The Effects of Increased Processing Demands on the Sentence Comprehension of Korean-speaking Adults with Aphasia

The purpose of this study is to present evidence for a particular processing approach based on the language-specific characteristics of Korean. To compare individuals` sentence-comprehension abilities, this study measured the accuracy and reaction times (RT) of 12 aphasic patients (AP) and 12 normal controls (NC) during a sentence-picture matching task. Four versions of a sentence were constructed with the two types of voice (active/passive) and two types of word order (agent-first/patient-first). To examine the effects of increased processing demand, picture stimuli were manipulated in such a way that they appeared immediately after the sentence was presented. As expected, the AP group showed higher error rates and longer RT for all conditions than the NC group. Furthermore, Korean speakers with aphasia performed above a chance level in sentence comprehension, even with passive sentences. Aphasics understood sentences more quickly and accurately when they were given in the active voice and with agent-first order. The patterns of the NC group were similar. These results confirm that Korean adults with aphasia do not completely lose their knowledge of sentence comprehension. When the processing demand was increased by delaying the picture stimulus onset, the effect of increased processing demands on RT was more pronounced in the AP than in the NC group. These findings fit well with the idea that the computational system for interpreting sentences is intact in aphasics, but its ability is compromised when processing demands increase.

[1]  W. O'grady,et al.  A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits , 2005, Brain and Language.

[2]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[3]  C. Thompson,et al.  Pronominal Resolution and Gap Filling in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  G. Mauner Examining the Empirical and Linguistic Bases of Current Theories of Agrammatism , 1995, Brain and Language.

[6]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  No evidence for traces in sentence comprehension , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of German agrammatic aphasic patients , 2011 .

[8]  D. Swinney,et al.  An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[9]  Henk J. Haarmann,et al.  Syntactic priming in broca's aphasics: Evidence for slow activation , 1991 .

[10]  Christos Salis,et al.  Comprehension of wh-questions and declarative sentences in agrammatic aphasia: The set partition hypothesis , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[11]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Understanding Disorders in Agrammatic Patients: Capacity or Structural Deficits? , 1998, Brain and Language.

[12]  F. Dick,et al.  Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  Kerry Kilborn,et al.  Selective impairment of grammatical morphology due to induced stress in normal listeners: Implications for aphasia , 1991, Brain and Language.

[14]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[15]  David Caplan,et al.  Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic role order , 1990, Brain and Language.

[16]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[17]  G. Waters,et al.  On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving window presentation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[18]  David Caplan,et al.  Aphasic Deficits in Syntactic Processing , 2006, Cortex.

[19]  Sam-Po Law,et al.  Sentence Processing Deficits in Two Cantonese Aphasic Patients , 2000, Brain and Language.

[20]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence–picture matching electrified , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[22]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[23]  Y. Grodzinsky A Restrictive Theory of Agrammatic Comprehension , 1995, Brain and Language.

[24]  M. Just,et al.  A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients , 1994 .

[25]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.