through GURTS on the diffusion of yield gains from the frontier to developing countries. These assessments are based on a particular hypothesis, which is that GURTs will replicate across most staple crops the experiences that were made with a previous use restriction technology (hybridization) in only a few crops. The estimation of impacts is carried out as a simulation and is based on expansion and diffusion par- ameters estimated for hybrid seeds over a 38-year period. It shows that the impact of GURTs on developing countries' yields will vary considerably. Specifically, those coun- tries that currently have the lowest yields would be most adversely affected in their future yield development by the wide-spread use of GURTs.

[1]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  Understanding the emergence of terminator technologies. , 2000 .

[2]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Science for Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective , 1993 .

[3]  Timothy Swanson,et al.  The reliance of northern economies on southern biodiversity: biodiversity as information , 1996 .

[4]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Financing Agricultural R&D in Rich Countries: What's Happening and Why , 1998 .

[5]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Agricultural Research and Development: Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions , 1996 .

[6]  V. E. Ball,et al.  Accounting for Productivity Differences in European Agriculture: Cointegration, Multilateral TFPs and R&D Spillovers , 1995 .

[7]  C. Thirtle,et al.  Technological Change and the Productivity Slowdown in Field Crops: United States, 1939-78 , 1985, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[8]  G. Maddala,et al.  A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test , 1999 .

[9]  Timothy Swanson,et al.  The economics of managing biotechnologies , 2002 .

[10]  R. A. Mueller,et al.  Private research and public benefit: The private seed industry for sorghum and pearl millet in India , 1991 .

[11]  John W. Schmidt.  Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains in Wheat , 2015 .

[12]  W. Fehr.  Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants : proceedings of a symposium sponsored by Division C-1 of the Crop Science Society of America, 2 December 1981, in Atlanta, Georgia , 1984 .

[13]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[14]  T. Swanson.  Biotechnology, Agriculture and the Developing World , 2002 .

[15]  J. Wijk,et al.  The impact of plant breeders' rights in developing countries: Debate and experience in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay , 1995 .

[16]  R. Perrin,et al.  SOME EFFECTS OF THE U.S. PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION ACT OF 1970 , 1983 .

[17]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Research and Productivity in Wheat and Maize , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  R. Evenson,et al.  Ecological diversity and rice varietal improvement in West Africa. , 2003 .

[19]  Greg Traxler,et al.  Production Risk and the Evolution of Varietal Technology , 1995 .

[20]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  North-South R & D Spillovers , 1997 .

[21]  J. Antle,et al.  Incorporating Social Costs in the Returns to Agricultural Research , 1989 .

[22]  T. Swanson,et al.  Genetic use restriction technologies and the diffusion of yield gains to developing countries , 2000 .

[23]  R. Evenson.  Spillover Benefits of Agricultural Research: Evidence from U.S. Experience , 1989 .